Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 1999 - Volume 93 - Issue 4 > Associated Factors in 1611 Cases of Brachial Plexus Injury
Obstetrics & Gynecology:
Original Research

Associated Factors in 1611 Cases of Brachial Plexus Injury

GILBERT, WILLIAM M. MD; NESBITT, THOMAS S. MD, MPH; DANIELSEN, BEATE PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, University of California, Davis, Davis; and Health Information Solutions, Redwood City, California.

Address reprint requests to: William M. Gilbert, MD, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA 95817; E-mail: wmgilbert@ucdavis.edu

Received June 30, 1998. Received in revised form September 22, 1998. Accepted October 8, 1998.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To identify risk factors associated with brachial plexus injury in a large population.

Methods: A computerized data set containing records from hospital discharge summaries of mothers and infants and birth certificates was examined. The deliveries took place in more than 300 civilian acute care hospitals in California between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1995. Cases of brachial plexus injury were evaluated for additional diagnoses and procedures of pregnancy, such as mode of delivery, gestational diabetes, and shoulder dystocia. Those complications were stratified by birth weight and analyzed, using bivariate and multivariate techniques to identify specific risk factors.

Results: Among 1,094,298 women who delivered during the 2 years, 1611 (0.15%) had diagnoses of brachial plexus injury. The frequency of diagnosis increased with the addition of gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7, 2.1), forceps delivery (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.7, 4.3), vacuum extraction (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.4, 3.1), and shoulder dystocia (OR 76.1, 95% CI 69, 84). In cases of brachial plexus injury, the frequency of shoulder dystocia increased from 22%, when birth weight ranged between 2.5 and 3.5 kg, to 74%, when birth weight exceeded 4.5 kg. The frequency of diagnosis of other malpresentation (non-breech) (OR 73.6, 95% CI 66, 83) was increased for all birth weight categories. Severe (OR 13.6, 95% CI 8.3, 22.5) and mild (OR 6.3, 95% CI 3.9, 10.1) birth asphyxia were increased. Prematurity (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.67, 0.98) and fetal growth restriction (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.03, 0.40) were protective against brachial plexus injury.

Conclusion: In macrosomic newborns, shoulder dystocia was associated with brachial plexus injury, but in low- and normal-weight infants, “other malpresentation” was diagnosed more frequently than shoulder dystocia. Our study findings suggest that brachial plexus injury has causes in addition to shoulder dystocia and might result from an abnormality during the antepartum or intrapartum period.

Birth trauma is a major source of pregnancy-related medical litigation, especially when permanent injury results.1 Permanent brachial plexus injury is a leading cause of litigation related to birth trauma. Permanent injury to the newborn's brachial plexus is rare and not always associated with a difficult delivery.2,3 The etiology of brachial plexus injury is believed to be excessive downward traction on the fetal head during the attempt to deliver the anterior shoulder in a vaginal delivery.4,5 This downward traction strains the brachial plexus in the neck, resulting in transient or permanent injury, and is believed to be caused by shoulder dystocia.4,5 Most studies partially support this belief. In their retrospective review, Jennett et al2 found that more than half of the cases (22 of 39) of brachial plexus injury were not associated with shoulder dystocia. They concluded that brachial plexus injury might be the result of intrauterine maladaption and should not be taken as prima facie evidence of a birth-process injury. The current literature on brachial plexus injury is a collection of case reports or series, that cover multiyear periods.2,3,6–9 Management and diagnostic modalities change with time, and those studies do not reflect those changes.

Brachial plexus injury has a reported occurrence rate of 0.05–0.26% of all deliveries.9–14 Most injuries are transient, with full return of function occurring in 70–95% of cases.9–14 In this study, we examined brachial plexus injury, associated risk factors such as shoulder dystocia, and maternal-fetal complications in all births at civilian hospitals in California during a 2-year period.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

A database that linked maternal and neonatal hospital discharge records to birth certificate vital statistics records was used. The linkage of vital statistics was established for all civilian hospitals that reported to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1995. That database did not include births at military facilities, home deliveries, out-of-state deliveries, or births at birthing centers not reporting to the California office. The method was able to link 98.9% of maternal and 98.6% of neonatal hospital discharge records with the birth record vital statistics, an overall linkage of 97.9%. This generated a database of 1,094,298 deliveries. With the use of statistical software, the database was searched using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision15 (ICD-9), codes, which resulted in specific data for statistical analysis.

The database was sampled for the diagnosis of brachial plexus injury and those records were examined for ICD-9 codes relating to pregnancy outcomes and maternal complications. The linked database was searched for demographic, antepartum, intrapartum, and post-partum diagnoses, including diabetes and operative vaginal delivery. Modes of delivery and stratified birth weights were compared with the frequency of brachial plexus injury. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated comparing for presence of brachial plexus injury. The frequency of the following birth outcomes were determined: birth trauma (ICD-9 767), birth asphyxia (ICD-9 768), fetal growth restriction (FGR, ICD-9 764), intraventricular hemorrhage (ICD-9 772.1), sub-arachnoid hemorrhage (ICD-9 772.2), and infant length of stay. Incidences of the following complications were determined from the maternal records: other malpresentation (ICD-9 763.1), shoulder dystocia (ICD-9 660.4), gestational diabetes (ICD-9 648.8), and prematurity. The terms were from ICD-915 and were not defined further.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Among 1,094,298 women who delivered during the 2 years, 1611 (0.15%) had diagnoses of brachial plexus injury recorded. The individual percentage risks of brachial plexus injury and associated ORs, separated by mode of delivery, are shown in Table 1. The risk of brachial plexus injury is greater in deliveries assisted by forceps or vacuum extractor. There were 60 cases (0.03%) of brachial plexus injury among women who delivered by cesarean; the frequency of brachial plexus injury among women who delivered vaginally was greater (Table 1). The risk of brachial plexus injury increased with increasing birth weight and particular modes of delivery (Figure 1). Forceps, vacuum extractor, and cesarean deliveries were associated with similar increases in brachial plexus injury with increasing birth weight.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

The effect of gestational diabetes (OR 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7, 2.1) on brachial plexus injury is shown in Figure 2. Assisted vaginal deliveries (forceps and vacuum extractor) in nondiabetic women was equivalent to spontaneous vaginal deliveries in diabetic women in terms of frequency of brachial plexus injury (Figure 2). The macrosomic (> 4500 g) newborns of diabetic women who had assisted vaginal deliveries had the highest brachial plexus injury rate (7.8%). The frequency of shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury increased with increasing birth weight, with 22% of newborns weighing 2.5–3.5 kg with brachial plexus injury also having shoulder dystocia. This increased to 74% in newborns weighing more than 4.5 kg (Figure 3). Overall, 53% of brachial plexus injury cases involved diagnoses of shoulder dystocia. However, the frequency of diagnosis of other malpresentation (ICD-9 763.1) was increased in all birth weight categories (Figure 3), exceeding shoulder dystocia in the low birth weight category. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes are displayed in Table 2. All types of birth asphyxia were increased with brachial plexus injury. Prematurity and FGR appeared to be protective against brachial plexus injury.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Figure 3
Figure 3
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

We found individual and collective risk factors associated with diagnoses of brachial plexus injury in our population of more than 1 million deliveries. This large population allowed for a detailed analysis and reflects a true population frequency (0.15%) for the state of California.9–14 Brachial plexus injury increased with increasing birth weight, shoulder dystocia, assisted vaginal deliveries, and gestational diabetes. The highest risk group for having newborns with brachial plexus injury (7.8%) was diabetic women who underwent forceps or vacuum-assisted deliveries and whose infants weighed more than 4.5 kg at birth (Figure 2). The frequency of diagnosis of other malpresentation was increased (OR 73.6, 95% CI 66, 83) in our population, suggesting non-shoulder dystocia causes of brachial plexus injury. Vacuum extractor and forceps deliveries increased the risk of brachial plexus injury. Cesarean delivery decreased the risk of but did not prevent brachial plexus injury (Figure 1). Neonatal morbidity was increased in newborns in our population (Table 2). The majority of newborns were discharged home, a small percentage were transferred to other institutions or referred for home health services.

One finding in our study was that more than half (53%) of all cases of brachial plexus injury were associated with diagnoses of shoulder dystocia. Among macrosomic infants, shoulder dystocia was absent in 26% of cases of brachial plexus injury. Graham et al3 found that 53% of cases of brachial plexus injury also involved diagnoses of shoulder dystocia, whereas Jennett et al2 found even fewer (43%) cases of brachial plexus injury to be associated with shoulder dystocia. Not all cases of brachial plexus injury are the result of difficult deliveries or traction on the anterior shoulder.4,16,17 Ouzounian et al4 reported on eight infants without shoulder dystocia, four of whom had a brachial plexus injury in the posterior arm that did not undergo downward traction during delivery. Shoulder dystocia might be important in brachial plexus injury, especially in macrosomic infants, but it cannot explain completely brachial plexus injury in low- and normal-weight infants.

We were surprised to find an increase in the frequency of diagnosis of other malpresentation (ICD-9, 763.1), associated (OR 73.6, CI 66, 83) with brachial plexus injury less frequently only than shoulder dystocia (Table 2). The increase in frequency of diagnosis of other malpresentation was equivalent across birth weight categories, compared with shoulder dystocia, whose frequency of diagnosis increased with increasing birth weight (Figure 3). The other malpresentation diagnosis was coded when a fetus presented abnormally (other than breech) in labor or delivery, and this diagnosis was coded in 0.5% of the entire population. Exact fetal presentations cannot be determined from our data set because the ICD-9 coding for other malpresentation is recorded in the discharge summaries. Whether the increase in that diagnosis was due to a reporting or coding error cannot be determined from our data set. If the increase in frequency of other malpresentation is accurate, it might show a cause of brachial plexus injury. Our findings suggest two possibilities: 1) shoulder dystocia, resulting in excessive traction on the brachial plexus, is the cause of a certain percentage of cases of brachial plexus injury; and, 2) fetal malpresentation, before or during labor and delivery, results in brachial plexus injury. A small percentage (15%, Figure 3) of macrosomic infants with brachial plexus injury were not associated with shoulder dystocia or other malpresentation, suggesting other possible causes of brachial plexus injury.

A difficult problem when one is confronted with a newborn with brachial plexus injury, is whether the injury was preventable. If identifiable risk factors can be found, an elective cesarean delivery might prevent brachial plexus injury. The majority (92%) of patients in the highest risk group (diabetic women who underwent assisted vaginal delivery and whose infants weighed more than 4.5 kg at birth) did not have brachial plexus injury and cesarean delivery would have been unnecessary. If inaccuracy in estimating fetal weight is added to this equation, our success rate for identifying the high-risk group would be worse. Many associations were found between obstetric conditions (macrosomia, diabetes, forceps and vacuum extractor deliveries, obesity, prolonged labor) and brachial plexus injury, but predicting which newborns will have brachial plexus injuries is unreliable.6,7 Infants who are delivered by cesarean have decreased risks of brachial plexus injury.10,18 However, routine use of cesarean delivery in certain patients at increased risk was not warranted. Macrosomia is commonly associated with brachial plexus injury; however, Ecker et al6 could not recommend routine use of cesarean delivery in the case of macrosomia. Rouse et al19 found no benefit to elective cesarean delivery in women with estimated fetal weights of more than 4.5 kg, unless the patients also had diabetes in which case the policy (of elective cesarean) became tenable. Perlow et al20 used multiple logistic regression to determine whether brachial plexus injury could be predicted. Only 19% of cases of brachial plexus injury were able to be identified before delivery and thus possibly were prevented.20

The majority of cases of brachial plexus injury diagnosed at birth resolve shortly thereafter. Nocon et al7 found that 96% of 28 cases of brachial plexus injury diagnosed at birth resolved within 6 months after delivery. Morrison et al,8 in a 10-year review, reported that 91% of 82 cases of brachial plexus injury resolved with no sequelae. Others13,14,21 report similar resolution rates. The best correlation with permanent brachial plexus injury is transient brachial plexus injury, which, as we discussed earlier, cannot be identified reliably. Permanent brachial plexus injury itself cannot be identified reliably before birth. An important question about patient management involves women who present with histories of brachial plexus injury in previous pregnancies. Literature reporting on recurrent brachial plexus injury is limited. al-Qattan and al-Kharfy22 hand surgeons who treat patients with permanent brachial plexus injury, reported a high recurrence of brachial plexus injury in their patients. Of eight women whose children had prior permanent brachial plexus injury, who delivered a total of 16 more offspring, two-thirds had infants with permanent brachial plexus injury, and the injury was worse in newborns who were also macrosomic. al-Qattan and al-Kharfy22 concluded that elective cesarean delivery might be indicated in cases of macrosomia and a history of brachial plexus injury. Their population included a large percentage of patients with permanent brachial plexus injury, and whether the conclusion applies to patients with resolved brachial plexus injury (the majority of patients) is unclear. Gordon et al13 found that 14% of their 59 subjects with brachial plexus injury had histories of brachial plexus injury in previous pregnancies. That information, if acted on through performance of elective cesarean delivery could have prevented brachial plexus injury in those newborns. Offering elective cesarean delivery to women with children with permanent brachial plexus injury is indicated. In cases in which prior brachial plexus injury resolved after birth, cesarean delivery should be discussed and considered as an option. We were unable to determine whether the brachial plexus injuries reported were permanent or temporary. Only information on discharges from the hospital was available, not information on follow-up visits.

Neonatal morbidities were increased in the brachial plexus injury population, with an increase in mild and severe birth asphyxia and subarachnoid hemorrhage (Table 2), confirming previous publications.10,13,23 Evidence of increased morbidity was demonstrated indirectly by a three-fold increase in newborn lengths of stay, compared with newborns without brachial plexus injury (Table 2). Additional evidence of increased morbidity was shown by the increase in referrals to other hospitals and referrals for home health services. There were no reported neonatal deaths in the 1583 infants who were discharged from delivering hospitals. The outcomes of the 28 neonates who were referred to other hospitals are unknown. Prematurity and FGR were protective against brachial plexus injury, probably relating to lower birth weight in those infants. The data presented here show that there are potentially multiple causes of brachial plexus injury, including shoulder dystocia, malpresentation, diabetes, and operative vaginal delivery.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Jakobovits A. Medico-legal aspects of brachial plexus injury: The obstetrician's point of view. Med Law 1996;15:175–82.

2. Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ, Kreinick CJ. Brachial plexus palsy: An old problem revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1673–6.

3. Graham EM, Forouzan I, Morgan MA. A retrospective analysis of Erb's palsy cases and their relation to birth weight and trauma at delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:1–5.

4. Ouzounian JG, Korst LM, Phelan JP. Permanent Erb palsy: A traction-related injury? Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:139–41.

5. Iffy L, Varadi V, Jakobovits A. Common intrapartum denominators of shoulder dystocia related birth injuries. Zentralbl Gynakol 1994;116:33–7.

6. Ecker JL, Greenberg JA, Norwitz ER, Nadel AS, Repke JT. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:643–7.

7. Nocon JJ, McKenzie DK, Thomas LJ, Hansell RS. Shoulder dystocia: An analysis of risks and obstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1732–7.

8. Morrison JC, Sanders JR, Magann EF, Wiser WL. The diagnosis and management of dystocia of the shoulder. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:515–22.

9. Walle T, Hartikainen-Sorri AL. Obstetric shoulder injury. Associated risk factors, prediction and prognosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:450–4.

10. McFarland LV, Raskin M, Daling JR, Benedetti TJ. Erb/Duchenne's palsy: A consequence of fetal macrosomia and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:784–8.

11. Hardy AE. Birth injuries of the brachial plexus. Incidence and prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981;63:98–101.

12. Levine MG, Holroyde J, Woods JR, Siddiqi TA, Scott M, Miodovnik M. Birth trauma: Incidence and predisposing factors. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:792–5.

13. Gordon M, Rich H, Deutschberger J, Green M. The immediate and long-term outcome of obstetric birth trauma. I. Brachial plexus paralysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;117:51–6.

14. Adler JB, Patterson RL Jr. Erb's Palsy. Long term results of treatment in eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:1052–64.

15. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases. 9th rev. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.

16. Hankins GD, Clark SL. Brachial plexus palsy involving the posterior shoulder at spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am J Perinatol 1995;12:44–5.

17. Dunn DW, Engle WA. Brachial plexus palsy: Intrauterine onset. Pediatr Neurol 1985;1:367–9.

18. Scheller JM, Nelson KB. Does cesarean delivery prevent cerebral palsy or other neurologic problems of childhood? Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:624–30.

19. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276:1480–6.

20. Perlow JH, Wigton T, Hart J, Strassner HT, Nageotte MP, Wolk BM. Birth trauma. A five-year review of incidence and associated perinatal factors. J Reprod Med 1996;41:754–60.

21. Specht EE. Brachial plexus palsy in the newborn. Incidence and prognosis. Clin Orthop 1975;110:32–4.

22. al-Qattan MM, al-Kharfy TM. Obstetric brachial plexus injury in subsequent deliveries. Ann Plas Surg 1996;37:545–8.

23. Ubachs JMH, Slooff ACJ, Peeters LLH. Obstetric antecedents of surgically treated obstetric brachial plexus injuries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:813–7.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 77 time(s).

American Journal of Perinatology
Brachial Plexus Palsy and Shoulder Dystocia: Obstetric Risk Factors Remain Elusive
Ouzounian, JG; Korst, LM; Miller, DA; Lee, RH
American Journal of Perinatology, 30(4): 303-307.
10.1055/s-0032-1324698
CrossRef
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Prospective validation of fetal weight estimation using fractional limb volume
Lee, W; Deter, R; Sangi-Haghpeykar, H; Yeo, L; Romero, R
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 41(2): 198-203.
10.1002/uog.11185
CrossRef
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
Precipitous and Difficult Deliveries
Silver, DW; Sabatino, F
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 30(4): 961-+.
10.1016/j.emc.2012.08.004
CrossRef
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Shoulder dystocia without versus with brachial plexus injury: A case-control study
Chauhan, SP; Christian, B; Gherman, RB; Magann, EF; Kaluser, CK; Morrison, JC
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 20(4): 313-317.
10.1080/14767050601165805
CrossRef
Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume
Clinical-electromyography correlation in infants with obstetric brachial plexopathy
Heise, CO; Siqueira, MG; Martins, RS; Gherpelli, JLD
Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume, 32A(7): 999-1004.
10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.002
CrossRef
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
The influence of macrosomia on the duration of labor, the mode of delivery and intrapartum complications
Siggelkow, W; Boehm, D; Skala, C; Grosslercher, M; Schmidt, M; Koelbl, H
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 278(6): 547-553.
10.1007/s00404-008-0630-7
CrossRef
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
ACOG practice bulletin - Shoulder dystocia
[Anon]
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 80(1): 87-92.

Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Labour characteristics and neonatal Erb's palsy
Weizsaecker, K; Deaver, JE; Cohen, WR
Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114(8): 1003-1009.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01392.x
CrossRef
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Newborn brachial plexus injuries: The twisting and extension of the fetal head as contributing causes
Sandmire, H; Morrison, J; Racinet, C; Hankins, G; Pecorari, D; Gherman, R
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28(2): 170-172.
10.1080/01443610801913053
CrossRef
American Journal of Perinatology
Shoulder Dystocia: Comparison of the ACOG Practice Bulletin with Another National Guideline
Chauhan, SP; Gherman, R; Hendrix, NW; Bingham, JM; Hayes, E
American Journal of Perinatology, 27(2): 129-136.
10.1055/s-0029-1224864
CrossRef
Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health
Shoulder dystocia: Etiology, common risk factors, and management
Jevitt, CM
Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 50(6): 485-497.
10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.07.005
CrossRef
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Temporary Erb-Duchenne palsy without shoulder dystocia or traction to the fetal head
Allen, RH; Gurewitsch, ED
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105(5): 1210-1212.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000141635.94905.21
CrossRef
Gynakologe
Shoulder dystocia and plexus paresis
Schwenzer, T
Gynakologe, 34(8): 752-755.

Proceedings of the Xix European Congress of Perinatal Medicine
Congenital brachial palsy - Risk factors and outcome
Luis, C; Barroso, R; Cadete, A; Carreiro, H; Beckert, P; Machado, MC
Proceedings of the Xix European Congress of Perinatal Medicine, (): 289-292.

Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Erb's palsy causation - Iatrogenic or resulting from labor forces?
Sandmire, HF; DeMott, RK
Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 50(8): 563-566.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ultrasound biometry evolves in the management of diabetes in pregnancy
Langer, O
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 26(6): 585-595.
10.1002/uog.2615
CrossRef
Saudi Medical Journal
Birth associated trauma
Awari, BH; Al-Habdan, I; Sadat-Ali, M; Al-Mulhim, A
Saudi Medical Journal, 24(6): 672-674.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: A population-based study
Gilbert, WM; Hicks, SM; Boe, NM; Danielsen, B
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(5): 911-917.
10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00809-3
CrossRef
Arquivos De Neuro-Psiquiatria
Prognostic relevance of risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexopathy
Heise, CO; Gherpelli, JLD
Arquivos De Neuro-Psiquiatria, 64(1): 30-34.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation
Hart, NC; Hilbert, A; Meurer, B; Schrauder, M; Schmid, M; Siemer, J; Voigt, M; Schild, RL
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 35(1): 42-47.
10.1002/uog.7493
CrossRef
Muscle & Nerve
Obstetric lesions of the brachial plexus
van Dijk, JG; Pondaag, W; Malessy, MJA
Muscle & Nerve, 24(): 1451-1461.

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies
Wong, SF; Chan, FY; Cincotta, RB; Oats, JJ; McIntyre, HD
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 41(4): 429-432.

Pediatrics
Patient safety events during pediatric hospitalizations
Miller, MR; Elixhauser, A; Zhan, CL
Pediatrics, 111(6): 1358-1366.

Revue Neurologique
Obstetric paralysis of the newborn: management strategy and outcomes
Gilbert, A; Pivato, G
Revue Neurologique, 160(): 1230-1233.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
Management of infant brachial plexus injuries
Shenaq, SM; Bullocks, JM; Dhillon, G; Lee, RT; Laurent, JP
Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 32(1): 79-+.
10.1016/j.cps.2004.09.001
CrossRef
Pediatric Radiology
MRI of rotator cuff muscle atrophy in relation to glenohumeral joint incongruence in brachial plexus birth injury
Poyhia, TH; Nietosvaara, YA; Remes, VM; Kirjavainen, MO; Peltonen, JI; Lamminen, AE
Pediatric Radiology, 35(4): 402-409.
10.1007/s00247-004-1377-3
CrossRef
Southern Medical Journal
Chart documentation of informed consent for operative vaginal delivery: Is it adequate?
Nichols, CM; Pendlebury, LC; Jennell, J
Southern Medical Journal, 99(): 1337-1339.

Pediatric Neurology
Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy
Zafeiriou, DI; Psychogiou, K
Pediatric Neurology, 38(4): 235-242.
10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.09.013
CrossRef
Clinics in Perinatology
Birth injuries of the brachial plexus
Piatt, JH
Clinics in Perinatology, 32(1): 39-+.
10.1016/j.clp.2004.11.006
CrossRef
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: A birth injury not explained by the known risk factors
Backe, B; Magnussen, EB; Johansen, OJ; Sellaeg, G; Russwurm, H
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87(): 1027-1032.
10.1080/00016340802415648
CrossRef
Journal of Hand Surgery-European Volume
Elbow Flexion After Primary Reconstruction in Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy
Terzis, JK; Kokkalis, ZT
Journal of Hand Surgery-European Volume, 34E(4): 449-458.
10.1177/1753193409105188
CrossRef
Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedure for Obstetric Plexus Brachialis Palsy: Review and Recommendations of an Interdisciplinary Study Group
Hasenlechner, I; Jager, H; Paternostro-Sluga, T; Frey, M; Schuhfried, O; Hormann, M; Alacamlioglu, Y; Aszmann, O; Herceg, M; Meixner, A; Kern, H
Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin, 20(1): 9-19.
10.1055/s-0029-1225633
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: A systematic review
Lieberman, E; O'Donoghue, C
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(5): S31-S68.
10.1067/mob.2002.122522
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Risk factors for brachial plexus injury with and without shoulder dystocia
Gurewitsch, ED; Johnson, E; Hamzehzadeh, S; Allen, RH
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(2): 486-492.
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.071
CrossRef
Archives De Pediatrie
Repair of the brachial plexus in the obstetrical lesions of the newborn
Gilbert, A
Archives De Pediatrie, 15(3): 330-333.
10.1016/j.arcped.2007.12.008
CrossRef
Revista De Neurologia
Congenital brachial palsy: its epidemiology and sequelae. a retrospective study of our case mix
Labrandero-de Lera, C; Pascual-Pascual, SI; Perez-Rodriguez, J; Roche-Herrero, MC
Revista De Neurologia, 46(): 719-723.

Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi
Perinatal Brachial Plexus Palsy: Review
Karadavut, KI; Basaran, A
Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(5): 697-703.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Neonatal brachial plexus palsy: An unpredictable injury
Donnelly, V; Foran, A; Murphy, J; McParland, P; Keane, D; O'Herlihy, C
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(5): 1209-1212.
10.1067/mob.2002.127723
CrossRef
Pediatric Neurosurgery
A systematic review of brachial plexus surgery for birth-related brachial plexus injury
McNeely, PD; Drake, JM
Pediatric Neurosurgery, 38(2): 57-62.
10.1159/000068045
CrossRef
Pediatric Clinics of North America
Birth injuries of the brachial plexus
Piatt, JH
Pediatric Clinics of North America, 51(2): 421-+.
10.1016/S0031-3955(03)00212-8
CrossRef
Muscle & Nerve
Motor conduction studies for prognostic assessment of obstetrical plexopathy
Heise, CO; Lorenzetti, L; Marchese, AJT; Gherpelli, JLD
Muscle & Nerve, 30(4): 451-455.
10.1002/mus.20121
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: A review
Chauhan, SP; Grobman, WA; Gherman, RA; Chauhan, VB; Chang, G; Magann, EF; Hendrix, NW
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(2): 332-346.
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.020
CrossRef
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Maternal and anthropomorphic risk factors for shoulder dystocia
Mazouni, C; Porcu, G; Cohen-Solal, E; Heckenroth, H; Guidicelli, B; Bonnier, P; Gamerre, M
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85(5): 567-570.
10.1080/00016340600605044
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Brachial plexus injury: A 23-year experience from a tertiary center
Chauhan, SP; Rose, CH; Gherman, RB; Magann, EF; Holland, MW; Morrison, JC
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192(6): 1795-1800.
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.060
CrossRef
Folia Neuropathologica
The analysis of the intrasurgical view of the obstetric brachial plexus palsy
Gosk, J; Rutowski, R; Rabczynski, J
Folia Neuropathologica, 43(3): 143-147.

Journal of Reproductive Medicine
What is shoulder dystocia?
Collins, JH; Collins, CL
Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 46(2): 148-150.

Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Effect of operative vaginal delivery on the outcome of permanent brachial plexus injury
Poggi, SH; Ghidini, A; Allen, RH; Pezzullo, JC; Rosenbaum, TC; Spong, CY
Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 48(9): 692-696.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prediction of brachial plexus stretching during shoulder dystocia using a computer simulation model
Gonik, B; Zhang, N; Grimm, MJ
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 189(4): 1168-1172.
10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00578-7
CrossRef
International Urogynecology Journal
Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia - a decision analysis
Culligan, PJ; Myers, JA; Goldberg, RP; Blackwell, L; Gohmann, SF; Abell, TD
International Urogynecology Journal, 16(1): 19-28.
10.1007/s00192-004-1203-3
CrossRef
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
High birthweight and shoulder dystocia: the strongest risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy in a Swedish population-based study
Mollberg, M; Hagberg, H; Bager, B; Lilja, H; Ladfors, L
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(7): 654-659.

Clinics in Perinatology
Long-term neurologic outcome of infants born by cesarean section
Adams-Chapman, I
Clinics in Perinatology, 35(2): 437-+.
10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.001
CrossRef
Neurosurgery Clinics of North America
Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injuries
Malessy, MJA; Pondaag, W
Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 20(1): 1-+.
10.1016/j.nec.2008.07.024
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Defining forces that are associated with shoulder dystocia: The use of a mathematic dynamic computer model
Gonik, B; Zhang, N; Grimm, MJ
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188(4): 1068-1072.
10.1067/mob.2003.250
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Permanent brachial plexus injury following vaginal delivery without physician traction or shoulder dystocia
Lerner, HM; Salamon, E
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(3): E7-E8.
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.018
CrossRef
Neurochirurgie
Management and results of treating obstetrical palsy in the new-born
Gilbert, A
Neurochirurgie, 55(): 427-431.
10.1016/j.neuchi.2009.09.002
CrossRef
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases
Raio, L; Ghezzi, F; Di Naro, E; Buttarelli, M; Franchi, M; Durig, P; Bruhwiler, H
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 109(2): 160-165.
10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00045-9
CrossRef
American Journal of Perinatology
Brachial plexus paresis associated with fetal neck compression from forceps
Gei, AF; Smith, RA; Hankins, GDV
American Journal of Perinatology, 20(6): 289-291.

Pediatric Clinics of North America
Management of birth injuries
Uhing, MR
Pediatric Clinics of North America, 51(4): 1169-+.
10.1016/j.pcl.2004.03.007
CrossRef
Clinics in Perinatology
Management of birth injuries
Uhing, MR
Clinics in Perinatology, 32(1): 19-+.
10.1016/j.clp.2004.11.007
CrossRef
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy among neonates delivered by vacuum extraction
Mollberg, M; Hagberg, H; Bager, B; Lilja, H; Ladfors, L
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106(5): 913-918.

Journal of Perinatal Medicine
An approach to the prediction of neonatal Erb palsy
Deaver, JE; Cohen, WR
Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 37(2): 150-155.
10.1515/JPM.2009.021
CrossRef
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Motor Nerve-Conduction Studies in Obstetric Brachial Plexopathy for a Selection of Patients with a Poor Outcome
Heise, CO; Siqueira, MG; Martins, RS; Gherpelli, JLD
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 91A(7): 1729-1737.
10.2106/JBJS.H.00542
CrossRef
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury: A population-based study
Christoffersson, M; Rydhstroem, H
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 53(1): 42-47.

Gynakologe
Screening, diagnostics and therapy of gestational diabetes
Schaefer-Graf, UM; Vetter, K
Gynakologe, 35(7): 652-660.
10.1007/s00129-002-1207-3
CrossRef
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus
Weiner, Z; Ben-Shlomo, Z; Beck-Fruchter, R; Goldberg, Y; Shalev, E
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 105(1): 20-24.
PII S0301-2115(02)00140-9
CrossRef
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review
Pondaag, W; Malessy, MJA; van Dijk, JG; Thomeer, RTWM
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46(2): 138-144.

European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Maternal morbidity associated with obstetrical maneuvers in shoulder dystocia
Mazouni, C; Menard, JP; Porcu, G; Cohen-Solal, E; Heckenroth, H; Gamerre, M; Bretelle, F
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 129(1): 15-18.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.006
CrossRef
Clinics in Perinatology
Shoulder dystocia
Gurewitsch, ED; Allen, RH
Clinics in Perinatology, 34(3): 365-+.
10.1016/j.clp.2007.04.001
CrossRef
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
Shoulder dystocia: An update
Gottlieb, AG; Galan, HL
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 34(3): 501-+.
10.1016/j.ogc.2007.07.002
CrossRef
Muscle & Nerve
Newborn brachial plexus palsy: Evaluation of severity using quantitative ultrasound of muscle
Zaidman, CM; Holland, MR; Noetzel, MJ; Park, TS; Pestronk, A
Muscle & Nerve, 47(2): 246-254.
10.1002/mus.23518
CrossRef
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Obstetrical Brachial Palsy: Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, and Prevention
POLLACK, RN; BUCHMAN, AS; YAFFE, H; DIVON, MY
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 43(2): 236-246.

Obstetrics & Gynecology
A Comparison of Shoulder Dystocia‐Associated Transient and Permanent Brachial Plexus Palsies
Gherman, RB; Ouzounian, JG; Satin, AJ; Goodwin, TM; Phelan, JP
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 102(3): 544-548.

PDF (96)
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Management of Shoulder Dystocia: Trends in Incidence and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity
MacKenzie, IZ; Shah, M; Lean, K; Dutton, S; Newdick, H; Tucker, DE
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110(5): 1059-1068.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000287615.35425.5c
PDF (979) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Management of One Hundred Seventy‐One Operative and Nonoperative Obstetrical Birth Palsies At the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
Badr, Y; O'Leary, S; Kline, DG
Neurosurgery, 65(4): A67-A73.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000345942.14391.1C
PDF (474) | CrossRef
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
A Guest Editorial: New Insights to Shoulder Dystocia and Brachial Plexus Palsy
Gherman, RB
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 58(1): 1-2.

PDF (92)
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Are All Brachial Plexus Injuries Caused by Shoulder Dystocia?
Doumouchtsis, SK; Arulkumaran, S
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 64(9): 615-623.
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181b27a3a
PDF (546) | CrossRef
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Entrapment Neuropathy Contributing to Dysfunction After Birth Brachial Plexus Injuries
Adelson, PD; Nystrom, NA; Sclabassi, R
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 25(5): 592-597.
10.1097/01.bpo.0000161092.23468.1c
PDF (215) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 1999 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share