Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2010 - Volume 20 - Issue 6 > The importance of patient-reported outcome measures in recon...
Current Opinion in Urology:
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833cf4a5
Reconstructive surgery: Edited by Christopher R. Chapple

The importance of patient-reported outcome measures in reconstructive urology

Jackson, Matthew Ja; N'Dow, Jamesb; Pickard, Robc

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose of review: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now recognised as the most appropriate instruments to assess the effectiveness of healthcare interventions from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this review was to identify recent publications describing the use of PROMs following reconstructive urological surgery.

Recent findings: A wide systematic search identified only three original articles published in the last 2 years that prospectively assessed effectiveness using a patient-completed condition-specific or generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument. These publications illustrate the need to administer PROMs at a postoperative interval relevant to the anticipated recovery phase of individual procedures. They also highlight the difference in responsiveness of generic HRQoL instruments to symptomatic improvement between straightforward conditions such as pelviureteric junction obstruction and complex multidimensional conditions such as meningomyelocele.

Summary: PROMs uptake and awareness is increasing in reconstructive urology but more work is required to demonstrate the effectiveness of surgical procedures for patients and healthcare funders alike. Healthcare policy-makers now rely on these measures to determine whether specific treatments are worth financing and to compare outcomes between institutions.

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.