Erratum: Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis for Direct and Indirect EffectsEpidemiology: January 2011 - Volume 22 - Issue 1 - p 134 doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181edae08 Errata Back to Top | Article Outline Reference VanderWeele TJ. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010;21:540–551. View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef In Appendix 1 of the paper “Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects,” the formula for the bias of the natural direct effect risk ratio was written as: and ought to have been written as Equation (Uncited) where Equation (Uncited) To obtain the simpler formulas in Appendix 1 for the natural direct and indirect effect risk ratio bias terms: Equation (Uncited) an additional assumption that vm = 1 for all m is necessary ie, M has no effect on Y when the unmeasured confounder is absent. The more general results are given in the eAppendix of the original paper. Equation (Uncited) Equation (Uncited) © 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Article Outline Reference Source Erratum: Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis for Direct and Indirect Effects Epidemiology. 22(1):134, January 2011. Full-Size Email + Favorites Export View in Gallery Email to a Colleague Colleague's E-mail is Invalid Your Name: (optional) Your Email: Colleague's Email: Separate multiple e-mails with a (;). Message: Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at Epidemiology. Send a copy to your email Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague. Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time. Add Item(s) to: An Existing Folder A New Folder Folder Name: Description: The item(s) has been successfully added to "".