Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2012 - Volume 55 - Issue 12 > The Ideal Ileal-Pouch Design: A Long-Term Randomized Contro...
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum:
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318270327f
Original Contribution: Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The Ideal Ileal-Pouch Design: A Long-Term Randomized Control Trial of J- vs W-Pouch Construction

McCormick, P. H. M.D., F.R.C.S.I.1; Guest, G. D. M.D., F.R.A.C.S.1; Clark, A. J. M.D., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.)1; Petersen, D. M.D., F.R.A.C.S.1; Clark, D. A. M.D., F.R.A.C.S.1,3; Stevenson, A. R. M.D., F.R.A.C.S.1,3; Lumley, J. W. M.D., F.R.A.C.S.2; Stitz, R. W. M.D., F.R.A.C.S.2

Collapse Box


BACKGROUND: The IPAA has become established as the preferred technique for restoring intestinal continuity postproctocolectomy. The ideal pouch design has not been established. W-pouches may give better functional results owing to increased volume, whereas the J-pouch’s advantage is its straightforward construction. We report short- and long-term results of an randomized control trial designed to establish the ideal pouch.

DESIGN: Ninety-four patients were randomly assigned to J- and W-pouches (49:45) and assessed at 1 and 8.7 years postoperatively. Assessment was questionnaire based and designed to assess pouch function and patient quality of life.

RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of patients were followed up at 1 year, and 68% were followed up at 8.7 years. At 1 year, there was a significant difference in 24-hour bowel movement frequency J- vs W-pouches 7 vs 5(p < 0.001) and in daytime frequency J- vs W-pouches 6 vs 4 (p < 0.001), with no difference in nocturnal function. At 9-year follow-up, function had equilibrated between the 2 groups: 24-hour bowel movement frequency J- vs W-pouches 6.5 vs 6 (p = 0.36), daytime frequency 5.5 vs 5 (p = 0.233), and nocturnal function 1 vs 1 (p = 0.987). Mean operating time of J- and W-pouches was 195 and 215 minutes (p < 0.05). All other parameters, pad usage, urgency, incontinence, and quality of life, did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the theoretical functional advantage conferred on the W-pouch by its greater volume exists only in the short term and is of little consequence to patients’ long-term quality of life. This advantage is attenuated as the pouches mature, resulting in no disparity in pouch function. This, combined with the more consistent, efficient, and easily taught construction of the J-pouch, should conclusively establish it as the optimum ileal-pouch design.

© The ASCRS 2012


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.