Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2008 - Volume 25 - Issue 5 > Comparative study of pressure‐ and volume‐controlled ventila...
European Journal of Anaesthesiology:
doi: 10.1017/S0265021508003554
Original Article

Comparative study of pressure‐ and volume‐controlled ventilation on pulse pressure variation in a model of hypovolaemia in rabbits

Fonseca, E. B.*; Otsuki, D. A.*; Fantoni, D. T.; Bliacheriene, F.; Auler, J. O. C.

Collapse Box


Background and objective: Dynamic indices represented by systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation have been demonstrated to be more accurate than filling pressures in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, the literature is scarce concerning the impact of different ventilatory modes on these indices. We hypothesized that systolic pressure variation or pulse pressure variation could be affected differently by volume‐controlled ventilation and pressure‐controlled ventilation in an experimental model, during normovolaemia and hypovolaemia.

Method: Thirty‐two anaesthetized rabbits were randomly allocated into four groups according to ventilatory modality and volaemic status where G1‐ConPCV was the pressure‐controlled ventilation control group, G2‐HemPCV was associated with haemorrhage, G3‐ConVCV was the volume‐controlled ventilation control group and G4‐HemVCV was associated with haemorrhage. In the haemorrhage groups, blood was removed in two stages: 15% of the estimated blood volume withdrawal at M1, and, 30 min later, an additional 15% at M2. Data were submitted to analysis of variance for repeated measures; a value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: At M0 (baseline), no significant differences were observed among groups. At M1, dynamic parameters differed significantly among the control and hypovolaemic groups (P < 0.05) but not between ventilation modes. However, when 30% of the estimated blood volume was removed (M2), dynamic parameters became significantly higher in animals under volume‐controlled ventilation when compared with those under pressure‐controlled ventilation.

Conclusions: Under normovolaemia and moderate haemorrhage, dynamic parameters were not influenced by either ventilatory modalities. However, in the second stage of haemorrhage (30%), animals in volume‐controlled ventilation presented higher values of systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation when compared with those submitted to pressure‐controlled ventilation.

© 2008 European Society of Anaesthesiology


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.