Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2008 - Volume 20 - Issue 2 > Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in 2008
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f7321f
Prenatal diagnosis: Edited by Maurice L. Druzin

Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in 2008

Evans, Mark Ia,b,c; Andriole, Stephaniea,b

Collapse Box


Purpose of review: Over the past decades there have been wide discrepancies between quoted risks of diagnostic procedures (chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis) yet little properly controlled and randomized data to back often dogmatic assertions. Here, we review the historical and current literature to determine realistic estimates.

Recent findings: Several papers this past year have addressed in cohort studies and meta-analyses composite risks for both chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The studies have had varying degrees of reliability and likely reproducibility.

Summary: Despite one outlier paper, which had major methodological flaws, the consensus of the modern literature is that in experienced hands there is little to no differences between the procedure risks of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. The latter, however, is clearly harder to learn and has a steeper learning curve.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.