Can anxiety damage the brain?

Mah, Lindaa,b; Szabuniewicz, Claudiab; Fiocco, Alexandra J.c

Current Opinion in Psychiatry: January 2016 - Volume 29 - Issue 1 - p 56–63
doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000223
MOOD AND ANXIETY DISORDERS: Edited by Sidney H. Kennedy and Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

Purpose of review: Stress exacerbates mental illnesses such as depression but also appears to increase risk of dementia, suggesting a common mechanism for development of stress-induced affective and cognitive impairment. The purpose of this review is to address the question of whether anxiety ‘damages’ the brain, and to identify potential mechanisms for the link between stress and neuropsychiatric illness.

Recent findings: Anxiety disorders are associated with alterations in fear neurocircuitry such that ‘bottom-up’ processes in the amygdala which respond to threat are exaggerated, and regulation of these processes by the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus is impaired. Chronic stress exposure similarly alters fear neurocircuitry by enhancing amygdalar functioning while causing structural degeneration in the PFC and hippocampus thereby inhibiting PFC/hippocampus control over the stress response. Pharmacological (e.g., antidepressant medications) and nonpharmacological interventions (cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise) may reverse stress-induced damage in the brain.

Summary: Pathological anxiety and chronic stress lead to structural degeneration and impaired functioning of the hippocampus and the PFC, which may account for the increased risk of developing neuropsychiatric disorders, including depression and dementia. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether reversal of stress-induced brain changes by interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy can reduce risk of neuropsychiatric illness.

aDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Toronto

bRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care

cDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Stress and Wellbeing Research, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to Linda Mah, MD, MHS, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, 3560 Bathurst Street, BHC 738, Toronto, ON, M6A 2E1, Canada. Tel: +1 416 785 2500 x3365; e-mail: lmah@research.baycrest.org

Article Outline
Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Anxiety is a feeling of unease, nervousness, or worry about an event with an uncertain outcome [1]. These subjective symptoms are often accompanied by physiological signs of arousal, such as sweating, trembling, dizziness, or a rapid heartbeat. Anxiety is a normal part of life when it is occasional and temporary, but can become pathological or a disorder when it is frequent or chronic and begins to interfere with daily activities such as work, school, and relationships. The terms anxiety, fear, and stress are often used interchangeably, with the main differences arising in the ‘nature of the event’ that elicits the emotional response and arguably, the extent to which the response is appropriate or ‘normal’. Because anxiety is a feeling associated with an imminent event or a hypothetical situation that may or may not happen [2], it is often conceptualized as being a negative or maladaptive state. In contrast, fear is typically defined as an emotional reaction when confronted with immediate or perceived threat, and is considered to be vital to survival. But fear can also be pathological, as in the phobic disorders. Stress is typically conceptualized as an adaptive response to a specific challenge or demand, and its definitions emphasize physiological, in addition to emotional changes. Chronic stress, however, is a pathological state that is caused by prolonged activation of the normal acute physiological stress response, which can wreak havoc on immune, metabolic, and cardiovascular systems. Thus anxiety, fear, and stress are not distinct but rather are inter-related, by virtue of common neuroendocrine and arousal mechanisms and an extensively overlapping neurocircuitry [3▪]. When functioning optimally, these systems serve to direct attentional resources toward salient information in the environment and mobilize appropriate behaviors in response. Thus, this review addresses the question of whether anxiety ‘damages’ the brain and identifies potential mechanisms for this putative causal relationship by integrating findings from animal models of stress and fear conditioning and from neuroimaging studies of stress and anxiety in healthy individuals and in clinical populations. We begin by reviewing the neurocircuitry of fear and anxiety and provide an overview of how this neurocircuitry is altered in clinical anxiety disorders. We then review the neurocircuitry of the stress response, discuss the impact of chronic stress on the brain, and conclude by reviewing some recent findings on the effect of antianxiety interventions on the brain.

Back to Top | Article Outline

NEUROCIRCUITRY OF FEAR AND ANXIETY

Detection of threat or other salient information in the environment and generation of autonomic arousal and emotions such as fear and anxiety in response to threat are mediated by a ‘bottom-up’ or ventral neural system. This system includes the amygdala, insula, ventral striatum, hypothalamus, periadequeductal grey, and ventral regions of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), specifically ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex [4]. The amygdala plays a central role in this circuit. The amygdala selectively attends to threat and is essential for expression of fear. It also plays an essential role in fear conditioning by learning cues that predict adverse events [5]. This ventral network has been delineated based on animal models of fear conditioning and extinction [5,6], lesion studies [7,8,9▪▪], and human neuroimaging studies of fear and anxiety (Fig. 1) [10,11].

‘Top-down’ cognitive processes, or a dorsal neural system, regulate these emotional responses through cognitive appraisal of the potential threat and inhibition of autonomic and emotional processes when they are no longer appropriate for the situation [12,13]. Both the PFC and the hippocampus play important roles in downregulation of bottom-up processing of threat. Regulation of emotional responses such as fear and anxiety may be achieved through voluntary or involuntary subprocesses. Voluntary or conscious subprocesses include suppression of emotion, distraction from the threatening stimulus, and reappraisal of the threat or emotion stimuli. These voluntary processes are supported by dorsal and lateral regions of the PFC and ACC [dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC), ventrolateral PFC (vlPFC), dorsal ACC, dorsomedial PFC (dmPFC)] [14–16]. Involuntary, automatic, or ‘unconscious’ processes include extinction of previously conditioned fear responses, inhibition of autonomic responses and physiological arousal, automatic redirection of attention, and automatic cognitive appraisal and reappraisal. The processes of extinction and inhibition of autonomic responses are mediated primarily through interactions between the amygdala and vmPFC [17,18]. Functional neuroimaging studies in healthy individuals also demonstrate that the ability to decrease negative affect is subserved by amygdala-vmPFC coupling [19]. In contrast, automatic redirection of attention away from threat appears to depend on activation of the rostral ACC [20].

Although the hippocampus plays an important role in memory formation, it also serves to regulate emotions through contextual extinction during fear conditioning. In contrast to the amygdala which processes cues predicting a threatening or aversive stimulus during fear conditioning, the dorsal hippocampus relays contextual information about the specific threat cue through interactions with the amygdala and the vmPFC [21,22]. The dorsal hippocampus encodes contextual information or cues relevant to the threat which is then retrieved when subsequently presented with the stimulus [23]. This allows the organism to discriminate threat from safety cues and appraise the relative threat level of the stimulus [24▪]. In animal models of fear conditioning, for example, when rats are presented with a tone predicting a shock, they learn to fear the tone cue as well as the place (context) where the tone-shock pairings occurred. This ability to discriminate between features that signal threat versus those that indicate safety may contribute to automatic cognitive appraisal and reappraisal as a means to regulate emotions. In humans, there appear to be dissociable contextual effects of the hippocampus on medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) pathways with the dmPFC mediating the effect of hippocampus on amygdala activity during fear renewal (reinstatement of conditioned fear following extinction) and the vmPFC partially mediating the effect of hippocampus on the amygdala during extinction recall [25▪▪].

In summary, a simplification of fear and anxiety neurocircuitry is that the amygdala (bottom-up/ventral neural system) functions to detect threat and generate emotions such as fear and anxiety, whereas the mPFC and hippocampus (top-down/dorsal ventral system) function to downregulate the amygdala. Emotion regulation is achieved when activity of the amygdala is balanced with the activity of the mPFC and hippocampus.

Back to Top | Article Outline

FUNCTIONAL NEUROANATOMY OF ANXIETY DISORDERS

The hallmark of anxiety disorders is impaired ability to regulate emotional responses to perceived threat. This may occur because of a reduction in threshold for activation of the amygdala and other limbic/subcortical regions in the ventral neural system, exaggerated activity within these regions, or failure of top-down processes to downregulate the ventral neural system. In other words, the ventral neural system (amygdala) responding to threat is hyperactive, whereas the dorsal neural system (PFC and hippocampus) is hypoactive. A wealth of evidence indicates that anxiety disorders are associated with increased sensitivity to threat or negative information in the external environment, such that attention is selective for threat, and exposure to threat is associated with enhanced amygdala activity. This has been demonstrated in panic disorder [26,27], social anxiety disorder (SAD) [28,29], simple phobias [30–32], generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) [33–35], and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [36–38]. There is also evidence of impaired extinction learning [39], reduction of mPFC activity [28,29,34,40–42], and decoupling of the amgydala and mPFC in these disorders [43,44▪,45▪], suggesting decreased PFC control over the amygdala and other region in the ventral neural system. Anxiety disorders are also associated with the tendency to overgeneralize or generalize fear across stimuli, events or contexts because of impaired ability to discriminate between threats versus safety cues, that is, impaired discriminative conditioning. Deficits in discriminative conditioning have been demonstrated in GAD [46▪], panic disorder [47], PTSD [39,48▪] and social phobia [49]. In PTSD, impaired discriminative conditioning is associated with reduced hippocampus volume [50,51]. Reduced contextual control of extinction by the hippocampus, leading to reinstatement of conditioned fear that was previously extinguished, or ‘fear renewal’ is suggested as a mechanism for development of anxiety disorders [52].

Back to Top | Article Outline

NEUROCIRCUITRY OF STRESS RESPONSE

Exposure to acute stress results in catecholamine release peripherally through the sympathetic-adreno-medullary system and an increase in the stress hormone cortisol through the central hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system [53]. The hypothalamus stimulates the adrenal medulla to release the catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine into the blood stream, which leads to autonomic changes, such as increased heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and skin conductance. These changes constitute a ‘fight-or-flight response’ that facilitates and directs attention and arousal to the immediate threat while inhibiting functions that are nonadaptive in the current situation, such as digestion and sexual behavior. Closely following sympathetic-adreno-medullary activation is activation of the HPA axis, which begins with the secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone from the hypothalamus. Corticotropin-releasing hormone activates release of adrenocorticotropin hormone from the pituitary into the blood portal, which then stimulates the adrenal cortex to secrete glucocorticoids, or cortisol in humans. Circulating glucocorticoids facilitates a cascade of physiological changes, including increased metabolism, cardiovascular output, and glucogenesis, all of which facilitate the fight-or-flight response. Glucocorticoids further play a key role in regulating the stress response by providing inhibitory feedback at various levels of the HPA axis, which terminates the stress response once the stressor has subsided. All aforementioned events are orchestrated to allow the individual to adapt to the demands of their changing environment, enabling a homeostatic balance of physiological parameters within a dynamic environment, a process that has been termed allostasis [54].

Acute stress also increases release of the catecholamine dopamine in the PFC, a process that is controlled by the amygdala [55–57]. Dopamine release occurs even with mild levels of stress in the primate dlPFC [58]. Acute stress also increases norepinephrine levels in the PFC [59], through amygdalar activation of corticotrophin-release factor receptors which, in turn, activate noradrenergic neurons on the locus coeruleus [60]. In experimental studies with animals using dopamine or NE agonists to elicit, and antagonists to block stress-induced PFC function, increased catecholamine release in the PFC results in impaired function, particularly in the domain of working memory [61–64]. Catecholamine levels are further increased by glucocorticoid through blockage of transporters on glia which normally remove extracellular catecholamines [65] and through its actions on the hypothalamus and on suprahypothalamic regions that contain glucocorticoid receptors, including the PFC, amygdala, and hippocampus [66]. Glucocorticoid-sensitive hippocampal neurons provide negative feedback to the HPA axis to terminate the stress response when it is no longer adaptive [67]. Regulation of HPA activity is also achieved through the mPFC which plays a top-down role by modulating hippocampal and amygdala activity via glucocorticoid negative feedback mechanisms [68].

Thus, the hippocampus and mPFC regions of the dorsal neural system in fear neurocircuitry serve to regulate emotions through functional connectivity with the amygdala, and these regions additionally regulate the stress response through glucocorticoid-mediated feedback mechanisms.

Back to Top | Article Outline

IMPACT OF PATHOLOGICAL ANXIETY AND CHRONIC STRESS EXPOSURE ON THE BRAIN

Although adaptive in the short run, frequent, or chronic activation of stress-sensitive systems can lead to an eventual ‘wear and tear’ of the neuroendocrine system, which over time infringes upon the function of other interconnected physiological systems, including immune, metabolic, and cardiovascular systems. This breakdown in the physiological milieu of the organism is referred to as allostatic load and is associated with increased risk of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and neuropsychiatric disorders [69–71]. It has long been appreciated that the experience of stress exacerbates mental illness, contributing to risk of depression [72], and triggering the onset of disorders such as schizophrenia [73] or bipolar disorder [74] and development of PTSD [75]. It was recently reported that women who experienced significant psychosocial stress in middle age were at increased risk for developing Alzheimer's disease 20 years later [76,77]. Anxiety symptoms also increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease in cognitively normal elderly and in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a prodrome of Alzheimer's disease, by as much as 2.5-fold [78–81] (but see [82–88]). Further, anxiety in MCI is associated with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers including abnormal concentrations of Aβ42 and t-tau in cerebrospinal fluid [89]. Stress-level glucocorticoid administration in animal models of Alzheimer's disease results in increased amyloid formation and tau accumulation [90]. Although previous studies which included depression as a covariate have found an inverse or no association between anxiety and Alzheimer's disease [82–84,88], we recently reported using data from the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative, that anxiety severity in aMCI, as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, increased the rate of conversion to Alzheimer's disease, even after controlling for depression and cognitive decline [91▪]. The hazards ratio for anxiety was 1.33, indicating that risk of Alzheimer's disease increased by 33, 78, and 135% for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. Anxiety severity in aMCI was also associated with increased rate of atrophy within the entorhinal cortex of the medial temporal lobe, an early neuroimaging biomarker of Alzheimer's disease. To identify potential mechanisms to account for the associations between stress and development of affective and cognitive disorders, we turn to the evidence on the impact of chronic stress on the brain structure and function.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HIPPOCAMPAL DAMAGE

Enhanced receptor binding following chronic HPA activation and subsequent increases in glucocorticoid secretion has been found to inflict detrimental effects on the hippocampus in both animals and humans [92–94]. Chronic stress and excessive glucocorticoid exposure may compromise the integrity of the hippocampus. This is evidenced by hippocampal atrophy, and decreased hippocampus neurogenesis [95]. Damage or atrophy of the hippocampus is associated with a feed-forward impairment on the organism's ability to inhibit the HPA axis once the stressor has subsided, leading to prolonged HPA activation and further neuronal damage [96]. Notably, chronic stress is found to cause decreases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a brain chemical necessary for neurogenesis, which in turn disrupts serotonin activity [97].

It has been suggested that deficits in hippocampus neurogenesis lead to affective and anxiety disorders [98,99] and reinstatement of hippocampus neurogenesis may be one mechanism of antidepressant action [100–102]. Decreased neurogenesis in the hippocampus of rodents results in cognitive deterioration, depressive-like symptoms, and anxiety-like behaviors [103–105]. A similar phenomenon is observed in human studies, which have reported hippocampal atrophy and HPA dysregulation in psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder [106]. Chronic fluoxetine exposure led to increased expression of myelination-related genes in the hippocampus, which correlated negatively with anxiety-like behavior in rats exposed to fluoxetine as adults or neonates [107]. In transgenic mice, arrest of hippocampus neurogenesis impaired associative learning, whereas also sensitizing mice to the generalized fear and anxiety caused by fear conditioning. Thus, adult hippocampus neurogenesis may enhance the ability to learn predictive contingencies involving aversive events, whereas attenuating the anxiety experienced during fear conditioning [108▪]. This observation may account for the co-occurrence of cognitive deficits in mood and anxiety disorders or the depression and anxiety often observed in dementia and individuals at risk for dementia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PREFRONTAL CORTEX DAMAGE

Chronic stress exposure in the rodent also causes structural and functional degeneration of the PFC [109]. Specifically, loss of dendrites and spines in the pyramidal cells of the PFC occurs after sustained stress exposure in the rat [110–112] which correlated with impaired working memory [113]. Other animal work suggests that chronic stress exposure is circuit specific. In contrast to ‘loss’ of dendrites in the PFC, chronic stress ‘increases’ dendritic growth in the amygdala, which further accentuates the imbalance in amygdalar versus PFC function (i.e., enhanced bottom-up versus impaired top-down processes) [114]. Further, PFC neurons are differentially affected by chronic stress. Although PFC neurons that form cortico-cortical connections show dendritic loss, orbital PFC neurons and the subset of PFC neurons that activate the amygdala do not atrophy during chronic stress [110,112]. In humans, decreased PFC gray matter volume correlates with exposure to adverse events [115]. Chronic stress is also associated with reduced functional connectivity of the PFC [116] and weakened PFC regulation of the amygdala [117]. Depressed adults followed over 3 years who had remitted had less volume decline than nonremitted patients in the hippocampus, anterior cingulate, and the dorsomedial and dorsolateral regions of the PFC [118]. Although the literature suggests that stress-induced PFC degeneration may contribute to development of psychiatric disorders, including depression and PTSD, whether this mechanism also accounts for increase in dementia risk is unknown.

Back to Top | Article Outline

EFFECT OF ANTIANXIETY TREATMENT ON FEAR AND ANXIETY NEUROCIRCUITRY

It is important to note that stress-induced damage to the hippocampus and PFC is not completely irreversible. In animals, desipramine, a selective norepinephrine blocker, can restore the cognitive deficits induced by chronic unpredictable stress, possibly by activating alpha 1-adrenergic receptors in the mPFC [119]. The mood stabilizer lithium also increases hippocampal neurogenesis [120], particularly under stress conditions [121]. Chronic lithium treatment in bipolar patients increases HC volume [122] and may stabilize cognitive decline in aMCI [123]. Antidepressant treatment and physical activity have both been found to increase hippocampal neurogenesis [124,125]. Consolidation of amygdalar-PFC functional connectivity may be normalized following antidepressant treatment for depression [126]. Prazosin, an alpha-adrenergic antagonist, used to treat PTSD reduces flashbacks and improves concentration suggesting PFC function may be improved (reviewed in [127▪]). A course of treatment with the Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram for older adults with GAD lead to increased functional connectivity between dlPFC and vlPFC and parietal areas involved in attention [128]. Cognitive-behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders reduce amygdalar reactivity [129,130,131▪], increase activity in PFC regions supporting cognitive appraisal including dlPFC and dmPFC [130,132] and enhance inverse functional connectivity between the amygdala and dmPFC [132]. Mindfulness training in GAD alters amygdala-PFC connectivity [133] and even simple cognitive tutoring for math anxiety in children reduces amygdala reactivity in addition to decreasing anxiety [134▪].

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

Chronic stress increases risk of major psychiatric disorders such as depression, and more recently has been linked with onset of dementia. Potential mechanisms for these associations are suggested by the experimental observations that stress enhances amygdalar activity but leads to structural degeneration of the PFC and hippocampus, which in turn leads to deficits in emotion regulation and cognitive impairment. It is thus evident that pathological anxiety/stress can damage the brain – but this damage may be reversible using both pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Whether antianxiety interventions can reduce risk of developing neuropsychiatric illness needs to be established with longitudinal studies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Financial support and sponsorship

L.M. holds grants from the Alzheimer's Society of Canada and the Brain Canada MIRI grant. A.F. is supported by the Mind and Life Institute.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

▪ of special interest

▪▪ of outstanding interest

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Anxiety. Oxforddictionaries.com 2015. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/anxiety. [Accessed 2 October 2015].
2. Bremner JD, Charney DS. The anxiety disorders. Conn's current therapies. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994.
3▪. Perusini JN, Fanselow MS. Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxiety. Learn Mem 2015; 22:417–425.

The article provides an excellent overview of the distinction between fear and anxiety, viewed from a neurobehavioral approach.

4. Ongur D, Price JL. The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2000; 10:206–219.
5. Phelps EA, LeDoux JE. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron 2005; 48:175–187.
6. Quirk GJ, Repa C, LeDoux JE. Fear conditioning enhances short-latency auditory responses of lateral amygdala neurons: parallel recordings in the freely behaving rat. Neuron 1995; 15:1029–1039.
7. Anderson AK, Phelps EA. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature 2001; 411:305–309.
8. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, et al. Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans. Science (New York, NY) 1995; 269:1115–1118.
9▪▪. Motzkin JC, Philippi CL, Wolf RC, et al. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex is critical for the regulation of amygdala activity in humans. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 77:276–284.

The study is the first definitive test and evidence for the critical role of the vmPFC in regulating the activity of the amygdala in humans, offering novel support for the inhibitory influence of the vmPFC, and corroborating rodent lesion and electrophysiological studies modeling affective dysfunction in mental illnesses.

10. Whalen PJ, Rauch SL, Etcoff NL, et al. Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. J Neurosci 1998; 18:411–418.
11. Breiter HC, Etcoff NL, Whalen PJ, et al. Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression. Neuron 1996; 17:875–887.
12. Phillips ML, Ladouceur CD, Drevets WC. A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13:829.
13. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 2002; 39:281–291.
14. Beauregard M, Levesque J, Bourgouin P. Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion. J Neurosci 2001; 21:Rc165.
15. Levesque J, Eugene F, Joanette Y, et al. Neural circuitry underlying voluntary suppression of sadness. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 53:502–510.
16. Ochsner KN, Ray RD, Cooper JC, et al. For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion. Neuroimage 2004; 23:483–499.
17. Milad MR, Quirk GJ. Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction. Nature 2002; 420:70–74.
18. Quirk GJ, Mueller D. Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33:56–72.
19. Pezawas L, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Drabant EM, et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8:828–834.
20. Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron 2001; 30:829–841.
21. Phillips RG, LeDoux JE. Lesions of the fornix but not the entorhinal or perirhinal cortex interfere with contextual fear conditioning. J Neurosci 1995; 15:5308–5315.
22. Fanselow MS, Dong HW. Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures? Neuron 2010; 65:7–19.
23. Phillips RG, LeDoux JE. Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci 1992; 106:274–285.
24▪. VanElzakker MB, Dahlgren MK, Davis FC, et al. From Pavlov to PTSD: the extinction of conditioned fear in rodents, humans, and anxiety disorders. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2014; 113:3–18.

A comprehensive overview of fear conditioning and extinction in rodents, healthy humans, and patient populations.

25▪▪. Ahs F, Kragel PA, Zielinski DJ, et al. Medial prefrontal pathways for the contextual regulation of extinguished fear in humans. Neuroimage 2015; 122:262–271.

The study elucidates the neural mechanisms of context-dependent fear renewal in humans, and reveals the dissociable contextual influences of the hippocampus on prefrontal pathways.

26. Maddock RJ, Buonocore MH, Kile SJ, Garrett AS. Brain regions showing increased activation by threat-related words in panic disorder. Neuroreport 2003; 14:325–328.
27. Fischer H, Andersson JLR, Furmark T, Fredrikson M. Brain correlates of an unexpected panic attack: a human positron emission tomographic study. Neurosci Lett 1998; 251:137–140.
28. Goldin PR, Manber T, Hakimi S, et al. Neural bases of social anxiety disorder emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66:170–180.
29. Phan KL, Fitzgerald DA, Nathan PJ, Tancer ME. Association between amygdala hyperactivity to harsh faces and severity of social anxiety in generalized social phobia. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 59:424–429.
30. Dilger S, Straube T, Mentzel H-J, et al. Brain activation to phobia-related pictures in spider phobic humans: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett 2003; 348:29–32.
31. Schienle A, Schafer A, Hermann A, et al. Symptom provocation and reduction in patients suffering from spider phobia: an fMRI study on exposure therapy. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2007; 257:486–493.
32. Larson CL, Schaefer HS, Siegle GJ, et al. Fear is fast in phobic individuals: amygdala activation in response to fear-relevant stimuli. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 60:410–417.
33. Nitschke JB, Sarinopoulos I, Oathes DJ, et al. Anticipatory activation in the amygdala and anterior cingulate in generalized anxiety disorder and prediction of treatment response. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:302–310.
34. Monk CS, Telzer EH, Mogg K, et al. Amygdala and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation to masked angry faces in children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:568–576.
35. Stein MB, Goldin PR, Sareen J, et al. Increased amygdala activation to angry and contemptuous faces in generalized social phobia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59:1027–1034.
36. Armony JL, Corbo V, Clement MH, Brunet A. Amygdala response in patients with acute PTSD to masked and unmasked emotional facial expressions. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:1961–1963.
37. Etkin A, Wager TD. Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:1476–1488.
38. Phan KL, Britton JC, Taylor SF, et al. Corticolimbic blood flow during nontraumatic emotional processing in posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63:184–192.
39. Jovanovic T, Norrholm SD, Fennell JE, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder may be associated with impaired fear inhibition: relation to symptom severity. Psychiatry Res 2009; 167:151–160.
40. Greenberg T, Carlson JM, Cha J, et al. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex reactivity is altered in generalized anxiety disorder during fear generalization. Depress Anxiety 2013; 30:242–250.
41. Britton JC, Phan KL, Taylor SF, et al. Corticolimbic blood flow in posttraumatic stress disorder during script-driven imagery. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:832–840.
42. Milad MR, Pitman RK, Ellis CB, et al. Neurobiological basis of failure to recall extinction memory in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66:1075–1082.
43. Tromp DPM, Grupe DW, Oathes DJ, et al. Reduced structural connectivity of a major frontolimbic pathway in generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69:925–934.
44▪. Sladky R, Hoflich A, Kublbock M, et al. Disrupted effective connectivity between the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in social anxiety disorder during emotion discrimination revealed by dynamic causal modeling for FMRI. Cereb Cortex 2015; 25:895–903.

The first study to use dynamic causal modeling to reveal an important neurophysiologic dysfunction in the emotion regulation circuitry of SAD patients, suggesting an upregulation of amygdalar activation and corroborating previous reports of reduced connectivity between the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala in SAD patients.

45▪. Cha J, Greenberg T, Carlson JM, et al. Circuit-wide structural and functional measures predict ventromedial prefrontal cortex fear generalization: implications for generalized anxiety disorder. J Neurosci 2014; 34:4043–4053.

An important study integrating multiple neural metrics which suggests that multiple parallel aberrations in distributed brain areas together have a significant impact on vmPFC functioning, which has a critical role in fear generalization.

46▪. Lissek S, Kaczkurkin AN, Rabin S, et al. Generalized anxiety disorder is associated with overgeneralization of classically conditioned fear. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 75:909–915.

An article that demonstrates overgeneralization of conditioned fear among GAD patients, and provides clues into the symptomology of the disorder.

47. Lissek S, Rabin SJ, McDowell DJ, et al. Impaired discriminative fear-conditioning resulting from elevated fear responding to learned safety cues among individuals with panic disorder. Behav Res Ther 2009; 47:111–118.
48▪. Garfinkel SN, Abelson JL, King AP, et al. Impaired contextual modulation of memories in PTSD: an fMRI and psychophysiological study of extinction retention and fear renewal. J Neurosci 2014; 34:13435–13443.

The study reveals a general diminished capacity to use contextual information to modulate fear expression among PTSD patients, which suggests that the deficit in fear extinction recall in this disorder may be a result of more general contextual modulation deficits.

49. Sachs G, Anderer P, Doby D, et al. Impaired conditional discrimination learning in social phobia. Neuropsychobiology 2003; 47:66–72.
50. Levy-Gigi E, Szabo C, Richter-Levin G, Keri S. Reduced hippocampal volume is associated with overgeneralization of negative context in individuals with PTSD. Neuropsychology 2015; 29:151–161.
51. O’Doherty DC, Chitty KM, Saddiqui S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging measurement of structural volumes in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Res 2015; 232:1–33.
52. Rauch SL, Shin LM, Phelps EA. Neurocircuitry models of posttraumatic stress disorder and extinction: human neuroimaging research: past, present, and future. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 60:376–382.
53. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 2000; 21:55–89.
54. Allostasis PSJE. A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. New York, NY: John Wiley &Sons;; 1988.
55. Goldstein LE, Rasmusson AM, Bunney BS, Roth RH. Role of the amygdala in the coordination of behavioral, neuroendocrine, and prefrontal cortical monoamine responses to psychological stress in the rat. J Neurosci 1996; 16:4787–4798.
56. Murphy BL, Arnsten AF, Goldman-Rakic PS, Roth RH. Increased dopamine turnover in the prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance in rats and monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:1325–1329.
57. Deutch AY, Roth RH. The determinants of stress-induced activation of the prefrontal cortical dopamine system. Prog Brain Res 1990; 85:367–402.
58. Kodama T, Hikosaka K, Honda Y, et al. Higher dopamine release induced by less rather than more preferred reward during a working memory task in the primate prefrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res 2014; 266:104–107.
59. Nakane H, Shimizu N, Hori T. Stress-induced norepinephrine release in the rat prefrontal cortex measured by microdialysis. Am J Physiol 1994; 267:R1559–R1566.
60. Van Bockstaele EJ, Colago EE, Valentino RJ. Amygdaloid corticotropin-releasing factor targets locus coeruleus dendrites: substrate for the co-ordination of emotional and cognitive limbs of the stress response. J Neuroendocrinol 1998; 10:743–757.
61. Birnbaum S, Gobeske KT, Auerbach J, et al. A role for norepinephrine in stress-induced cognitive deficits: alpha-1-adrenoceptor mediation in the prefrontal cortex. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:1266–1274.
62. Zahrt J, Taylor JR, Mathew RG, Arnsten AF. Supranormal stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors in the rodent prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance. J Neurosci 1997; 17:8528–8535.
63. Arnsten AF, Mathew R, Ubriani R, et al. Alpha-1 noradrenergic receptor stimulation impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45:26–31.
64. Birnbaum SG, Yuan PX, Wang M, et al. Protein kinase C overactivity impairs prefrontal cortical regulation of working memory. Science (New York, NY) 2004; 306:882–884.
65. Grundemann D, Schechinger B, Rappold GA, Schomig E. Molecular identification of the corticosterone-sensitive extraneuronal catecholamine transporter. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1:349–351.
66. Mizoguchi K, Ishige A, Aburada M, Tabira T. Chronic stress attenuates glucocorticoid negative feedback: involvement of the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Neuroscience 2003; 119:887–897.
67. Sapolsky RM, Krey LC, McEwen BS. Glucocorticoid-sensitive hippocampal neurons are involved in terminating the adrenocortical stress response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1984; 81:6174–6177.
68. Veer IM, Oei NY, Spinhoven P, et al. Endogenous cortisol is associated with functional connectivity between the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012; 37:1039–1047.
69. Juster RP, Marin MF, Sindi S, et al. Allostatic load associations to acute, 3-year and 6-year prospective depressive symptoms in healthy older adults. Physiol Behav 2011; 104:360–364.
70. McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:2093–2101.
71. Seeman TE, McEwen BS, Rowe JW, Singer BH. Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:4770–4775.
72. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. JAMA 1996; 276:293–299.
73. Raune D, Kuipers E, Bebbington P. Stressful and intrusive life events preceding first episode psychosis. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2009; 18:221–228.
74. Hammen C, Gitlin M. Stress reactivity in bipolar patients and its relation to prior history of disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:856–857.
75. Breslau N. The epidemiology of trauma, PTSD, and other posttrauma disorders. Trauma Violence Abuse 2009; 10:198–210.
76. Johansson L, Guo X, Hallstrom T, et al. Common psychosocial stressors in middle-aged women related to longstanding distress and increased risk of Alzheimer's disease: a 38-year longitudinal population study. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e003142.
77. Johansson L, Guo X, Waern M, et al. Midlife psychological stress and risk of dementia: a 35-year longitudinal population study. Brain 2010; 133:2217–2224.
78. Wadsworth LP, Lorius N, Donovan NJ, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and global functional impairment along the Alzheimer's continuum. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012; 34:96–111.
79. Somme J, Fernandez-Martinez M, Molano A, Zarranz JJ. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: increased risk and faster progression to dementia. Curr Alzheimer Res 2013; 10:86–94.
80. Palmer K, Berger AK, Monastero R, et al. Predictors of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2007; 68:1596–1602.
81. Rosenberg PB, Mielke MM, Appleby BS, et al. The association of neuropsychiatric symptoms in MCI with incident dementia and Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013; 21:685–695.
82. Liu HC, Wang PN, Wang HC, et al. Conversion to dementia from questionable dementia in an ethnic Chinese population. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2007; 20:76–83.
83. Devier DJ, Pelton GH, Tabert MH, et al. The impact of anxiety on conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24:1335–1342.
84. Ramakers IH, Visser PJ, Aalten P, et al. Affective symptoms as predictors of Alzheimer's disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a 10-year follow-up study. Psychol Med 2010; 40:1193–1201.
85. Brodaty H, Heffernan M, Draper B, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in older people with and without cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2012; 31:411–420.
86. Gallagher D, Coen R, Kilroy D, et al. Anxiety and behavioural disturbance as markers of prodromal Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26:166–172.
87. Chan WC, Lam LC, Tam CW, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with increased risks of progression to dementia: a 2-year prospective study of 321 Chinese older persons with mild cognitive impairment. Age Ageing 2011; 40:30–35.
88. Robert PH, Berr C, Volteau M, et al. Apathy in patients with mild cognitive impairment and the risk of developing dementia of Alzheimer's disease: a one-year follow-up study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006; 108:733–736.
89. Ramakers IH, Verhey FR, Scheltens P, et al. Anxiety is related to Alzheimer cerebrospinal fluid markers in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Psychol Med 2013; 43:911–920.
90. Green KN, Billings LM, Roozendaal B, et al. Glucocorticoids increase amyloid-beta and tau pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 2006; 26:9047–9056.
91▪. Mah L, Binns MA, Steffens DC. Anxiety symptoms in amnestic mild cognitive impairment are associated with medial temporal atrophy and predict conversion to Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015; 23:466–476.

The study demonstrated that anxiety symptoms in aMCI increased rate of conversion to Alzheimer's disease, while controlling for depression and cognitive decline. We also demonstrated that anxiety was associated with increased rate of entorhinal cortex atrophy.

92. Woolley CS, Gould E, McEwen BS. Exposure to excess glucocorticoids alters dendritic morphology of adult hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Brain Res 1990; 531:225–231.
93. Lupien SJ, de Leon M, de Santi S, et al. Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1:69–73.
94. Conrad CD. Chronic stress-induced hippocampal vulnerability: the glucocorticoid vulnerability hypothesis. Rev Neurosci 2008; 19:395–411.
95. Gould E, Cameron HA, Daniels DC, et al. Adrenal hormones suppress cell division in the adult rat dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 1992; 12:3642–3650.
96. Sapolsky RM, Krey LM, McEwen BS. The neuroendocrinology of stress and aging: the glucocorticoid cascade hypothesis. Endocr Rev 1986; 7:284–301.
97. Mattson MP, Maudsley S, Martin B. BDNF and 5-HT: a dynamic duo in age-related neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci 2004; 27:589–594.
98. Petrik D, Lagace DC, Eisch AJ. The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders: are we mistaking the scaffolding for the building? Neuropharmacology 2012; 62:21–34.
99. Miller BR, Hen R. The current state of the neurogenic theory of depression and anxiety. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2015; 30:51–58.
100. David DJ, Samuels BA, Rainer Q, et al. Neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of fluoxetine in an animal model of anxiety/depression. Neuron 2009; 62:479–493.
101. Hill AS, Sahay A, Hen R. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to reduce anxiety and depression-like behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015; 40:2368–2378.
102. McAvoy K, Russo C, Kim S, et al. Fluoxetine induces input-specific hippocampal dendritic spine remodeling along the septotemporal axis in adulthood and middle age. Hippocampus 2015; [Epub ahead of print].
103. Murray F, Smith DW, Hutson PH. Chronic low dose cortisosterone exposure decreased hippocampal cell proliferation, volume and induced anxiety and depression like behaviours in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 2008; 583:115–127.
104. Kim JJ, Diamond DM. The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3:453–462.
105. Revest JM, Dupret D, Koehl M, et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in anxiety-related behaviors. Mol Psychiatry 2009; 14:959–967.
106. Sapolsky RM. Glucocorticoids and hippocampal atrophy in neuropsychiatric disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57:925–935.
107. Kroeze Y, Peeters D, Boulle F, et al. Long-term consequences of chronic fluoxetine exposure on the expression of myelination-related genes in the rat hippocampus. Transl Psychiatry 2015; 5:e642.
108▪. Seo DO, Carillo MA, Chih-Hsiung Lim S, et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis modulates fear learning through associative and nonassociative mechanisms. J Neurosci 2015; 35:11330–11345.

An excellent overview of neurogenesis and the important role of hippocampal-dependent learning and emotional regulation in relation to aversive experience.

109. Cook SC, Wellman CL. Chronic stress alters dendritic morphology in rat medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurobiol 2004; 60:236–248.
110. Liston C, Miller MM, Goldwater DS, et al. Stress-induced alterations in prefrontal cortical dendritic morphology predict selective impairments in perceptual attentional set-shifting. J Neurosci 2006; 26:7870–7874.
111. Radley JJ, Rocher AB, Janssen WG, et al. Reversibility of apical dendritic retraction in the rat medial prefrontal cortex following repeated stress. Exp Neurol 2005; 196:199–203.
112. Shansky RM, Hamo C, Hof PR, et al. Stress-induced dendritic remodeling in the prefrontal cortex is circuit specific. Cereb Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 2009; 19:2479–2484.
113. Hains AB, Vu MA, Maciejewski PK, et al. Inhibition of protein kinase C signaling protects prefrontal cortex dendritic spines and cognition from the effects of chronic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:17957–17962.
114. Vyas A, Mitra R, Shankaranarayana Rao BS, Chattarji S. Chronic stress induces contrasting patterns of dendritic remodeling in hippocampal and amygdaloid neurons. J Neurosci 2002; 22:6810–6818.
115. Ansell EB, Rando K, Tuit K, et al. Cumulative adversity and smaller gray matter volume in medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and insula regions. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 72:57–64.
116. Liston C, McEwen BS, Casey BJ. Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:912–917.
117. Kim P, Evans GW, Angstadt M, et al. Effects of childhood poverty and chronic stress on emotion regulatory brain function in adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:18442–18447.
118. Frodl TS, Koutsouleris N, Bottlender R, et al. Depression-related variation in brain morphology over 3 years: effects of stress? Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:1156–1165.
119. Bondi CO, Jett JD, Morilak DA. Beneficial effects of desipramine on cognitive function of chronically stressed rats are mediated by alpha1-adrenergic receptors in medial prefrontal cortex. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2010; 34:913–923.
120. Chen G, Rajkowska G, Du F, et al. Enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis by lithium. J Neurochem 2000; 75:1729–1734.
121. O’Leary OF, O’Connor RM, Cryan JF. Lithium-induced effects on adult hippocampal neurogenesis are topographically segregated along the dorso-ventral axis of stressed mice. Neuropharmacology 2012; 62:247–255.
122. Yucel K, McKinnon MC, Taylor VH, et al. Bilateral hippocampal volume increases after long-term lithium treatment in patients with bipolar disorder: a longitudinal MRI study. Psychopharmacology 2007; 195:357–367.
123. Forlenza OV, Diniz BS, Radanovic M, et al. Disease-modifying properties of long-term lithium treatment for amnestic mild cognitive impairment: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 198:351–356.
124. Erikson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:3017–3022.
125. Warner-Schmidt JL, Duman RS. Hippocampal neurogenesis: opposing effects of stress and antidepressant treatment. Hippocampus 2006; 16:239–249.
126. Ruhe HG, Booij J, Veltman DJ, et al. Successful pharmacologic treatment of major depressive disorder attenuates amygdala activation to negative facial expressions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Clin Psychiatry 2012; 73:451–459.
127▪. Arnsten AF, Raskind MA, Taylor FB, Connor DF. The effects of stress exposure on prefrontal cortex: translating basic research into successful treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder. Neurobiol Stress 2015; 1:89–99.

An excellent review of varying levels of stress and its effects on the PFC and amygdala, while highlighting the relevance of this research in PTSD.

128. Andreescu C, Sheu LK, Tudorascu D, et al. Emotion reactivity and regulation in late-life generalized anxiety disorder: functional connectivity at baseline and posttreatment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015; 23:200–214.
129. Fonzo GA, Ramsawh HJ, Flagan TM, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder is associated with attenuation of limbic activation to threat-related facial emotions. J Affect Disord 2014; 169:76–85.
130. Taylor CT, Aupperle RL, Flagan T, et al. Neural correlates of a computerized attention modification program in anxious subjects. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014; 9:1379–1387.
131▪. Lipka J, Hoffmann M, Miltner WH, Straube T. Effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on brain responses to subliminal and supraliminal threat and their functional significance in specific phobia. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 76:869–877.

The study highlights the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy treatment on brain activation, with successful treatment being associated with downregulation of fear circuitry structures.

132. Goldin PR, Ziv M, Jazaieri H, et al. Impact of cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder on the neural dynamics of cognitive reappraisal of negative self-beliefs: randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70:1048–1056.
133. Holzel BK, Hoge EA, Greve DN, et al. Neural mechanisms of symptom improvements in generalized anxiety disorder following mindfulness training. Neuroimage Clin 2013; 2:448–458.
134▪. Supekar K, Iuculano T, Chen L, Menon V. Remediation of childhood math anxiety and associated neural circuits through cognitive tutoring. J Neurosci 2015; 35:12574–12583.

The study demonstrates that simple cognitive tutoring for math anxiety can normalize activity of the neural circuits involved in emotion regulation.

Keywords:

anxiety; cognition; emotion regulation; hippocampal neurogenesis; stress

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.