Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2010 - Volume 21 - Issue 4 > Erratum: Negative Controls: A Tool for Detecting Confounding...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Epidemiology:
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e4bfd7
Erratum

Erratum: Negative Controls: A Tool for Detecting Confounding and Bias in Observational Studies

Free Access
Back to Top | Article Outline

Reference

Lipsitch M, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Cohen T. Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies. Epidemiology. 2010;21:383–388. View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef

The sentence beginning at the bottom of page 386 should read: “If A and B are perfectly U-comparable and B does not cause Y, then a null finding of B-Y means that the A-Y association is unbiased.”

In the published version, the phrase “null finding of B-Y” was written incorrectly as “null finding of A-N.”

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Twitter  Facebook

Login

Article Tools

Share