Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2013 - Volume 32 - Issue 10 > Assessing the Reproducibility of Quantitative In Vivo Confoc...
Cornea:
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31829dd7f8
Clinical Science

Assessing the Reproducibility of Quantitative In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Different Corneal Locations

Kim, Gene MD*,†,‡; Singleton, J. Robinson MD§; Mifflin, Mark D. MD*; Digre, Kathleen B. MD*; Porzio, Michael T. BS§; Smith, A. Gordon MD§

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the reproducibility of in vivo confocal microscopy for quantitative corneal nerve analysis in different corneal locations.

Methods:

Corneal confocal microscopy was performed on 10 healthy participants, and the corneal nerve fiber length, corneal nerve fiber density, corneal nerve branch density, and tortuosity coefficient were measured at 5 predetermined locations for only the right eye. Bland–Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation of all 4 corneal nerve measurements were compared between 2 visits and between readers to assess reproducibility. Two technicians performed a masked analysis of images from both visits.

Results:

Ten participants with a mean age of 31.3 ± 2.8 years were imaged at 2 different time points separated by a mean of 4.3 ± 4.3 weeks. The interobserver agreements were better than the intervisit agreements for all the 4 corneal nerve measurements as evaluated using Bland–Altman plots. The intervisit ICC ranged from 0.13 to 0.45, and the interobserver ICC ranged from 0.55 to 0.94. The differences between observers and the differences between sessions were not statistically different among all the 5 locations (P > 0.1) for each corneal nerve measurement.

Conclusions:

Single confocal images have poor reliability for any of the 4 corneal nerve measurements, and there is no single location on the cornea that has improved reproducibility. Averaging 5 images, from different locations, improves the reproducibility and is essential for obtaining clinically meaningful data.

Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.