Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2002 - Volume 24 - Issue 5 > Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay for Top...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring:
Article

Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay for Topiramate Analysis in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid: Validation and Comparison With Fluorescence-Polarization Immunoassay

Christensen, Jakob*† ; Højskov, Carsten S.‡; Poulsen, Jørgen H.‡

Collapse Box

Abstract

Summary: The authors report the development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay (LC/MS/MS assay) for the analysis of topiramate (2,3:4,5-bis-o-(-1-methyl)-β-D-fructopyranose sulfamate) in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Comparison is made with the commercially available fluorescence-polarization immunoassay (FPIA).

LC/MS/MS Assay: Using the internal standard, 1,2:3,4-bis-o-(1-methylethylidene-α-D-galactopyranose sulfamate), a structural isomer, the calibration curve in plasma was linear in the concentration range of 0.02–20.0 mg/L (r2 = 0.9998). The coefficients of variation in plasma were ≤ 3%, and the accuracy ranged from 100% to 101% in the therapeutically relevant concentration range of 0.4–16.0 mg/L. In CSF, the mean recovery was 98%, and there was linearity between the nominal and the estimated concentration in the range of 1.5–20.0 mg/L (r2 = 0.9996).

FPIA: The calibration curve was linear in the concentration interval of 1.6–24.3 mg/L (r2 = 0.9994), and the mean recovery was 96%. Accuracy in plasma was 99– 104%, and precision was 3.2–6.0%. In CSF, there was linearity between the nominal concentration and the estimated concentration in the range of 1.5–20.0 mg/L (r2 = 0.9995), and the mean recovery was 100%.

Comparison Between FPIA and LC/MS/MS: There was a high correlation between the FPIA and the LC/MS/MS assay (r2 = 0.9965 in plasma and r2 = 0.9996 in CSF, P < 0.001 for both). In plasma and CSF, the two methods showed equal results, evaluated as the ratio between the two methods (plasma: median ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–1.02, paired-sample t test, P = 0.79; and CSF: median ratio = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.99–1.02, paired-sample t test, P = 0.75). The coefficient of variation on the ratios between the two methods had similar levels: 5% in plasma and 3% in CSF.

Conclusion: The new LC/MS/MS assay has favorable characteristics, being highly precise and accurate. FPIA also proved precise and accurate, and there was a high agreement with the LC/MS/MS assay in plasma and CSF. Either method displayed sufficient precision and accuracy and may thus be implemented in daily routine.

© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.