You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Relative Excess Risk Due to Interaction: Resampling-based Confidence Intervals

Nie, Leia; Chu, Haitaob; Li, Fengc; Cole, Stephen R.d

Epidemiology:
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e09b0b
Methods: Original Article
Abstract

Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) has been used to quantify the joint effects of 2 exposures in epidemiology. However, the construction of confidence intervals (CIs) for RERI is complicated by sparse cells. Assuming that the data contain no zero cells, here we propose constructing CIs for RERI using nonparametric and parametric bootstrap methods with a continuity correction, and compare these proposed methods to existing methods using 3 empirical examples and Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show that, when cell counts are not sparse, CIs resulting from the explored bootstrap methods are generally acceptable in terms of CI coverage and length, although computationally more demanding than existing methods. However, when cell counts are sparse, the proposed bootstrap methods using a continuity correction outperform existing methods and continue to provide acceptable CIs. The continuity correction is needed for the explored bootstrap methods to provide acceptable CIs because resampled data sets may contain zero cells even when the observed data do not.

Author Information

From the aDivision of Biometrics IV, Office of Biometrics/OTS/CDER/FDA, Silver Spring, MD; bDepartment of Biostatistics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; cDivision of Biometrics II, Office of Biometrics/OTC/CDER/FDA, Silver Spring, MD; and dDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Submitted 12 August 2009; accepted 7 December 2009.

Supported in part by the Lineberger Cancer Center Core Grant CA16086 from the US National Cancer Institute and by R03-AI-071763, R01-AA-01759, and P30-AI-50410.

Supplemental digital content is available through direct URL citations in the HTML and PDF versions of this article (www.epidem.com).

Correspondence: Lei Nie, Division of Biometrics IV, Office of Biometrics/OTS/CDER/FDA, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. E-mail: lei.nie@fda.hhs.gov.

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.