Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Quantitative Analysis of Face and Neck Skin Tightening by Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Asians

Lu, Pei-Hsuan MD*; Yang, Chih-Hsun MD; Chang, Ya-Ching MD

doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001181
Original Articles

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) on facial and neck laxity were largely based on masked physician assessments, histological analysis, and safety profile. More quantitative studies are needed.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 800 treatment lines of MFU-V on skin tightening effect of face and neck in Asians using 2 quantitative analysis systems at 0, 90, and 180 days after treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 25 subjects were recruited in this prospective study. Subjects were treated with MFU-V to the face and neck using 2 different transducers: 4 MHz, 4.5-mm focal depth and 7 MHz, 3.0-mm focal depth with total 800 lines. The subjects were evaluated by skin complexion analysis and 3-dimensional imaging system at 0, 90, and 180 days. Mean brow height lift and submental lift were calculated.

RESULTS: All 25 subjects completed treatment and received the follow-up examinations at 90 and 180 days. Two of the 25 subjects were male. Mean patient age was 53.3 years (range: 39.8–61.1 years). Wrinkles, texture, and pores were 3 variables relevant to analysis of skin laxity. Only mean wrinkles score reduction at 90 days was statistically significant (p = .0222). There was a mean 0.47 mm brow lift at 90 days (p = .0165), but there was a 0.12 mm decrease in brow height compared to baseline at 180 days (p = .6494). At 90 days, a mean 26.44 mm2 submental lift was noted (p = .0217). And at 180 days, a mean 13.76 mm2 submental lift was noted (p = .243).

CONCLUSION: This study showed that the most prominent change after the 800-line MFU-V treatments in Asians was the significant submental lift at 90 days. Other noninvasive or minimally invasive treatment modalities can be considered to combine with MFU-V for the optimal treatment response. Additional MFU-V treatments can be considered 3 months after the first treatment.

*Taipei Arts Plastic Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan;

Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ya-Ching Chang, MD, Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199 Tun-Hwa North Road, Taipei 10507, Taiwan, or e-mail: ycchang@cgmh.org.tw

The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

© 2017 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website