Home Articles & Issues Published Ahead-of-Print CME Collections ABOG MOC II Podcasts Videos Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2011 - Volume 118 - Issue 1 > Adhesion Barriers at Cesarean Delivery: Advertising Compared...
Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821d8438
Current Commentary

Adhesion Barriers at Cesarean Delivery: Advertising Compared With the Evidence

Albright, Catherine M. MD; Rouse, Dwight J. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Cesarean delivery, the most common surgery performed in the United States, is complicated by adhesion formation in 24–73% of cases. Because adhesions have potential sequelae, different synthetic adhesion barriers are currently heavily marketed as a means of reducing adhesion formation resultant from cesarean delivery. However, their use for this purpose has been studied in only two small, nonblinded and nonrandomized trials, both of which were underpowered and subject to bias. Neither demonstrated improvement in meaningful clinical outcomes. In the only cost-effectiveness analysis of adhesion barriers to date, the use of synthetic adhesion barriers was cost-effective only when the subsequent rate of small bowel obstruction was at least 2.4%, a rate far higher than that associated with cesarean delivery. In fact, intra-abdominal adhesions from prior cesarean delivery rarely cause maternal harm and have not been demonstrated to adversely affect perinatal outcome. Based on our review of the available literature, we think the use of adhesion barriers at the time of cesarean delivery would be ill-advised at the present time.

© 2011 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Login

Article Tools

Share