Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
You currently have no recent searches
Kessler, P.; Brähler, M.; Bingold, T.; Wilke, H. J.; Strouhal, U.
Center of Anaesthesiology, J.W. Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Background and goal of the study: General anaesthesia can be achieved by administration of a volatile anaesthetic alone (VIMA = volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia) or by a total intravenous technique (TIVA) . Our study compared both techniques during induction and emergence from anaesthesia.
Materials and methods: After ethics committee approval, 142 ASA I-II patients received randomly either VIMA (n = 70) or TIVA (n = 72). Induction in the VIMA group was achieved by inhalation of a mixture of 8% sevoflurane, 50 Vol% N2O and 42 Vol% O2. Anaesthesia was maintained with 2-3 MAC sevoflurane, 66 Vol% N2O and 31% O2. TIVA consisted of remifentanil (Induction: 0.3 μg kg−1 min−1, maintenance: 0.1-0.3 μg kg−1 min−1) and propofol (induction: 4 μg mL−1, maintenance: 2.5-3.5 μg mL−1). Adjustment of anaesthetic depth was guided clinically. We determined time required for induction and emergence and observed side-effects.
Results and discussion: Demographic data and operative times were comparable; however, there was a significant difference with regard to incidence of PONV and shivering. TABLE
Conclusions: Both techniques are suitable for gynaecological procedures. However, due to a lower incidence of PONV and shivering during the immediate postanaesthesia period, TIVA is superior to VIMA.
The abstracts published in this supplement have been typeset from camera-ready copies prepared by the authors. Every effort has been made to reproduce faithfully the abstracts as submitted. These abstracts have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the European Society of Anaesthesiologists and have not been subjected to review nor editing by the European Journal Of Anaesthesiology. However, no responsibility is assumed by the organisers for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of the rapid advances in medical sciences, we recommend that independent verification of diagnoses and drug doses should be made.
© 2001 European Society of Anaesthesiology
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA).
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection
Article Level Metrics