You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Extended Sacropelvic Resection For Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Can It Be Done Safely and With Good Oncologic Outcomes?

Colibaseanu, Dorin T. M.D.1; Dozois, Eric J. M.D.1; Mathis, Kellie L. M.D.1; Rose, Peter S. M.D.2; Ugarte, Maria L. Martinez M.D.1; Abdelsattar, Zaid M. M.D.1; Williams, Michael D. D.O.1; Larson, David W. M.D.1

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum:
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000015
Original Contributions: Colorectal/Anal Neoplasia

BACKGROUND: A multimodality approach to patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer that includes surgery is associated with a significant survival advantage when tumor-free margins are achieved. Patients with advanced tumors will require extended sacropelvic resection to optimize oncologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and oncologic outcomes of extended sacropelvic resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer at our institution.

DESIGN: A retrospective review identified 406 patients who had surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer between 1997 and 2007. From this group, all patients who underwent a curative-intent sacropelvic resection were analyzed.

SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at an academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS: Thirty patients (24 male) were identified. Median age was 59 years (range, 25–84). Operations were performed for a first local recurrence (n = 24), a second recurrence (n = 5) and for a third recurrence (n = 1).

INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-six patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation, and 20 received intraoperative radiation therapy. All patients underwent extended sacropelvic resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) surgical complications. Overall and disease-free survivals were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

RESULTS: Margin-negative resection was achieved in 93%. The most proximal level of spinal transection was the fourth lumbar space, and 4 patients underwent lower extremity amputation. There was no mortality, and early morbidity was seen in 76%. Median follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 2 months to 10.8 years). Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 86% and 46%. Disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 79% and 43%.

LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS: We found extended sacropelvic resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer to be feasible and safe with overall and disease-free survival rates in comparison with survival rates seen in patients undergoing nonsacropelvic resections for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

In Brief

See related article on p. 1

Author Information

1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Podium presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Phoenix, AZ, April 27 to May 2, 2013.

Correspondence: Eric J. Dozois, M.D, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail:

© 2014 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons