Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Relationship of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐I and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins in Umbilical Cord Plasma to Preeclampsia and Infant Birth Weight
Vatten, Lars J. MD, PhD; Ødegård, Rønnaug A. MD; Nilsen, Stein Tore MD, PhD; Salvesen, Kjell Å. MD, PhD; Austgulen, Rigmor MD, PhD
Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rogaland Central Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Address reprint requests to: Lars J. Vatten, MD, PhD, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Medical Centre, N‐7489 Trondheim, Norway; E‐mail: email@example.com.
This study was financially supported by the Norwegian Medical Research Council and the Norwegian Cancer Society.
The authors thank the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry for assistance.
Received June 21, 2001. Received in revised form September 17, 2001. Accepted September 24, 2001.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preeclampsia influences insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I), insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 (IGFBP‐1), and insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐3 (IGFBP‐3), independent of its effect on birth weight.
METHODS: Cord blood was collected in 12,804 consecutive deliveries. We identified 258 preeclamptic pregnancies that were subclassified as mild or severe and early or late. For comparison, 609 control pregnancies were selected. Fetal growth was expressed as the ratio between observed and expected birth weight, with adjustment for gestational age at birth. IGF‐I, IGFBP‐1, and IGFBP‐3 were measured in umbilical plasma. The contribution of preeclampsia and birth weight to each measured factor was assessed by multiple linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Between mild preeclampsia and controls, there were no differences in IGF‐I, IGFBP‐1, and IGFBP‐3. In severe and early onset preeclampsia, umbilical cord plasma IGF‐I was approximately 50% lower, and IGFBP‐1 was more than twice as high as in controls (both P < .01). At each birth weight level, IGF‐I was lower and IGFBP‐1 was higher in severe or early preeclampsia than among controls of similar weight. Birth weight and preeclampsia were, independent of each other, associated with IGF‐I, whereas birth weight, but not preeclampsia, was associated with IGFBP‐1, after adjustment for gestational age.
CONCLUSION: Fetal growth restriction caused by severe or early preeclampsia is associated with lower umbilical levels of IGF‐I than low birth weight caused by other conditions. Preeclampsia may contribute to the observed IGF‐I reduction, either as part of the underlying causes of preeclampsia, or as a consequence of the disease.
Insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) is a mitogenic polypeptide that stimulates cellular proliferation and differentiation.1 The strong positive correlation between umbilical cord IGF‐I and birth weight indicates its importance for fetal growth.1–4 Thus, IGF‐I is expressed by fetal organs,5 membranes,6 and by the placenta.6–9 The function of IGF‐I is modulated by six binding proteins with high affinity (IGFBPs). The smaller, such as IG‐FBP‐1, may be responsible for the transfer of IGF‐I from the circulation to the extracellular space, whereas the larger IGFBP‐3 binds 95% of IGF‐I and provides a reservoir for IGF‐I in the circulation.1,9 IGFBP‐1 usually inhibits the effects of IGF‐I at the cellular level,9 but is also related to cell growth independent of IGF‐I.9 In pregnancy, the production of IGFBP‐1 is strongly increased,9 and abnormally high levels of IGFBP‐1 have been found in umbilical10–16 blood in conjunction with fetal growth restriction, whereas umbilical IGFBP‐3 may be lower in infants born small for their gestational age.17 It has been hypothesized that inadequate nutrition of the fetus will stimulate production of IGFBP‐1 and inhibit the effect of IGF‐I.18 A combination of high umbilical levels of IGFBP‐1 and low IGF‐I could, therefore, reflect an adaptive response to an intrauterine environment that cannot offer the fetus optimal conditions for growth.18
Preeclampsia is a heterogeneous syndrome, with varying effects on fetal growth. In mild cases, fetal growth is usually appropriate,7 whereas fetal growth restriction is commonly observed in severe preeclampsia or in preeclampsia with early onset.7 These subtypes of preeclampsia are characterized by abnormally shallow decidual trophoblast invasion, hypoxia, and reduced uteroplacental blood flow.7,8,19 A few studies have reported lower IGF‐I and IGFBP‐3 and higher IGFBP‐1 in umbilical cord blood levels from preeclamptic pregnancies complicated by low birth weight.15,20 One study found that alterations in IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1 were more pronounced in preeclampsia than could be expected from the smaller size of the offspring,20 suggesting that preeclampsia may contribute with an effect independent of the relation to birth weight. In this large case‐control study, we wanted to find out whether preeclampsia is associated with alterations in IGF‐I and its binding proteins IGFBP‐1 and IGFBP‐3, independent from changes attributed to reduced birth weight.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Umbilical cord blood samples were collected in a prospective study of pregnancy outcome that took place from January 1993 to December 1995 at Rogaland Central Hospital in Stavanger, Norway. The maternity clinic at this hospital serves exclusively a region of approximately 239,000 inhabitants, and in all, 12,804 deliveries took place during the study period. The Norwegian Medical Birth Registry records information on all deliveries that take place in the country,21 and we used this information to identify potential cases of preeclampsia and to select population controls, as previously described.22 The study was approved by the regional committee for ethics in medical research and by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate.
From the Medical Birth Registry, we initially identified approximately 1300 cases with clinical information that might indicate preeclampsia. After verifying and supplementing this information with details from the hospital records, we identified 307 singleton pregnant women with certain preeclampsia, and umbilical cord blood was available from 258 of these women. We used a previously described definition of preeclampsia in this study.23 Briefly, for preeclampsia to be diagnosed, persistent diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mm Hg had to develop after 20 weeks of gestation, and diastolic blood pressure had to increase by at least 25 mm Hg. In addition, proteinuria had to be present, and cut‐off was defined as 0.3 mg/L (semiquantitative dipstick 1+) in at least one urine sample after 20 weeks of gestation without simultaneous urinary infection.
Preeclampsia was classified as severe (n = 67) if diastolic blood pressure increased to at least 110 mm Hg, along with proteinuria 3+ on dipstick, or at least 500 mg per 24 hours. Cases with eclampsia and suspected hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome were also regarded as severe preeclampsia, whereas all other cases of preeclampsia were classified as mild (n = 191).
For comparison, two women without preeclampsia were selected per case of preeclampsia from the cohort of birthing women at the Rogaland Central Hospital, as previously described.22 Among 619 women without preeclampsia initially selected, cord blood was available from 609. For the whole study population, information on baseline data were obtained at around 12 weeks of pregnancy, at the first maternal visit. All infant data were collected from hospital records. In Table 1, we have described some characteristics of the groups.
Blood samples were collected in syringes from the placental side of the umbilical cord after delivery. The centrifugation syringes contained heparin, and all blood samples were chilled to 4C up to 60 hours before centrifugation at 3000 revolutions per minute for 15 minutes. Plasma was stored at −80C until analyzed.
Birth weight was standardized as the ratio between the observed and expected birth weight, where the expected birth weight was adjusted for offspring gender and gestational age at birth. We used standards of expected birth weights derived from the results of weight curves based on ultrasonographic measurements in a large Scandinavian population.24 Gestational age at birth was calculated from routine ultrasonographic measurements at 18 weeks' gestation. In tables and text, standardized weight is expressed as the mean value with 95% confidence intervals. Small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) was defined as an observed birth weight two standard deviations or more below the expected, which corresponds to a ratio lower than 0.76, or to a birth weight reduction of approximately 840 g for a term infant.
Cord plasma IGF‐I and IGFBP‐3 were assayed by commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (Mediagnost, Tuebingen, Germany). All samples were run in duplicates, and all procedures were run as suggested by the producer, except that we used half volumes. IGF‐I and IGFBP‐3 were detected in all plasma samples, and detection limits were 4.8 ng/mL and 370 ng/mL, respectively. Cord plasma IGFBP‐1 was assayed by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay (Mediagnost, Tuebingen, Germany), and single samples were analyzed. The detection limit of the assay was 4.6 ng/mL, and IGFBP‐1 was detected in all but one sample. The three assays were run in 11 sequences, and for all three, the intra‐assay variation was on average less than 4%. The intra‐assay coefficients of variation for IGF‐I, IGFBP‐3, and IGFBP‐1 were 12%, 10%, and 16%, respectively.
For the IGF‐I analyses, plasma samples were available from 609 controls and 191 cases of mild and 67 cases of severe preeclampsia. For the IGFBP‐1 analyses, plasma samples were available from 604 controls and 190 cases of mild and 66 cases of severe preeclampsia. For the IGFBP‐3 analyses, plasma samples were available from 601 controls and 190 cases of mild and 65 cases of severe preeclampsia.
IGFBP‐1 had a skewed distribution and was, therefore, expressed as the median value (ng/mL, interquartile range). Student t test and Mann‐Whitney U test were used to compare continuous variables between groups. Differences between proportions were assessed by χ2 tests. The standardized birth weight was divided into four clinical categories: <0.76 corresponded to a strict definition of SGA, and 0.76–0.89 was a broad category of relatively small infants. The category 0.90–1.09 included infants with appropriate weight for their gestational age, and the category >1.09 included large babies. For each level of birth weight, we estimated values of IGF‐I, IGFBP‐1, and IGFBP‐3 between the preeclampsia group and controls, and tested the linear association (yielding a P value for trend) across birth weight categories for each of the three components of the IGF system in multiple regression analyses. We also assessed the independent contribution of birth weight and preeclampsia to levels of IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1, and adjusted for gestational age, using multiple regression analyses. All statistical analyses were calculated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 10.05 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
Overall (Table 2), the severe preeclampsia group had lower levels of IGF‐I (P < .01) and IGFBP‐3 (P < .05) in umbilical cord plasma than controls. For IGFBP‐1, the severe preeclampsia group had values two times higher than controls (P < .01). The measured values varied only modestly with length of gestation. It is, therefore, unlikely that the differences between the groups can be attributed to differences in gestational age at birth. For all three factors, the results for mild preeclampsia did not significantly differ from those of controls (Table 2).
Table 3 shows that the most dramatic differences between the groups can be attributed to severe preeclampsia with early onset of symptoms (34 weeks' gestation and earlier). In the “early onset” group, IG‐FBP‐1 (median 611 ng/mL) was more than six times higher than in controls (97 ng/mL). Compared with “late onset” preeclampsia, the median value in the “early onset” group was four times higher (P < .01). Nonetheless, in severe preeclampsia with late onset, IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1 were still significantly different from controls (both P < .01).
In Table 4, IGF‐I and the binding proteins IGFBP‐1 and IGFBP‐3 were related to predefined categories of standardized birth weight, and adjusted for gestational age and offspring gender. There was a consistent decrease in IGF‐I from the largest to the smallest babies (SGA), both within the severe preeclampsia group and among controls (both P for trend < .01), with more than a two‐fold difference in IGF‐I between the highest and the lowest categories of birth weight. For each level of birth weight, however, IGF‐I was significantly lower in the severe preeclampsia group than among controls, after controlling for differences in gestational age.
The results for IGFBP‐1 showed an opposite pattern: IGFBP‐1 increased strongly with decreasing birth weight, both among controls and in the severe preeclampsia group, but the increase was much stronger in the preeclampsia group. Thus, SGA (birth weight standard less than 0.76) infants in the preeclampsia group had a five‐fold higher cord plasma IGFBP‐1 (984 ng/mL) compared with babies born with appropriate weight (birth weight standard 0.90–1.09) for their gestation (181 ng/mL). Among controls, the same comparison showed a two‐fold difference in IGFBP‐1 (193 versus 97 ng/mL).
For IGFBP‐3, there was a decrease in birth weight within each study group. By comparing the groups at each level of birth weight, however, there were no significant differences in IGFBP‐3 between the severe preeclampsia group and controls.
In the multivariate analyses (Table 5), we found that severe preeclampsia and birth weight were strongly associated with IGF‐I levels, after adjustment for gestational age. Table 5 also shows that birth weight, but not severe preeclampsia, was associated with IGFBP‐1.
In this study, we found that umbilical IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1 levels in severe or early preeclampsia differed from those of control pregnancies, and these differences were particularly strong when preeclampsia was complicated by very low birth weight. In multivariate analyses, the results suggest that birth weight and preeclampsia, independent of each other, may influence IGF‐I. Umbilical IGFBP‐1 was also strongly related to birth weight, but the association with preeclampsia was not statistically significant in multivariate analyses. Previously, one study has indicated that IGF‐I and the binding proteins may be altered by preeclampsia per se,20 but compared with our investigation, that study was small. We included a large and representative sample of pregnant women that allowed us to apply a strict definition of preeclampsia.23 We also distinguished between subtypes (mild or severe; early or late) of preeclampsia with statistical power sufficient to yield precise results. Further, we adjusted for differences in gestational age between the preeclampsia groups and controls, factors that strengthen the validity of our results.22
The reason for being small may influence the relation between IGF‐I, IGFBPs, and infant birth weight. Previously, two studies have compared different groups of neonates who were small for gestation, but for different reasons.10,18 One group had suffered from intrauterine growth restriction most likely caused by placental disease, whereas the other group was born small for gestational age for a variety of reasons other than placental disease. The results were similar for maternal10 and umbilical18 measurements: fetuses with placental insufficiency had the lowest IGF‐I and the highest levels of IGFBP‐1. In our study, low birth weight in the control group may also have been caused by a variety of reasons, and some infants will simply be constitutionally small. In contrast, infants born after severe and early onset preeclampsia may be a relatively homogeneous group with placental insufficiency.19 Consequently, the lower values of IGF‐I and the very high values of IGFBP‐1 associated with the combination of severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction may reflect placental disease.
The shallow trophoblast invasion typical for severe or early preeclampsia is associated with highly elevated expression of IGFBP‐1 in the decidua,7,8 and high levels of maternal IGFBP‐1 in early pregnancy may be associated with increased risk of severe, but not mild preeclampsia.25,26 Those results may support the hypothesis that mild and severe preeclampsia may represent separate disease entities, and suggest that IGFBP‐1 is involved in initial mechanisms at the maternal‐placental interface that may culminate in severe preeclampsia.7,8 However, our results indicate that IGFBP‐1 is more closely linked to birth weight than to preeclampsia, and this could suggest that IGFBP‐1 is involved in compensatory or adaptive responses to insufficient fetal nutrition that will accompany severe preeclampsia.18 On the other hand, the close association between IGF‐I and severe preeclampsia may reflect compromised trophoblast function.27,28 Thus, low IGF‐I levels in severe preeclampsia may be the consequence of placental dysfunction rather than the underlying cause.
1. Chard T. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in normal and abnormal human fetal growth. Growth Regul 1994;4:91–100.
2. Verhaeghe J, van Bree R, van Herck E, Laureys J, Bouillon R, van Assche A. C-peptide, insulin-like growth factors I and II, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in umbilical cord serum: Correlations with birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:89–97.
3. Giudice LC, deZegner F, Gargosky SE, Dsupin BA, de las Fuentes L, Crystal RA, et al. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in the term and preterm fetus and neonate with normal and extremes of intrauterine growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:1548–55.
4. Spencer JAD, Chang TC, Jones J, Robeson SC, Preece MA. Third trimester fetal growth and umbilical venous blood concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-1, and growth hormone at term. Arch Dis Child 1995;73:F87–F90.
5. Han VKM, D'Ercole AJ, Lund PK. Central localization of somatomedin (insulin-like growth factor) messenger RNA in the human fetus. Science 1987;236:193–7.
6. Han VKM, Bassett N, Walton J, Challis JRG. The expression of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) genes in the human placenta and membranes: Evidence for IGF-IGFBP interactions at the feto-maternal interface. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:2680–93.
7. Giudice LC, Martina NA, Crystal RA, Tazuke S, Druzin M. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 at the maternal-fetal interface and insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-II, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the circulation of women with severe preeclampsia. Am J Gynecol 1997;176:751–8.
8. Irwin JC, Suen LF, Martina NA, Mark SP, Giudice LC. Role of the IGF system in trophoblast invasion and preeclampsia. Hum Reprod 1999;14(suppl 2):90–6.
9. Jones JI, Clemmons DR. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: Biological actions. Endocrinol Rev 1995;16:3–34.
10. Holmes R, Montemagno R, Jones J, Preece M, Rodeck C, Soothill P. Fetal and maternal plasma insulin-like growth factors and binding proteins in pregnancies with appropriate or retarded fetal growth. Early Hum Dev 1997;49:7–17.
11. Tazuke SI, Mazure NM, Sugawara J, Carland G, Faessen GH, Suen LF, et al. Hypoxia stimulates insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) gene expression in HepG2 cells: A possible model for IGFBP-1 expression in fetal hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998;95:10188–93.
12. Osorio M, Torres J, Moya F, Pezzulo J, Salafia C, Baxter R, et al. Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF binding proteins-1, -2, and -3 in newborn serum: Relationships to fetoplacental growth at term. Early Hum Dev 1996;46:15–26.
13. Leger J, Oury JF, Noel M, Baron S, Benali K, Blot P, et al. Growth factors and intrauterine growth retardation. I. Serum growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, and IGF binding protein-3 levels in normally grown and growth-retarded human fetuses during the second half of gestation. Ped Res 1996;40:94–100.
14. Klauwer D, Blum WF, Hanitsch S, Rascher W, Lee PDK, Kiess W. IGF-I, IGF-II, free IGF-I and IGFBP-1, -2 and -3 levels in venous cord blood: Relationship to birthweight, length and gestational age in healthy newborns. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:826–33.
15. Baldwin S, Chung T, Rogers M, Chard T, Wang HS. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1, glucose tolerance and fetal growth in human pregnancy. J Endocrinol 1993;136:319–25.
16. Fant M, Salafia C, Baxter RC, Schwander J, Vogel C, Pezzulo J, et al. Circulating levels of IGFs and IGF binding proteins in human cord serum: Relationships to intrauterine growth. Reg Pept 1993;48:29–39.
17. Wang HS, Lee JD, Cheng BJ, Soong YK. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 in preeclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:654–9.
18. Langford K, Blum W, Mikolaides K, Jones J, McGregor A, Miell J. The pathophysiology of the insulin-like growth factor axis in fetal growth failure: A basis for programming by undernutrition? Eur J Clin Invest 1994;24:851–6.
19. Ness RB, Roberts JM. Heterogenous causes constituting the single syndrome of preeclampsia: A hypothesis and its implications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1365–70.
20. Halhali A, Tovar AR, Torres N, Bourges H, Garabedian M, Larrea F. Preeclampsia is associated with low circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor I and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in maternal and umbilical cord compartments. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1828–33.
21. Lie RT, Rasmussen S, Brunborg H, Gjessing HK, Lie NE, Irgens LM. Foetal and maternal contributions to risk of preeclampsia: Population-based study. BMJ 1998;316:1343–7.
22. Ødegård R, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KÅ, Austgulen R. Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:950–5.
23. CLASP. A randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of preeclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. Collaborative Low-Dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy Group. Lancet 1994;343:619–29.
24. Marsal K, Persson PH, Larsen T, Lilja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr 1996;85:843–8.
25. de Groot CJM, O'Brien TH, Taylor RN. Biochemical evidence of impaired trophoblast invasion of decidual stroma in women destined to have preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:24–9.
26. Grobman WA, Kazer RR. Serum insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in women who develop preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:521–6.
27. Ødegård RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KÅ, Vefring H, Austgulen R. Umbilical cord plasma interleukin-6 and fetal growth restriction in preeclampsia: A prospective study in Norway. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:289–94.
28. Hill DJ, Clemmons DR, Riley SC, Bassett N, Challis JRG. Immunohistochemical localization of insulin-like growth factors (IGF) and IGF binding proteins, -1, -2, and -3 in human placenta and fetal membranes. Placenta 1993;14:1–12.
This article has been cited 1 time(s).
Growth FactorsAssociations between insulin-like growth factor I, vascular endothelial growth factor and its soluble receptor 1 in umbilical serum and endothelial cells obtained from normotensive and preeclamptic pregnanciesGrowth Factors
© 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Looking for ABOG articles? Visit our ABOG MOC II collection. The selected Green Journal articles are free through the end of the calendar year.
ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS
If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.