Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2008 - Volume 18 - Issue 6 > Current status of tissue engineering in urology
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Current Opinion in Urology:
November 2008 - Volume 18 - Issue 6 - p 564-569
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32830f9402
Reconstructive surgery: Edited by Christopher Woodhouse

Current status of tissue engineering in urology

Wood, Dan; Southgate, Jennifer

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose of review: Tissue engineering is a rapidly advancing technology that is shifting from the laboratory to urological practice. The review explores recent developments and considers the relationship to existing treatments.

Recent findings: Different strategies to generate transplantable tissue grafts in vitro and harness host regenerative processes for integration of grafts and biomaterials in vivo are common themes in the recent literature. Highlights include dynamic cell culture to precondition grafts and the use of omental wrapping to promote vascularization. Emphasis on specific cell culture conditions is set to shift towards the monitoring of differentiation and functional outcome. The future might encompass the use of stem cells to overcome the issues of harvesting cells from diseased tissues. Improved understandings of scaffold and cell interactions are particularly important to advance graft development and outcome. Recent trials give some indication of clinical outcome for tissue-engineered treatments, but patient benefit could be difficult to interpret in salvage cases.

Summary: Tissue engineering applications can be broken down into tissue- or organ-based approaches, only through examining these in clinical settings can potential success can be judged. Treatments must be appropriately evaluated for risk/benefit in comparison to existing treatments. This approach requires open and robust debate amongst clinicians and scientists.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.