Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Nasal irrigation with or without drugs: the evidence

Adappa, Nithin D.; Wei, Calvin C.; Palmer, James N.

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery: February 2012 - Volume 20 - Issue 1 - p 53–57
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834dfa80
NOSE AND PARANASAL SINUSES: Edited by Anshul Sama

Purpose of review: To review the recent literature of nasal irrigations with or without drugs, including delivery systems, nasal saline, antibiotics, antifungals, steroids, surfactants, and interleukin (IL)-5 modulators, for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Recent findings: As antibiotic resistance increases in CRS, culture-directed, rather than empiric, topical antibiotics are increasingly critical in optimal treatment. Topical irrigation with mupirocin significantly reduces Staphylococcus aureus biofilm mass in vitro. Surfactants and humanized anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody are novel therapies demonstrating promising results in CRS.

Summary: Physiologic saline irrigation is beneficial in the treatment of symptoms of CRS. Low-level evidence supports the effectiveness of topical antibiotics in the treatment of CRS. The use of topical antifungals is not supported by the majority of studies. Intranasal steroids are beneficial in the treatment of CRS with nasal polyposis. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a clear overall benefit for topical steroids in CRS without nasal polyposis.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence to James N. Palmer, MD, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Ravdin Building 5th Floor, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Tel: +1 215 662 7746; fax: +1 215 614 0071; e-mail: James.Palmer@uphs.upenn.edu

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.