Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2014 - Volume 33 - Issue 1 > DMEK Complications
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000023
Case Report

DMEK Complications

Gorovoy, Mark S. MD

Collapse Box


Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and management of the complications of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery performed by a single surgeon.

Methods: This is a retrospective case series. The clinical records of 72 consecutive patients (75 eyes) who underwent a DMEK with a minimum of 1-month postoperative follow-up were reviewed for adverse outcomes. The surgeon's first 50 operated eyes over a 4-month period were excluded from this study.

Results: All the eyes included were pseudophakic with endothelial failure resulting from either Fuchs dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, or a failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. All the eyes had a total resolution of corneal edema. Donor tissue peeling was unsuccessful in 2 of 75 cases. Primary failure occurred in 2 of 75 cases; a repeated DMEK provided successful visual rehabilitation in both cases. Rebubbling was performed in 2 of 75 eyes, which was unsuccessful in both cases. Peripheral donor scrolls/contractions occurred in 17 of 75 eyes, and all were asymptomatic with 14 of 17 eyes (82%) located in the inferior quadrants. There were no cases of pupillary block glaucoma, inverted donors, or free-floating donors. Preliminary best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 at postoperative month 3 with corresponding excellent endothelial counts (mean of 2112 cells per square millimeter in 22 patients with 6 months of follow-up).

Conclusions: The safety and rate of operative complications of DMEK are approaching that of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.