Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
You currently have no recent searches
Connor, Jennie; Ameratunga, Shanthi; Jackson, Rod
School of Population Health University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand firstname.lastname@example.org
It is indisputable that the injury burden due to road traffic is a huge public health problem and that epidemiologists have made a contribution to control of road traffic injury, largely in rich countries.
However in discussing the lack of specialized injury epidemiology training programs, Dr. Robertson1 has failed to acknowledge the enormous advances in the understanding of epidemiologic methods in general in the last 20 years or so, and their increasing application to injury prevention. Whether or not one sees injury epidemiology as a separate discipline, this line of research requires a thorough understanding of epidemiologic principles and study design. In the area of case-control studies in particular, our understanding has been revolutionized by the work of “modern” epidemiologists. This has provided opportunities for the more rigorous study of component causes of injury in populations, as the case-control design and its variants are particularly well suited to studying uncommon events where at least some contributing factors are transient.
The commentary suggests that the use of unmatched controls is a major weakness of our study. Dr. Robertson misses the point of our research.2 The controls are a good representation of the underlying study population, selected in proportion to their driving exposure. While matching may improve efficiency, this approach would make it impossible to estimate the population attributable risks or the effects of the matching factors. Our use of representative controls does not preclude anything that could be done in a matched study.
Robertson’s description of modern methods as “intellectual fun” also misses the point. Improving methodology is central to improving the reliability of results. Descriptive studies serve a range of useful functions, as all epidemiologists know, but reliably quantifying contributing causes of injury is not one of them.
© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at Epidemiology.
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection