Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2008 - Volume 51 - Issue 7 > Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery is more Effective than Tra...
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum:
doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9337-x
Original Contribution: PDF Only

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery is more Effective than Traditional Transanal Excision for Resection of Rectal Masses.

Moore, Jesse S. M.D.; Cataldo, Peter A. M.D.; Osler, Turner M.D.; Hyman, Neil H. M.D.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, developed by Buess in the 1980s, has become increasingly popular in recent years. No large studies have compared the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery with traditional transanal excision.

Methods: Between 1990 and 2005, 171 patients underwent traditional transanal excision (n = 89) or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (n = 82) for rectal neoplasms. Medical records were reviewed to determine type of surgery, resection margins, specimen fragmentation, complications, recurrence, lesion type, stage, and size.

Results: The groups were similar with respect to age, sex, lesion type, stage, and size. Mean follow-up was 37 months. There was no difference in the complication rate between the groups (transanal endoscopic microsurgery 15 percent vs. traditional transanal excision 17 percent, P = 0.69). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was more likely to yield clear margins (90 vs. 71 percent, P = 0.001) and a nonfragmented specimen (94 vs. 65 percent, P < 0.001) compared with transanal excision. Recurrence was less frequent after transanal endoscopic microsurgery than after traditional transanal excision (5 vs. 27 percent, P = 0.004).

Conclusions: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is the technique of choice for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

(C) The ASCRS 2008

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.