Home Articles & Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME Collections ABOG MOC II Podcasts Videos Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2003 - Volume 101 - Issue 4 > Elective Cesarean Delivery for Term Breech
Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Original Research

Elective Cesarean Delivery for Term Breech

Krebs, Lone MD; Langhoff-Roos, Jens MD, PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Address reprint requests to: Lone Krebs, MD, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark; E-mail: lone.krebs@dadlnet.dk.

The study was funded by the Health Insurance Foundation (No. 2000B542).

The authors thank Steen Rasmussen, The National Board of Health, for his help in generating data from the registers.

Received June 24, 2002. Received in revised form October 23, 2002. Accepted November 7, 2002.

Collapse Box

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal complications of elective cesarean delivery for breech at term with those after vaginal or emergency cesarean delivery.

METHODS: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of 15,441 primiparas who delivered singleton breech at term. Information was obtained from the Danish Medical Birth Register, the Register of Death Causes, and the Denmark Patient Register.

RESULTS: Elective cesarean delivery was associated with lower rates of puerperal fever and pelvic infection (relative risk [RR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70, 0.92), hemorrhage and anemia (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84, 0.97), and operations for wound infection (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57, 0.83) than emergency cesarean delivery. There was a higher rate of puerperal fever and pelvic infection (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.11, 1.25) than for vaginal delivery. Thromboembolic disease occurred in 0.1% of women with cesarean delivery, and anal sphincter rupture occurred in 1.7% of women with vaginal delivery. Elective cesarean delivery was not associated with subsequent ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, placental complications, uterine rupture, or adverse neonatal outcome. Women with elective cesarean delivery were more often delivered by elective cesarean in their second pregnancy, compared with women delivered vaginally (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.21, 1.29). Elective cesarean delivery was associated with a lower rate of a subsequent delivery during the study period and a longer mean delivery interval than for vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION: Elective cesarean delivery for term breech carries a low risk of severe maternal complications.

Planned cesarean delivery in breech presentation at term is associated with a reduction in infant mortality and morbidity. 1,2 However, the rates of perinatal mortality and long-term complications for the infant are low, 1,3 and the benefit for the fetus should be balanced by the risk of maternal complications associated with elective cesarean delivery. Also, women and obstetricians choose an intended and not actual mode of delivery. That is important, as nearly one third of planned vaginal deliveries result in an emergency cesarean delivery, and some women who intend to have an elective cesarean delivery have vaginal or emergency cesarean deliveries before the scheduled operation. 1,4 Furthermore, there is evidence that maternal complications are more common with emergency than with elective cesarean deliveries. 5

Previous studies on maternal morbidity and mortality after cesarean delivery are inconclusive or hampered by the fact that the women having cesarean delivery have conditions, pregnancy complications, and/or delivery complications that are themselves associated with increased maternal morbidity/mortality. Also, most studies combine elective and emergency cesarean delivery, which have different complication rates. Thus, it has not been possible to conclude whether the cesarean delivery as such or the intended mode of delivery was associated with increased risk.

The objective of the present study was to examine the implications of mode of delivery in breech presentation at term, in terms of maternal mortality, puerperal morbidity, subsequent hospitalizations, or surgery for gynecologic problems, including urinary and anal incontinence, fecundity, fetal outcome, and obstetric complications in subsequent pregnancies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Denmark, the Medical Birth Register contains information on all births until 1995, based on notifications completed by midwives.

Information on all hospitalizations in Denmark is electronically stored in the National Patient Register with codes for operations, interventions, and diagnoses at discharge. Diagnoses are coded according to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (8th revision applied 1982–1993 and 10th revision applied 1994–2000). Operations and interventions are coded by Classification of Surgical Procedures and Treatments (version 3, 1982–1995), and the Nordic Classification of Surgical Procedures (version 1, 1996–2000).

The Register of Death Causes contains dates and causes of deaths, based on diagnoses on the death certificate.

A cohort of all primiparas who delivered a singleton infant in breech presentation at term in Denmark during 1982–1995 was identified in the Medical Birth Register, and information on mode of delivery (elective cesarean, vaginal, emergency cesarean) and other relevant obstetric variables (birth weight, intrapartum or early neonatal death, “smoker at first consultation” (midwife), gestational age, Apgar score, episiotomy, forceps delivery) were retrieved from the register.

The cohort was described by information from the Register of Death Causes on date and cause of death through 1998.

Specific diagnoses from actual delivery (rupture of anal sphincter, bladder lesion, diabetes in pregnancy, hypertensive disorder), all complications until 6 weeks postpartum (pelvic infection, puerperal fever, operation for wound infection, hysterectomy), and subsequent and future diagnoses and operations from hospitalizations until year 2001 for gynecologic and obstetric conditions and complications (vesicovaginal fistula, vaginal descensus, uterine rupture, urinary or anal incontinence) were retrieved from the National Patient Register.

Also, the cohort was merged with the Birth Register to obtain information on later pregnancies, including perinatal death, time of death in relation to birth, Apgar score, elective cesarean delivery, emergency cesarean delivery, intervention during labor, placental complications, gestational age, birth weight, and presentation at birth.

Data were received in anonymous, case-based form from the National Board of Health and analyzed by the SPSS 11.0 for Windows statistical program (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The differences between the groups were examined by t test, χ2, and Fisher exact test.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 732,559 infants were born. A cohort of 15,441 (2.1%) primiparas with a singleton infant in breech presentation at term was identified and classified by the actual mode of delivery. A total of 7503 (48.6%) women were delivered by elective cesarean (cesarean delivery before labor), 2363 (15.3%) vaginally, and 5575 (36.1%) by emergency cesarean delivery (cesarean delivery after onset of labor) (Table 1). Mode of delivery did not change during the study period (Figure 1).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

Epidemiologic and obstetric characteristics of the cohort according to mode of delivery are described in Table 1. The rates of intrapartum or early neonatal death and low 5-minute Apgar score were lower in infants delivered by elective cesarean, compared with infants delivered vaginally or by emergency cesarean. In women with elective cesarean delivery, more women were less than 20 years or 35 or more years old at delivery. Women with elective cesarean delivery more often had hypertensive disorders or diabetes in pregnancy, compared with women who delivered vaginally. In women who delivered vaginally, 5.1% were delivered by forceps, and 47.6% had episiotomy.

From 1982 to 1998, a total of 83 women (0.5%) from the cohort died. Three women, all with emergency cesarean at first delivery, died in relation to pregnancy and childbirth. Two primiparous women died 40 and 55 days after emergency cesarean delivery. Both had a diagnosis of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and puerperium. One woman died from a pulmonary embolism 39 days after her second delivery. Her first delivery was by emergency cesarean, but the second was an uncomplicated vaginal delivery.

The rate of deaths in the cohort was higher subsequent to a first emergency cesarean delivery than a first vaginal delivery. When comparing the group of women with vaginal delivery or emergency cesarean delivery with women with elective cesarean delivery, there was no difference.

The majority of the 83 deaths were related to cancer (45.8%). Medical disease (including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cerebral hemorrhage and infarction, pulmonary embolism not related to pregnancy, infections, and heart diseases) was the cause of death in 15.7% of the cases. Suicide and death related to the abuse of alcohol or narcotics were responsible for 12.0% and 7.2% of the deaths, respectively, and 7.2% died as a result of an accident (Table 2).

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

Elective cesarean delivery was associated with lower risk of puerperal fever and pelvic infection (relative risk [RR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70, 0.92), hemorrhage and anemia (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84, 0.97), and operation for wound infection (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57, 0.83) compared with emergency cesarean delivery, but with a higher risk of puerperal fever and pelvic infection (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.11, 1.25) compared with vaginal delivery. The frequency of bladder injuries sutured during elective and emergency cesarean deliveries were 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools

There were 13 cases of thromboembolism in women with cesarean delivery (0.1%) and none in those delivered vaginally (not significant). The rate of thromboembolism was not correlated with type of cesarean delivery (Table 3). No women underwent hysterectomy in the puerperium.

Among the vaginal deliveries, 1.7% of the women had a rupture of the anal sphincter.

Hospitalization with vaginal descensus or urine incontinence was not significantly related to mode of delivery and was reported in 13 (0.6%) women who delivered vaginally, 42 (0.6%) delivered by elective cesarean, and 80 (0.5%) delivered by emergency cesarean in the follow-up period (5–18 years after the first delivery). The mean age at first delivery in women with urinary incontinence or vaginal descensus did not differ between the three groups. There were no cases hospitalized with a diagnosis of fistula or anal incontinence.

The number of admissions to hospital with a diagnosis of infertility was 79 (1.1%) after elective cesarean delivery, 23 (1.0%) after vaginal delivery, and 61 (1.1%) after emergency cesarean delivery. Ectopic pregnancies were recorded in 184 (2.5%) women with elective cesarean delivery, 66 (2.8%) with vaginal delivery, and 144 (2.6%) with emergency cesarean delivery. Hospitalization with miscarriage was recorded in 508 (6.8%) women with elective cesarean delivery, 167 (7.1%) with vaginal delivery, and 409 (7.3%) with emergency cesarean delivery.

A significantly lower proportion of women delivered by elective cesarean (55%) had a subsequent child, compared with 61% of those delivered vaginally (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92, 0.96) and with 59% of those delivered by emergency cesarean (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.88, 0.95). Adjusting for age and medical condition at first delivery (ie, including only women younger than 30 without diabetes, hypertensive disorders, or perinatal death during the first pregnancy), the rates of women with a second child were 61% in the group with a first elective cesarean delivery, 64% in the group with a first vaginal delivery, and 64% in those with a first emergency cesarean delivery (Table 4).

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools

Women delivered by elective cesarean in their first pregnancy more often had repeated breech presentation in their second pregnancy (16%) than those with a first vaginal delivery (12%) (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02, 1.09). Women with elective cesarean delivery in their first pregnancy were also more often delivered by elective cesarean in their second pregnancy (16%), compared with those with a first vaginal delivery (5%) (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.21, 1.29) (Table 5).

Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools

Mode of delivery in first pregnancy did not influence the perinatal outcome of the second or third pregnancy in terms of Apgar score and perinatal death.

The incidences of placental abruption and placenta previa in the second or third pregnancy of women with an elective cesarean delivery in first pregnancy did not differ significantly from those delivered vaginally.

Uterine rupture in second or third pregnancy occurred in five women (0.1%) with a first elective cesarean delivery, in two (0.05%) with a first emergency cesarean delivery, and in none of those delivered vaginally. This difference is not statistically significant (Table 6).

Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

We studied pregnant women with breech presentation at term. The main reason for choosing a cesarean mode of delivery in these women is the increased risk for the infant or a maternal desire for planned operative delivery. Otherwise, they do not differ significantly from the background population regarding maternal risk at delivery. Thus, the outcomes of the present study are also relevant for pregnant women considering elective cesarean delivery without other obstetric indications.

Previous studies on maternal risk include a randomized, controlled trial and a meta-analysis of controlled studies. In the randomized, controlled trial of 2083 term breech pregnancies, intended cesarean delivery was not associated with a higher risk of maternal mortality or morbidity in the first 3 months postpartum. 1,6 However, the size of the study was inadequate to detect significant differences in rare but serious complications. Moreover, because of the prospective design of the study, it will take many years before results on long-term morbidity and complications in future pregnancies are available.

A meta-analysis of studies published between 1966 and 1992 of planned cesarean delivery compared with planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term showed that planned vaginal delivery was associated with a lower short-term maternal morbidity and mortality (odds ratio 0.61; 95% CI 0.47, 0.80) than planned cesarean delivery. 7

In the present study, the rate of direct obstetric deaths in relation to a first delivery of breech was 130 per million (2 per 15,441), and the two deaths occurred in women delivered by emergency cesarean (359 per million). According to confidential inquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom from 1994 to 1996 (2,197,567 deliveries), the rates of death per million were 20.6 after vaginal delivery, 58.5 after elective cesarean delivery, and 182.0 after emergency cesarean delivery (Hall M, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery [letter]. Lancet 1999;354:776). 8

The incidence of hemorrhage and anemia after elective cesarean delivery (5.7%) did not differ from that after vaginal delivery and was lower than after emergency cesarean delivery (7.0%). This is in accordance with a study from the Netherlands, in which a blood loss of more than 1000 mL occurred in 4.7% of elective cesarean deliveries. 5 Also, surgical interventions for wound infection and pelvic infection or puerperal fever was more frequent in women delivered by emergency cesarean. However, recommendations on routine use of prophylactic antibiotics introduced in recent years might have reduced the current rates of infections.

Thromboembolism is the major cause (36%) of maternal death in the United Kingdom. 8 Even when thromboembolism is not fatal, it is a serious complication often associated with postthrombotic sequelae and a need for prolonged medical treatment. In the present study, there were no cases of thromboembolism in the group delivered vaginally, and the rates were 0.1% in both cesarean delivery groups.

Anal sphincter rupture at vaginal delivery is associated with a subsequent risk of anal incontinence. 9 The fear of anal sphincter rupture is one of the main reasons for elective cesarean delivery on maternal request. The rate of sphincter rupture in the present study was 1.7%, which suggests a risk of subsequent flatus incontinence of 0.7% to 0.9% subsequent to a vaginal delivery.

Surgical trauma to the bladder is usually repaired during the cesarean delivery. Subsequently, the woman carries a urine catheter for about 1 week, usually without other complications or sequelae. 10 In the present material it was less frequent during elective (0.1%) than during emergency cesarean delivery (0.2%).

In follow-up studies, vaginal delivery has been found to increase the risk of urinary incontinence 3–6 times. 11,12 In this study, the total incidences of diagnosis of or operation for vaginal descensus or incontinence were approximately 0.5%, regardless of mode of delivery. The low rate and the lack of difference by mode of delivery may reflect the short follow-up period of less than 18 years and the fact that only serious complications leading to hospitalization are included.

Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage subsequent to the first delivery were not correlated with mode of delivery. In a Finnish register–based study, primiparas with cesarean delivery had a significantly increased risk of subsequent miscarriage (RR 1.22). 13

Recurrence of breech presentation in second pregnancy was high (15%). This is consistent with data reported from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. 14 Interestingly, breech presentation was more often repeated in women who had elective cesarean delivery in their first pregnancy than in those delivered vaginally. A tentative explanation for this association may be that in cases in which the presentation is caused by maternal factors, such as uterus malformation or pelvis abnormalities, women are more often offered repeated elective cesarean delivery. However, the influence of fetal causes, such as recurrent growth restriction, cannot be excluded. Even with a 15% risk of breech at term in the second pregnancy, the rate of vaginal delivery after cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy was as high as 72%.

The relationship between cesarean delivery and placenta previa (RR 3.78–5.34) has been documented in previous studies, with a rate of 0.27% in pregnancies after a first cesarean delivery. 13 The rate was nonsignificantly lower in our study and did not differ by mode of delivery, possibly because of size of the population.

The rates of placental abruption after cesarean delivery were similar in our study (0.3%) and in the population of Finland (0.4%). In the Finnish study 13 there was a significant increase of placental abruption after cesarean delivery.

Uterine rupture occurred in 1 per 1000 women with elective cesarean delivery. Previous studies have reported a rate of uterine rupture during intended vaginal delivery after cesarean delivery of 0.8% 15 and up to 2.5% after induction of labor with prostaglandin. 16 One explanation of the lower rate of uterine rupture in our study could be that the risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery might be lower in women delivered by cesarean indicated by breech than in women with cesarean delivery indicated by fetal–pelvic disproportion.

The 20–50% lower risk of preterm or low birth weight infants in pregnancies subsequent to elective cesarean delivery might be due to selection bias, because elective cesarean delivery of term breech is preferred when birth weight is high, which implies a low risk of preterm or low birth weight infants in subsequent pregnancies.

In conclusion, elective cesarean delivery for breech at term implies a low risk of severe medical complications for the mother. It seems that a recommendation of elective cesarean delivery is associated with a similar or even lower risk of maternal complications than a recommendation of vaginal delivery, which includes a risk of emergency cesarean delivery.

In a clinical context, the results of the present study support a recommendation of elective cesarean delivery for breech at term to women who consider medical consequences more important than the rewarding experience of a natural birth.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnet ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, et al. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83.

2. Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J. Breech delivery in Denmark, 1982–92: A population-based case-control study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999;13:431–41.

3. Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J, Thorngren-Jerneck K. Long-term outcome in term breech infants with low Apgar score. A population based follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;100:5–8.

4. Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J. Breech presentation at term: Indications for secondary caesarean section. In: Künzel W, ed. European practice in gynaecology and obstetrics. Breech delivery. Paris: Elsevier, 2002; 127–37.

5. van Ham MAPC, van Dongen PWJ, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;74:1–6.

6. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, Chalmers B, Kung R, Willan A, et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech at term. The International Randomized Breech Trial. JAMA 2002;287:1822–31.

7. Chengh M, Hannah M. Breech delivery at term: A critical review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:605–18.

8. Department of Health. Why mothers die. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: The Department of Health, 1998.

9. Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:225–30.

10. David JD. Management of injuries to the urinary and gastrointestinal tract during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999;26:469–80.

11. Højbjerg KE, Salvig JD, Winsloew NA, Lose G, Secher NJ. Urinary incontinence: Prevalence and risk factors at 16 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:842–50.

12. Persson J, Wølner-Hanssen P, Rydstroem H. Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: A population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:440–5.

13. Hemminki E, Meriläinen J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1569–74.

14. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM. Reproductive career after breech presentation: Subsequent pregnancy rates, interpregnancy interval and recurrence. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:345–50.

15. Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Ezra Y, Rojansky N. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Current opinion. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996;53:1–10.

16. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3–8.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 23 time(s).

Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004
Denk, CE; Kruse, LK; Jain, NJ
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care, 33(3): 203-209.

Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction
Influence of mode of delivery in term breech presentation on the Apgar score and transfert in neonatal care unit Results of the management of 568 singleton pregnancies in a level III French maternity
Delotte, J; Trastour, C; Bafghi, A; Boucoiran, I; D'Angelo, L; Bongain, A
Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction, 37(2): 149-153.
10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.09.004
CrossRef
Laeknabladid
Complications of cesarean deliveries
Valgeirsdottir, H; Haroardottir, H; Bjarnadottir, RI
Laeknabladid, 96(1): 37-42.

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Assisted vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in breech presentation
Krupitz, H; Arzt, W; Ebner, T; Sommergruber, M; Steininger, E; Tews, G
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(6): 588-592.

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Will there ever be an end to the Caesarean section rate debate?
Dietz, HP; Peek, MJ
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 44(2): 103-106.

Seminars in Perinatology
Urinary incontinence: Is cesarean delivery protective?
Nygaard, I
Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5): 267-271.
10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.007
CrossRef
Seminars in Perinatology
Cesarean delivery on maternal request versus planned vaginal delivery: Impact on development of pelvic organ prolapse
Richter, HE
Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5): 272-275.
10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.008
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Labor induces a maternal inflammatory response syndrome
Molloy, EJ; O'Neill, AJ; Grantham, JJ; Sheridan-Pereira, M; Fitzpatrick, JM; Webb, DW; Watson, RW
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190(2): 448-455.
10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.027
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The international randomized Term Breech Trial
Hannah, ME; Whyte, H; Hannah, WJ; Hewson, S; Amankwah, K; Cheng, M; Gafni, A; Guselle, P; Helewa, M; Hodnett, ED; Hutton, E; Kung, R; McKay, D; Ross, S; Saigal, S; Willan, A
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 191(3): 917-927.
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004
CrossRef
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
What's new and novel in obstetric anesthesia? Contributions from the 2003 scientific literature
Tsen, LC
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 14(2): 126-146.
10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.007
CrossRef
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Evidence-based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden
Alexandersson, O; Bixo, M; Hogberg, U
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(6): 584-587.

Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
The end of vaginal breech delivery
Burke, G
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113(8): 969-972.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00997.x
CrossRef
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Recurrence of breech presentation in consecutive pregnancies
Ford, JB; Roberts, CL; Nassar, N; Giles, W; Morris, JM
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117(7): 830-836.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02576.x
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Cesarean section and risk of pelvic organ prolapse: a nested case-control study
Larsson, C; Kallen, K; Andolf, E
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200(3): -.
ARTN 243.e1
CrossRef
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands
Schutte, JM; Steegers, EAP; Santema, JG; Schuitemaker, NWE; Van Roosmalen, J
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86(2): 240-243.
10.1080/00016340601104054
CrossRef
Danish Medical Bulletin
Breech at term - Early and late consequences of delivery
Krebs, L
Danish Medical Bulletin, 52(4): 234-252.

Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Public health implications of cesarean on demand
Plante, LA
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 61(): 807-815.

Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
Emergency delivery and perimortem C-section
Stallard, TC; Burns, B
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 21(3): 679-+.
10.1016/S0733-8627(03)00042-7
CrossRef
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
Visco, AG; Viswanathan, M; Lohr, KN; Wechter, ME; Gartlehner, G; Wu, JM; Palmieri, R; Funk, MJ; Lux, L; Swinson, T; Hartmann, K
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108(6): 1517-1529.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000241092.79282.87
PDF (378) | CrossRef
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Elective Cesarean Delivery: The Pelvic Perspective
WEBER, AM
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50(2): 510-517.
10.1097/GRF.0b013e31804c9cae
PDF (94) | CrossRef
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Breech Delivery Before and After the Term Breech Trial
Vidaeff, AC
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 49(1): 198-210.

PDF (127)
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
The Downside of Cesarean Delivery: Short- and Long-Term Complications
ZELOP, C; HEFFNER, LJ
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47(2): 386-393.

PDF (69)
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Natural History of Fetal Position During Pregnancy and Risk of Nonvertex Delivery
Witkop, CT; Zhang, J; Sun, W; Troendle, J
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 111(4): 875-880.
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318168576d
PDF (612) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2003 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share