Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2011 - Volume 30 - Issue 12 > Risk Factors for Graft Failure After Penetrating Keratoplast...
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318206895a
Clinical Science

Risk Factors for Graft Failure After Penetrating Keratoplasty: 5-Year Follow-Up From the Corneal Transplant Epidemiological Study

Fasolo, Adriano MSc*; Capuzzo, Cristina MSc†; Fornea, Michela†; Franch, Antonella MD‡; Birattari, Federica MD‡; Carito, Giuseppe MD§; Cucco, Flavio MD§; Prosdocimo, Giovanni MD¶; Sala, Michele MD¶; Noci, Nicola Delle MD‖; Primavera, Vito MD‖; Frigo, Anna Chiara MSc†; Grigoletto, Francesco MSc†; Ponzin, Diego MD*; the CORTES Study Group

Collapse Box


Purpose: To evaluate corneal graft survival over a 5-year period and to investigate whether factors related to the donor, eye bank practices, the recipient, surgery, and postoperative course influenced the outcome.

Methods: Nine hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly selected and monitored in the subsequent 3 years from a cohort of 4500 recipients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty between 2001 and 2004. Cox univariate regression analysis was used to select variables to be included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with a backward selection procedure to identify potential risk factors for graft failure. Graft survival curves were obtained from Kaplan–Meier estimates.

Results: Ectasia/thinning was the most common indication (49.1%), followed by regraft (16.1%) and pseudophakic corneal edema (PCE) (9.4%). The overall rate of graft failure was 10.7% with 6 cases of primary graft failure. Adverse reactions and complications (other than graft failure) were reported in 2.7% of patients in the first postoperative week and in 22.8% during the full follow-up period. The probability of 5-year survival was 83.0%, best in eyes with ectasia/thinning (96.0%) and less favorable in PCE (67.0%) and regraft (64.0%). Multivariate analyses showed the following variables to be linked to an increased risk of graft failure: regraft for any reason, all clinical indication except PCE, history of ocular inflammation/infection, pseudophakic/aphakic eye, vitrectomy, graft Descemet folds, adverse reactions/complications, and surgeons' low caseload.

Conclusions: Penetrating keratoplasty shows an overall positive prognosis in the long-term. However, the probability of graft survival is largely dependent on the preoperative clinical condition and the lack of complications during follow-up.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.