Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
You currently have no recent searches
Kalmar, A. F.; De Smet, J. M.; Annaert, E. L.; De Regge, M.; Calle, P. A.; Monsieurs, K. G.
Ghent University Hospital, Emergency Department, Gent, Belgium and University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Anaesthesiology, Groningen, Netherlands
Background and Goal of Study: In the latest Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ref), the relationship between compression rate and compression depth is considered to be a knowledge gap. In order to characterize this relationship, we performed an observational study in pre‐hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Materials and Methods: In patients undergoing out‐of‐hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by health care professionals, chest compression rate and depth were recorded using an accelerometer (E‐series monitor‐defibrillator, Zoll, USA). The monitor provided real‐time corrective feedback for compression rates < 80/min and for depth < 4 cm. Compression depth was analyzed for rates < 80/min, 80‐120/min and >120/min. A difference in compression depth ≥5 mm was considered potentially clinically significant.
Results and Discussion: Thirty‐one consecutive patients were analyzed (50375 compressions, on average 1625 per patient). Of all compressions 2% were < 80/min, 63% between 80‐120/min and 35% >120/min. Mean compression depth for rates 80‐120/min was 4.5 cm (SD=1) compared to 3.5 cm (SD=1) for compressions >120/min (P< 0.001; see Figure). In 20 out of 31 (64%) patients a statistically significant lower depth was observed for rates > 120/min compared to rates 80‐120/min, in 10 out of 31 (32%) this difference was also clinically significant. There was no difference between the mean depth of compressions < 80/min and the mean depth of compressions 80‐120/min.
Conclusion: Compression rates >120/min were associated with a lower compression depth. The observation that compression depth is lower with increased compression rates underscores the importance on feedback of rate and depth during CPR.
© 2011 European Society of Anaesthesiology
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA).
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection
Article Level Metrics