You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management

Meissner, W.*; Ullrich, K.*; Zwacka, S.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology:
doi: 10.1017/S026502150500205X
Original Article
Abstract

Background and objective:: Quality of acute pain management is far from being satisfactory. These deficits are not caused by the complexity of the medical problem but by difficulties in organization and hospital structures, sand procedures. Continuous quality improvement is a recommended tool to overcome such difficulties and to increase quality in the long run. This study reports the implementation of benchmarking‐based continuous quality improvement to improve postoperative pain management at a university hospital.

Methods:: A specialised pain nurse interviewed patients of three surgical departments on the first day after surgery, and continuously assessed process and outcome quality parameters. A multidisciplinary team of anaesthetists, surgeons, nurses and pharmacists implemented a regular procedure of data analysing and internal benchmarking. Results and suggested improvements were fed back to the healthcare teams.

Results:: From 1998 to 2002, 6756 patients were assessed. Average pain on ambulation and maximal pain were 3.7 ± 2.4 and 5.0 ± 2.5 (mean ± SD) on a 11‐point numeric rating scale. Pain intensity at rest was 1.9 ± 1.8. Over time, pain intensity on ambulation decreased (P = 0.022) whereas maximal pain and pain at rest remained unchanged. There was an increase in the number of patients who received non‐opioid analgesia (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:: A continuous quality improvement process could be established and is now successfully used in clinical routine. Cornerstones of this project were frequent assessments of process and outcome parameters, regular benchmarking and implementation of feedback mechanisms. Changes in organization of medical management and multidisciplinary teamwork seem to be more important than medical or technical aspects.

Author Information

*Friedrich‐Schiller‐University, Department of Anaesthesiolgy and Intensive Care, Jena, Germany

Friedrich‐Schiller‐University, Department of Nursing, Jena, Germany

Correspondence to: Winfried Meissner, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Friedrich‐Schiller‐University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, D‐07740 Jena, Germany. E‐mail: meissner@med.uni‐jena.de; Tel: +36 41 9323353; Fax: +36 41 9323152

Accepted for publication 27 September 2005

First published online January 2006

© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology