OBJECTIVE: To develop methods for trend analysis of vital statistics maternal mortality data, taking into account changes in pregnancy question formats over time and between states, and to provide an overview of U.S. maternal mortality trends from 2000 to 2014.
METHODS: This observational study analyzed vital statistics maternal mortality data from all U.S. states in relation to the format and year of adoption of the pregnancy question. Correction factors were developed to adjust data from before the standard pregnancy question was adopted to promote accurate trend analysis. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze trends for groups of states with similar pregnancy questions.
RESULTS: The estimated maternal mortality rate (per 100,000 live births) for 48 states and Washington, DC (excluding California and Texas, analyzed separately) increased by 26.6%, from 18.8 in 2000 to 23.8 in 2014. California showed a declining trend, whereas Texas had a sudden increase in 2011–2012. Analysis of the measurement change suggests that U.S. rates in the early 2000s were higher than previously reported.
CONCLUSION: Despite the United Nations Millennium Development Goal for a 75% reduction in maternal mortality by 2015, the estimated maternal mortality rate for 48 states and Washington, DC, increased from 2000 to 2014; the international trend was in the opposite direction. There is a need to redouble efforts to prevent maternal deaths and improve maternity care for the 4 million U.S. women giving birth each year.
U.S. maternal mortality rates are higher than previously reported and are increasing.
Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; the Departments of Community Health Sciences and Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University Medical School, Palo Alto, California.
Corresponding author: Marian F. MacDorman, PhD, Maryland Population Research Center, 2015 Morrill Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; e-mail: email@example.com.
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.