You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Comparison of Manual and Automated Endothelial Cell Density Analysis in Normal Eyes and DSEK Eyes

Price, Marianne O. PhD*; Fairchild, Kelly M. BA*; Price, Francis W. Jr MD

Cornea:
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825de8fa
Clinical Science
Abstract

Purpose: To compare automated endothelial cell density analysis with manual cell detection methods with 3 imaging devices.

Methods: In this prospective study, the corneal endothelium of 54 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) eyes and 28 normal eyes was analyzed with a Nidek Confoscan 4 confocal microscope using a 20× noncontact lens and with Tomey EM-3000 and Konan Noncon Robo SP-8800 specular microscopes. Testing order was randomized. The Confoscan and Robo images were presented in a blinded fashion to an experienced technician for manual cell identification and analysis using the manufacturer's software. A different operator determined endothelial cell density using fully automated software associated with each imaging device. Agreement between methods was assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey analysis.

Results: Manual cell identification on Robo and Confoscan 4 images produced comparable cell density measurements in normal eyes (P = 0.73) and DSEK eyes (P = 0.11). The Confoscan automated cell detection software differed significantly from manual cell detection in both normal and DSEK eyes (P = 0.0003 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The Robo automated cell detection software produced results comparable with manual cell detection in normal eyes (P = 0.082) but significantly overestimated cell density in DSEK eyes (P < 0.0001). The EM-3000 automated cell detection produced results comparable with manual cell detection in normal eyes (P = 0.067) and DSEK eyes (P = 0.49).

Conclusions: Only 1 of 3 automated cell detection programs produced cell density readings comparable with those obtained with manual cell identification; the other 2 automated programs significantly overstated endothelial cell density in DSEK eyes.

Author Information

*Cornea Research Foundation of America, Indianapolis, IN

Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, IN.

Reprints: Marianne O. Price, Cornea Research Foundation of America, 9002 North Meridian St, Suite 212, Indianapolis, IN 46260 (e-mail: marianneprice@cornea.org).

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Received February 17, 2012

Accepted May 4, 2012

© 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.