Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2012 - Volume 28 - Issue 1 > Patients’ Perspectives on Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Reeva...
Journal of ECT:
doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31822d796c

Patients’ Perspectives on Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Reevaluation of the Review by Rose et al on Memory Loss After Electroconvulsive Therapy

Bergsholm, Per MD, PhD

Collapse Box


Objectives: In 2003, based on a review of 7 studies, Rose et al concluded that at least one third of patients report significant memory loss 6 months or more after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, few details on the included studies were given. The present study evaluates factors that may have influenced the results.

Methods: The 7 studies were scrutinized as to the 6-month assessment criterion, whether the data represent ECT-treated patients in general, specification and significance of the memory loss, stimulus type, and electrode placement.

Results: In 3 studies, the 6-month inclusion criterion was not met, including 1 study with 98% satisfied patients and 1 study with only 37% valid response rate. Two other studies selected individuals from user/advocacy groups generally biased against ECT and were probably overlapping. The significance of memory problems was not mentioned in any of the studies. Two studies reported that 30% and 55% of patients treated with bilateral ECT in the 1970s felt they had persistent memory gaps around the time of treatment, but the long-obsolete sine wave stimulus type was used. The results mostly concerned bilateral ECT, whereas unilateral ECT seemed to cause little complaints.

Conclusions: Data used by Rose et al are severely flawed, making their results inconclusive and misleading.

© 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.