Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Podcasts Videos For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2002 - Volume 13 - Issue 3 > First Trimester Ultrasound Scans and Left-handedness
Epidemiology:
Letters

First Trimester Ultrasound Scans and Left-handedness

Kieler, Helle; Cnattingius, Sven; Palmgren, Juni; Haglund, Bengt; Axelsson, Ove

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Medical Epidemiology

Karolinska Institutet

PO Box 281

SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Helle.Kieler@mep.ki.se

(address correspondence to: Helle Kieler)

The Center for Epidemiology

National Board of Health and Welfare

Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Women’s and Children’s Health

Uppsala University

Uppsala, Sweden

To the Editor:

We recently reported an association of prenatal ultrasound exposure in gestational weeks 17 and 32 with left-handedness. 1 Teratogenic substances often act during limited periods of development, and we speculated whether the second trimester (17-week) scan rather than the later (32-week) scan caused the increase in prevalence of left-handedness.

During recent years, first trimester scans have been used more commonly. Hypothetically first trimester scans may be less harmful than second trimester scans, as the inborn ability of the fetal brain to repair damage or to replace dead cells can act over a longer period. 2 This letter reports an analysis of whether first trimester scans increase the risk of left-handedness.

One of the hospitals excluded from the previous study 1 was the university hospital in Linköping. The main reasons for excluding Linköping were their policy with first trimester scans and limited written documentation on their scanning policy. 3 In the initial study we found it crucial to apply this stringent approach concerning documentation on ultrasound programs for the hospitals included. However, because our data might disclose adverse effects from first trimester scans and we have now supplementary information on the scanning program in Linköping from the physician who organized it (Anders Selbing, personal communication, 2001), such stringency might be disregarded.

Routine scans were started in Linköping on January 1, 1978, and from that point in time almost all pregnant women were scanned. A Diasonograph NE 4200 static scanner (Nuclear Enterprises Ltd., Edinburgh, UK) was used. As the scans were generally performed in gestational week 12, men born in Linköping from January through July 1978 were considered to have not been exposed to ultrasound, while men born from August through December 1978 were considered to have been exposed. In Sweden, all males around the age of 18 are enrolled to be tested for military service. Until 1998 a majority of the enrollees were tested as to whether they shoot left-handed or right-handed; these data on left-handedness were obtained through the National Service Register. In the analyses we compared left-handedness among men born in Linköping with men born in 48 hospitals that did not practice ultrasound scanning before 1980. 1 Only men born as singletons in 1978 and enrolled for military service testing in 1996 to 1997 were included.

In these additional analyses we found an increased risk of left-handedness (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0–2.1) among men born in Linköping in August – December 1978 (ie, those presumably exposed to a first trimester ultrasound scan) but not among those born there in January – July 1978 (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.6–1.3) (Table 1). The results are in agreement with previous studies on ultrasound exposure and left-handedness. 1,4,5 It is, however, important to note that the results are based on a relatively small cohort and should be confirmed in future studies. As there is now a tendency to perform ultrasound scans earlier in pregnancy we find it important to publish our results indicating that first trimester scans, similar to second trimester scans, may increase the risk of left-handedness.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Helle Kieler

Sven Cnattingius

Juni Palmgren

Bengt Haglund

Ove Axelsson

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Kieler H, Cnattingius S, Haglund B, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Sinistrality-a side-effect of prenatal sonography: A comparative study of young men. Epidemiology 2001; 12: 618–623.

2. Mole R. Possible hazards of imaging and Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics. Birth 1986; 13 (suppl): 23–33.

3. Selbing A. The pregnant population and a fetal crown-rump length screening program. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 161–164.

4. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, Hugdahl K, Bakketeig LS. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. BMJ 1993; 307 (6897): 159–164.

5. Kieler H, Axelsson O, Haglund B, Nilsson S, Salvesen KA. Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children’s subsequent handedness. Early Hum Dev 1998; 50: 233–245.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 9 time(s).

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Torloni, MR; Vedmedovska, N; Merialdi, M; Betran, AP; Allen, T; Gonzalez, R; Platt, LD
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 33(5): 599-608.
10.1002/uog.6328
CrossRef
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Ultrasound exposure of the foetal chick brain: effects on learning and memory
Schneider-Kolsky, ME; Ayobi, Z; Lombardo, P; Brown, D; Kedang, B; Gibbs, ME
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 27(7): 677-683.
10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.07.007
CrossRef
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Fetal ultra sound - Mechanical effects
Stratmeyer, ME; Greenleaf, JF; Dalecki, D; Salvesen, KA
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 27(4): 597-605.

Prenatal Diagnosis
The safety of obstetrical ultrasound: a review
Houston, LE; Odibo, AO; Macones, GA
Prenatal Diagnosis, 29(): 1204-1212.
10.1002/pd.2392
CrossRef
Early Human Development
Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth?
Bellieni, CV; Buonocore, G; Bagnoli, F; Cordelli, DM; Gasparre, O; Calonaci, F; Filardi, G; Merola, A; Petraglia, F
Early Human Development, 81(8): 689-693.
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.05.004
CrossRef
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
Epidemiological studies on adverse effects of prenatal ultrasound - Which are the challenges?
Kieler, H
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 93(): 301-308.
10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.022
CrossRef
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ultrasound and adverse effects
Kieler, H; Cnattingius, S; Haglund, B; Palmgren, J; Axelsson, O
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 20(1): 101-102.

Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
Epidemiological prenatal ultrasound studies
Salvesen, KA
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 93(): 295-300.
10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.013
CrossRef
Epidemiology
Prenatal Ultrasound Scanning and the Risk of Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses
Stålberg, K; Haglund, B; Axelsson, O; Cnattingius, S; Hultman, CM; Kieler, H
Epidemiology, 18(5): 577-582.
10.1097/EDE.0b013e318126c102
PDF (233) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Twitter  Facebook

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share