Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2014 - Volume 124 - Issue 2, PART 2 > Early Hysteroscopic Removal of Intratubal Microinserts With...

ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS

If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.

Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000338
Case Report

Early Hysteroscopic Removal of Intratubal Microinserts With Urologic Stone Retrieval Forceps

Goldthwaite, Lisa M. MD; Edwards, Lindsay MD, PhD; Tocce, Kristina MD, MPH

Collapse Box

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nickel hypersensitivity reactions can be an indication for the removal of intratubal microinserts used for hysteroscopic sterilization. Although early removal can be attempted hysteroscopically, hysteroscopic grasping forceps may be inadequate to grasp deeply positioned inserts.

CASE: Three days after hysteroscopic sterilization, the patient presented with a rash consistent with a nickel hypersensitivity reaction. Ten days after placement, we successfully performed hysteroscopic removal of an intratubal microinsert with tri-prong urologic stone retrieval forceps after standard hysteroscopic grasping forceps was unable to reach the deeply positioned device. Within 36 hours of bilateral microinsert removal, all symptoms resolved.

CONCLUSION: In difficult cases, 1-mm tri-prong urologic stone retrieval forceps can be useful for early hysteroscopic removal of intratubal microinserts.

© 2014 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Login

ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS

If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics