You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

How Much Are We Missing in SNP-by-SNP Analyses of Genome-wide Association Studies?

Shi, Min; Weinberg, Clarice R.

Epidemiology:
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31822ffbe7
Genetics
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have discovered common genetic variants associated with susceptibility for several complex diseases, but they have been unfruitful for many others. Typically, analysis is done “agnostically,” by considering one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at a time and controlling the overall type I error rate by correcting for multiple testing. Such one-at-a-time analyses may be inadequate for screening genes under realistic causal models. We use oral clefting as a disease model to develop a range of toy example scenarios: risk might involve only genes, or genes and exposure, or genes, exposure, and their supermultiplicative interaction. These examples illustrate how dramatically important genetic variants can be obscured by a one-SNP-at-a-time analysis when multiple biologic pathways and multiple genes jointly influence etiology. These examples highlight the need for better methods for gene-by-environment and gene-by-gene analyses.

Author Information

From the Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Submitted 9 February 2011; accepted 14 June 2011; posted 30 August 2011.

Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES040007; Z01-ES45002).

Correspondence: Min Shi, Biostatistics Branch, A3–03 101/A315, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: shi2@niehs.nih.gov.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.