Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2011 - Volume 54 - Issue 7 > Bowel Preparation for Colectomy and Risk of Clostridium diff...
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum:
doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182125b55
Original Contribution

Bowel Preparation for Colectomy and Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection

Krapohl, Greta L. R.N., M.S.N.1; Phillips, Laurel R. S. R.N., M.S.N.2; Campbell, Darrell A. Jr. M.D.2,3; Hendren, Samantha M.D., M.P.H.3,4; Banerjee, Mousumi Ph.D.4,5; Metzger, Bonnie Ph.D., R.N.1; Morris, Arden M. M.D., M.P.H.3,4



In the article appearing on page 810 of the July 2011 issue of Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, there is an error in the Materials and Methods section under the heading “Patients and Data Collection.” The CTP codes in the following sentence were incorrect as published. The correct sentence reads:

The Colectomy Project, a special 24-hospital subset of the larger MSQC initiative, was started in 2007 to better understand best practices in various areas of colon surgery as identified by 4 Current Procedural Terminology codes (open segmental colectomy (44140), laparoscopic segmental colectomy (44204), ileocolic resection (44160), and laparoscopic ileocolic resection (44205)).

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 54(11):1461, November 2011.

Collapse Box


BACKGROUND: Mechanical bowel preparation before colectomy is controversial for several reasons, including a theoretically increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of C difficile infection among patients who underwent mechanical bowel preparation and those who did not. A secondary objective was to assess the association between C difficile infection and the use of oral antibiotics.

DESIGN: This was an observational cohort study.

SETTING: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Colectomy Project (n = 24 hospitals) participates in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program with additional targeted data specific to patients undergoing colectomies.

PATIENTS: Included were adult patients (21 years and older) admitted to participating hospitals for elective colectomy between August 2007 and June 2009.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was laboratory detection of a positive C difficile toxin assay or stool culture.

RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred sixty-three patients underwent colectomy and fulfilled inclusion criteria. Fifty-four patients developed a C difficile infection, for a hospital median rate of 2.8% (range, 0–14.7%). Use of mechanical bowel preparation was not associated with an increased incidence of C difficile infection (P = .95). Among 1685 patients that received mechanical bowel preparation, 684 (41%) received oral antibiotics. The proportion of patients in whom C difficile infection was diagnosed after the use of preoperative oral antibiotics was smaller than the proportion of patients with C difficile infection who did not receive oral antibiotics (1.6% vs 2.9%, P = .09).

LIMITATIONS: The potential exists for underestimation of C difficile infection because of the study's strict data collection criteria and risk of undetected infection after postoperative day 30.

CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous single-center data, this multicenter study showed that the preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation was not associated with increased risk of C difficile infection after colectomy. Moreover, the addition of oral antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation did not confer any additional risk of infection.

© The ASCRS 2011


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.