Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2009 - Volume 20 - Issue 6 > On the Distinction Between Interaction and Effect Modificati...
Epidemiology:
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181ba333c
Methods: Original Article

On the Distinction Between Interaction and Effect Modification

VanderWeele, Tyler J.

Supplemental Author Material
Erratum

Erratum

Reference

VanderWeele TJ. On the distinction between interaction and effect modification. Epidemiology. 2009;20:863–871.

The final corrected galley proofs were not used in the published version of this paper. Wherever 1 or 0 appears in the text following a subscript “q,” these numbers should be subscript to “q.”

In Equation 1 (p. 867), the subscript q in E[Deq|Q = q] ought not to have been present. An earlier erratum for this equation that noted this original error also introduced a new error. Equation 1 (p. 867) for the marginal structural model for effect modification should have read:

Epidemiology. 22(5):752, September 2011.

Collapse Box

Abstract

This paper contrasts the concepts of interaction and effect modification using a series of examples. Interaction and effect modification are formally defined within the counterfactual framework. Interaction is defined in terms of the effects of 2 interventions whereas effect modification is defined in terms of the effect of one intervention varying across strata of a second variable. Effect modification can be present with no interaction; interaction can be present with no effect modification. There are settings in which it is possible to assess effect modification but not interaction, or to assess interaction but not effect modification. The analytic procedures for obtaining estimates of effect modification parameters and interaction parameters using marginal structural models are compared and contrasted. A characterization is given of the settings in which interaction and effect modification coincide.

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Twitter  Facebook

Login

Article Tools

Share