Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2012 - Volume 34 - Issue 2 > Analytical Performance of a New Liquid Chromatography/Tandem...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring:
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318246d515
Short Communication

Analytical Performance of a New Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for Determination of Everolimus Concentrations in Whole Blood

McMillin, Gwendolyn A. PhD*; Johnson-Davis, Kamisha PhD*; Dasgupta, Amitava PhD*

Erratum

Erratum

On page 223 of this article in the April 2012 issue, there was an error in stating: “High purity argon was used as the collision gas.” Nitrogen should have been listed as the collision gas. The author regrets this error.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 34(4):485, August 2012.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Abstract: The immunosuppressant everolimus was recently approved for prophylactic use in the United States, to prevent organ rejection in adult kidney transplant recipients. The currently accepted therapeutic range for everolimus is 3–8 ng/mL. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) using predose EDTA whole blood samples is required to optimize dose. We describe a simple extraction method and analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to support routine TDM of everolimus. Samples were prepared by protein precipitation and filtration. The first quadrupole was set to select the ammonium adducts

Equation (Uncited)
Equation (Uncited)
Image Tools

of everolimus (m/z 975.62) and rapamycin-d3 (m/z 934.70), the internal standard. The second quadrupole was used as a collision chamber, and the third quadrupole was then used to select characteristic product ions of everolimus (m/z 908.50 and 890.50) and rapamycin-d3 (m/z 864.60 and 846.50). The method had an analytical measurement range of 2.0–150 ng/mL. Total imprecision, expressed as percent coefficient of variation (mean concentration), was 19.1% (3.3 ng/mL), 10.6% (5.9 ng/mL), 8.1% (19.2 ng/mL), 5.7% (25.8 ng/mL), and 9.1% (34.2 ng/mL). The new method was compared with 2 other everolimus methods also based on LC-MS/MS, with 64 residual patient specimens. Agreement, based on simple linear regression, was excellent. Method A comparison: y = 0.96x − 1.12 (r = 0.99), n = 20, 2.5–44.7 ng/mL. Method B comparison: y = 0.96x + 0.49 (r = 0.99), n = 44, 2.1–85.6 ng/mL. We conclude that this method could support TDM of everolimus for a wide range of clinical indications.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.