You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial DystrophyInfluence of Graft Diameter on Endothelial Cell Loss

Anshu, Arundhati MD*,†; Price, Marianne O. PhD*; Price, Francis W. Jr MD

doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318247311a
Clinical Science

Purpose: To evaluate the potential influence of graft diameter on endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Methods: A retrospective interventional case series of eyes treated with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (n = 695) with at least 1-year follow-up at Price Vision Group (Indianapolis, IN) was analyzed, excluding eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. Graft diameters ranged from 7.5 to 9.5 mm, with 8.5- and 9-mm grafts accounting for the majority. Endothelial cell loss was assessed as a function of graft diameter by analysis of variance.

Results: Mean baseline donor endothelial cell density was 3039 cells per mm2 for 8.5-mm grafts (n = 225) and 3026 cells per mm2 for 9-mm grafts (n = 409). Mean endothelial cell density and postoperative endothelial cell loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 2070 (32%), 1999 (34%), 1920 (37%), 1865 (39%), and 1617 (47%) cells per mm2 for 8.5-mm grafts versus 2098 (30%), 2019 (33%), 1857 (38%), 1854 (38%), and 1619 (46%) cells per mm2 for 9.0-mm grafts, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant at any time point. The rates of graft dislocation and immunologic rejection episode were comparable for 8.5-mm and 9.0-mm grafts (both P > 0.05).

Conclusions: A larger graft diameter (9 mm) theoretically provides a larger reservoir of healthy endothelial cells but did not result in significantly less cell loss than a smaller diameter (8.5 mm) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy during the 5-year follow-up.

Author Information

*Cornea Research Foundation of America

Price Vision Group.

Reprints: Marianne O. Price, Cornea Research Foundation of America, 9002 North Meridian St, Suite 212, Indianapolis, IN 46260 (e-mail:

The authors have no financial or commercial interest to disclose.

Received July 27, 2011

Accepted December 15, 2011

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.