Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2006 - Volume 23 - Issue 2 > Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in...
European Journal of Anaesthesiology:
doi: 10.1017/S026502150500205X
Original Article

Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management

Meissner, W.*; Ullrich, K.*; Zwacka, S.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background and objective:: Quality of acute pain management is far from being satisfactory. These deficits are not caused by the complexity of the medical problem but by difficulties in organization and hospital structures, sand procedures. Continuous quality improvement is a recommended tool to overcome such difficulties and to increase quality in the long run. This study reports the implementation of benchmarking‐based continuous quality improvement to improve postoperative pain management at a university hospital.

Methods:: A specialised pain nurse interviewed patients of three surgical departments on the first day after surgery, and continuously assessed process and outcome quality parameters. A multidisciplinary team of anaesthetists, surgeons, nurses and pharmacists implemented a regular procedure of data analysing and internal benchmarking. Results and suggested improvements were fed back to the healthcare teams.

Results:: From 1998 to 2002, 6756 patients were assessed. Average pain on ambulation and maximal pain were 3.7 ± 2.4 and 5.0 ± 2.5 (mean ± SD) on a 11‐point numeric rating scale. Pain intensity at rest was 1.9 ± 1.8. Over time, pain intensity on ambulation decreased (P = 0.022) whereas maximal pain and pain at rest remained unchanged. There was an increase in the number of patients who received non‐opioid analgesia (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:: A continuous quality improvement process could be established and is now successfully used in clinical routine. Cornerstones of this project were frequent assessments of process and outcome parameters, regular benchmarking and implementation of feedback mechanisms. Changes in organization of medical management and multidisciplinary teamwork seem to be more important than medical or technical aspects.

© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.