You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

ACOG MEMBER SUBSCRIPTION ACCESS

If you are an ACOG Fellow and have not logged in or registered to Obstetrics & Gynecology, please follow these step-by-step instructions to access journal content with your member subscription.

Declines in Birth Weight and Fetal Growth Independent of Gestational Length

Morisaki, Naho MD, MPH; Esplin, M. Sean MD; Varner, Michael W. MD; Henry, Erick MPH; Oken, Emily MD, MPH

Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e318278d014
Original Research
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the decrease in birth weight of term singletons in the United States and elsewhere over the past decade, despite trends in common maternal characteristics expected to contribute toward an increase, is attributable to the simultaneous decrease in gestational length.

METHODS: Using data from Intermountain Healthcare, where a successful initiative reduced the number of early-term (37–38 weeks) elective deliveries, we examined trends in birth weight, being small for gestational age (SGA), and being large for gestational age (LGA) among 219,694 singleton neonates born between July 2000 and December 2008 at 37–41 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS: Over the 8.5 years, births through scheduled deliveries at 37–38 weeks decreased (9.7–4.4%), but overall scheduled deliveries increased (29–34%) and mean gestational age at birth (39.1 weeks) did not change. Mean birth weight (3,410–3,383 g) and LGA status (9.0–7.4%) both decreased, whereas SGA increased (7.5–8.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for maternal and newborn characteristics, birth weight decreased (−36 g; 95% confidence interval [CI] −31 to −42), especially among neonates born at 37–38 weeks of gestation (−40 g; 95% CI −30 to −49) or among those with medical indications for urgent deliveries (−48 g; 95% CI −34 to −63). Odds of being LGA decreased (0.77; 95% CI 0.73–0.82) and odds of being SGA increased (1.12; 95% CI 1.06–1.19).

CONCLUSION: Even in a population in which gestational length did not change, birth weight and fetal growth declined. Decrease not only in gestational length but also in fetal growth is likely to be contributing to the widely observed recent decrease in birth weight.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

In Brief

Birth weights and fetal growth decreased from 2000 to 2008 despite a sucessful initiative to minimize elective early-term deliveries and to maintain gestational length.

Author Information

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts; the Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; the Obesity Prevention Program, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts; the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah; and the Institute for Health Care Delivery, Research Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Corresponding author: Naho Morisaki, MD, MPH, Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo , 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan; e-mail: naho_morisaki@post.harvard.edu.

Supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (K24 HD069408).

Financial Disclosure: The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Dr. Scott, Editor-in-Chief of Obstetrics & Gynecology, was not involved in the review or decision to publish this article.

© 2013 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists