Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Fistula in Ano: Lessons Learned From a Decade of Experience

Malakorn, Songphol M.D.; Sammour, Tarik M.B.Ch.B., F.R.A.C.S., Ph.D.; Khomvilai, Supakij M.D.; Chowchankit, Irin M.D.; Gunarasa, Shankar M.B.B.S.; Kanjanasilp, Prapon M.D.; Thiptanakij, Charnjiroj M.D.; Rojanasakul, Arun M.D.

doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000880
Original Contributions: Anorectal Disease
Denotes Associated Video Abstract
Denotes Twitter Account Access

BACKGROUND: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is a well-described sphincter-preserving technique for the management of fistula in ano. In 2007, we reported our early experience demonstrating a primary success rate of 94.4%. These findings have since been supported by several short-term studies, but long-term results and secondary cure rates after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract failure remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report a 10-year experience of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract with extended long-term follow-up.

DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of single-center data from May 2006 to October 2010 was performed.

SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.

PATIENTS: All patients with primary or recurrent fistula in ano who underwent a ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were included. Patients with malignancy, incontinent patients, and patients with rectovaginal fistula were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healing as defined by the absence of symptoms with no visible external opening on clinical examination. Follow-up was continued until May 2016.

RESULTS: In total, 251 patients were identified, with a primary healing rate of 87.65% at a median follow-up of 71 months. The healing rates for low transsphincteric, intersphincteric, high transsphincteric, semihorseshoe, and horseshoe fistulas were 92.1%, 85.2%, 60.0%, 89.0%, and 40.0%. Of the 42 patients who had an unhealed fistula after previous non-ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract surgery, 38 (90.48%) healed after the first attempt at ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. There were 31 patients with unhealed fistulas after the first ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. Of these, 3 healed spontaneously, and the rest underwent either repeat ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, fistulotomy (if the recurrence was intersphincteric), or simple curettage (if no internal opening was found). Ultimately, only 2 of the original 251 patients remained unhealed, and there was no change in subjective continence status after surgery.

LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSION: Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract is an effective technique for the treatment of fistula in ano, including recurrent or unhealed fistula after other procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A387.

Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Funding/Support: None

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

Podium presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, WA, June 10 to 14, 2017.

Correspondence: Songphol Malakorn, M.D., Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand 10330. E-mail: smalakorn@gmail.com

© 2017 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons