You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Comparison of Antidepressant Effects Between Brief and Ultrabrief Pulse Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy: Brief Report of a Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Mayur, Prashanth MBBS, DPM, DNB, FRANZCP*; Harris, Anthony FRANZCP, PhD

Journal of ECT:
doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318218945e
Online Articles
Abstract

Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatments with briefer pulse widths have recently shown promise.

Methods: Consenting patients with major depression were randomized in a double-blind protocol into 1-millisecond brief pulse (n = 10) or 0.3-millisecond ultrabrief pulse (n = 12) right unilateral at thrice-weekly, 6 times the threshold dose treatments at identical charge rates.

Results: After 8 treatments, the change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale was mean = 22.1 (SE, 4.8) for brief pulse and mean = 24.9 (SE, 4.2) for ultrabrief pulse ECT. The mean difference was 2.8 (95% confidence interval = −10.5 to 16.1; P = 0.7).

Conclusions: Although inconclusive because of small sample size (type II error), ultrashort pulse widths appear to be as effective as standard pulse ECT.

Author Information

From the *Mood Disorders Unit, Cumberland Hospital, Westmead; and †Department of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Received for publication December 21, 2010; accepted February 14, 2011.

Reprints: Prashanth Mayur, MBBS, DPM, DNB, FRANZCP, Cumberland Hospital, Locked Bag 7118, Parramatta, CBD, New South Wales 2124, Australia (e-mail: prashanth_mayur@wsahs.nsw.gov.au).

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.