Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: comparison and combination with other noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of compensated liver cirrhosis

Pfeifer, Lukas; Adler, Werner; Zopf, Steffen; Siebler, Jürgen; Wildner, Dane; Goertz, Ruediger S.; Schellhaas, Barbara; Neurath, Markus F.; Strobel, Deike

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology: May 2017 - Volume 29 - Issue 5 - p 524–530
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000827
Original Articles: Liver Cirrhosis

Background and aims The aim of this study was to compare acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography with other noninvasive tests and to develop a new score for the assessment of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis.

Materials and methods B-mode ultrasound (including high-frequency liver surface evaluation), routine blood tests, ARFI quantification, and mini-laparoscopic liver evaluation were obtained in compensated patients scheduled for mini-laparoscopic biopsy. Our new cirrhosis score (CS) for the assessment of liver cirrhosis, based on a linear combination of ARFI, platelet (PLT), liver surface, and prothrombin index (PI), was calculated by linear discriminant analysis. Its performance was compared with ARFI-elastography, APRI, FIB-4, alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-ratio, PLT, and PI. For the diagnosis of cirrhosis, a combined gold standard (cirrhosis at histology and/or at macroscopic liver evaluation) was used.

Results In total, 171 patients, of whom 38 had compensated cirrhosis, were included. The CS was significantly better for the diagnosis of cirrhosis compared with ARFI (P=0.028), APRI (P=0.012), PLTs (P=0.013), PI (P=0.025), and ALT/AST ratio (P=0.001), but not the FIB-4 score (P=0.207), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.97], 0.86 (95% CI:0.79–0.93), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72–0.87), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.7–0.87), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73–0.89), 0.72 (95% CI:0.64–0.81), and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.8–0.93), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CS were 87%, 86%, 63%, and 96%, respectively. The FIB-4 score was significantly superior to the APRI score (P=0.041) and the ALT/AST ratio (P=0.011), with no significant difference from ARFI elastography (P=0.88) for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Conclusion Combining ARFI elastography with other noninvasive tests that are used routinely in the workup of patients with suspected liver disease can improve diagnostic accuracy for compensated liver cirrhosis as compared with ARFI elastography alone. The FIB-4 score showed an overall comparable diagnostic accuracy to ARFI-elastography for compensated cirrhosis.

aDepartment of Internal Medicine 1

bInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany

Correspondence to Lukas Pfeifer, MD, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany Tel: +49 9131 854 5096; fax: +49 9131 853 5252; e-mail: lukas.pfeifer@uk-erlangen.de

Received September 12, 2016

Accepted November 23, 2016

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.