Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of real-time measurement of corneal epithelial thickness and investigate the distribution characteristics in a large normal-eye population using a clinically available spectral-domain anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS OCT) system.
Methods: Corneal epithelial thickness distribution and topographic thickness variability were clinically investigated using AS OCT imaging in 373 patients with normal, healthy eyes. Descriptive statistics investigated 3 sets of subgroups, male (n = 171) and female (n = 202), younger (n = 194) and older (n = 179), right eyes (n = 195) and left eyes (n = 197).
Results: Pupil center epithelial thickness repeatability was an average 0.88 ± 0.71 μm; a similar repeatability was noted for the superior, inferior, maximum, and minimum epithelial thickness. On average, the pupil center epithelial thickness was 53.28 ± 3.34 μm, superior 51.86 ± 3.78 μm, inferior 53.81 ± 3.44 μm, minimum 48.65 ± 4.54 μm, maximum 56.35 ± 3.80 μm, and topographic variability was 1.78 ± 0.78 μm. Small differences were noted between male (average center 54.10 ± 3.34 μm) and female (52.58 ± 3.19 μm) subjects. The topographic thickness variability seems to increase with age: younger group, 1.65 ± 0.83 μm; older group, 1.93 ± 0.90 μm (P = 0.173).
Conclusions: We present a comprehensive investigation of corneal epithelial thickness distribution characteristics in a healthy, untreated human eye population by using in vivo, clinically available Fourier-domain AS OCT. The 3-dimensional epithelial maps reveal epithelial nonuniformity and provide a novel benchmark for future and comparative studies.
*Laservision.gr Eye Institute, Athens, Greece; and
†NYU Medical School, New York, NY.
Reprints: Anastasios John Kanellopoulos, Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology, NYU Medical School, New York, NY, Laservision.gr Eye Institute, 17 Tsocha St, Athens 11521, Greece (e-mail: email@example.com).
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.corneajrnl.com).
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received April 17, 2013
Accepted June 19, 2013