Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2012 - Volume 34 - Issue 2 > Quantification of Tacrolimus and Three Demethylated Metaboli...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring:
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31824b0bfb
Original Article

Quantification of Tacrolimus and Three Demethylated Metabolites in Human Whole Blood Using LC–ESI–MS/MS

Dubbelboer, Ilse R. MSc*; Pohanka, Anton PhD; Said, Rana PhD; Rosenborg, Staffan MD, PhD; Beck, Olof PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: A bioalanytical method for the quantification of tacrolimus (TAC) and 3 metabolites, 13-O, 15-O, and 31-O-demethylated TAC (M-I, M-III, and M-II) in human whole blood using liquid chromatography, electrospray ionization, tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI–MS/MS) was developed and validated.

Method: The analytes were extracted from 85 μL of blood by protein precipitation followed by solid-phase extraction and a concentration step. The analytes and the internal standard (IS, ascomycin) were separated on a C18 column using a slow gradient mobile phase elution, with an analysis time of 3.3 minutes. The ammonium-adduct ions with transitions of m/z 821.5 > 768.7 (TAC), 807.5 > 754.7 (M-I, M-III, M-II), and 809.4 > 756.7 (IS) were measured in selected reaction monitoring mode using electrospray ionization.

Results: Measuring ranges were 0.1–50 ng/mL for M-II, M-III, and TAC and 0.15–39 ng/mL for M-I. Imprecision in quantification was <20% for all analytes, whereas accuracy was within ±20%. Recovery was calculated to be >50% for all analytes. The sample's stability was proven for 1 month at −20°C and 72 hours at room temperature. Three freeze–thaw cycles had no significant effect on the stability. The prepared samples were stable at least 16 hours at 8°C. Analysis of 53 patient samples resulted in average concentrations of 7.2 for TAC, 0.8 for M-I, 0.4 for M-III, and 0.2 ng/mL for M-II. The total metabolite concentration was 17% (4%–52%) of the TAC concentration. The TAC concentration measured by LC–MS/MS was 36.1% ± 27.1% lower than by immunochemical (enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique) analysis. When adding the metabolite crossreactivity in the presence of TAC, the difference between the 2 methods was still 29.8% ± 28.3%, indicating that the overestimation of TAC concentration of enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique compared with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry cannot only be ascribed to the demethylated metabolites.

Conclusions: An LC–ESI–MS/MS method for the quantitative analysis of TAC and 3 metabolites, using a 2-step sample preparation was successfully developed, validated, and applied on 53 patient samples.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.