The aim of this study was to compare the antiangiogenic effects of subconjunctival application of bevacizumab and tocilizumab on the regression of corneal neovascularization (NV) in rabbits.
Corneal neovascularization was induced in 48 eyes of 24 rabbits. Seven days after suture placement, the rabbits were divided into 4 groups of 6 rabbits each and treated subconjunctivally with 0.1 mL balanced salt solution (group 1), 0.1 mL tocilizumab (0.25 mg per 0.1 mL and 2.5 mg per 0.1 mL, groups 2 and 3), or 0.1 mL bevacizumab (2.5 mg per 0.1 mL) (group 4). Digital photographs of the eyes were obtained and the surface areas of corneal neovascularization were measured on days 7 and 14 after subconjunctival injections. On days 7 and 14, 3 rabbits were randomly chosen and the eyes were extracted. Half of the corneal specimens were analyzed histopathologically, and the other half were used to measure the concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and IL-6 using a multiplex bead assay, and the levels were compared with those of the controls.
The surface areas of induced corneal neovascularization were significantly smaller in groups 3 and 4 (2.5 mg of tocilizumab and 2.5 mg of bevacizumab) compared with the control group on days 7 and 14 (P < 0.05). Group 2 did not show significant difference from the control group on days 7 and 14. There were no differences observed in the reduced neovascularization areas in groups 3 and 4 on days 7 and 14. The concentrations of VEGF in groups 3 and 4 were significantly lower than in the control group, and IL-6 mRNA levels were significantly lower in group 3 than in the other groups (P < 0.001) on days 7 and 14. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the reduced expression of VEGF in all 3 experimental groups compared with the control group.
An antiangiogenic effect was observed after subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg tocilizumab to an extent similar to that seen with 2.5 mg bevacizumab, which indicates that subconjunctival application of tocilizumab is effective for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization.
*Department of Ophthalmology, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; and
†Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, St. Paul's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Reprints: Sung Kun Chung, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, St. Paul's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, Republic of Korea (e-mail: email@example.com).
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received March 31, 2014
Received in revised form June 18, 2014
Accepted June 24, 2014