Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2008 - Volume 19 - Issue 6 > Experience with Endeavor stent implantations
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Coronary Artery Disease:
September 2008 - Volume 19 - Issue 6 - pp 421-423
doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328304a243
Therapy and Prevention

Experience with Endeavor stent implantations

Lupkovics, Géza; Kenéz, András; Németh, Zoltán; Motyovszki, Ákos; Takács, István; Papp, Elõd

Collapse Box

Abstract

Restenosis is the most common disadvantage of percutaneous coronary interventions. The incidence of restenosis can be lowered with the use of stents. After the use of stents, 'in-stent' restenosis can occur. To avoid it drug-eluting stents were developed, but the occurrence of stent thrombosis is higher than observed in case of bare-metal stents. Endeavor is a new zotarolimus-eluting stent developed to reduce the stent thrombosis.

Aims: In a prospective study we aimed to follow-up our patients regarding the incidence of in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis, and clinical end points after Endeavor stent implantation.

Patients and methods: Endeavor stents have been implanted in patients undergoing coronary angiography with the following indications: complex lesions susceptible to restenosis and after recanalization of chronic total occlusions.

Results: Endeavor stent implantations were successfully performed in 99 patients and has been successful in 98% of cases, two stents could not be implanted because of technical difficulties. Significant restenosis was observed in eight patients (8.1%). Subacute stent thrombosis (within 10 days) occurred in two patients (2.0%). Any late stent thrombosis was not observed.

Conclusion: Our registry affirmed the results of the Endeavor I trial in a population with more severe and longer coronary stenosis. We can conclude that the Endeavor stent is suitable for implantation in complex, longer coronary lesions. Our long-term follow-up data do not prove those opinions which prefer bare-metal stent implantation in all patients because of the late adverse events of the drug-eluting stents.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.