Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2006 - Volume 18 - Issue 6 > Induction of labour with previous caesarean delivery: where...
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology:
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280105a4e
Women's health

Induction of labour with previous caesarean delivery: where do we stand?

Kayani, Salma Ia; Alfirevic, Zarkob

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose of review: This paper reviews the literature to elucidate the international stance on induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.

Recent findings: There is no evidence to suggest that current induction methods are less effective in women with previous caesarean section. It would, therefore, seem logical to use the same regimens as for women with intact uteri, including prostaglandins, particularly in women with unfavourable cervices. The clinical decision making and counselling, however, will always focus on safety, not effectiveness. There is no question that induction of labour is associated with higher risk of uterine rupture, but quantifying this risk remains elusive.

Summary: For the present, we will continue our practice, based on the sources of the best evidence available. Improvements in obstetric care have not only reduced the risks associated with uterine rupture but also risks associated with caesarean section. Therefore, both elective caesarean section and induction of labour, with or without prostaglandins, are reasonable choices for women who need induction with previous caesarean section. The efforts to better quantify the benefits/risks of various policies and regimens should continue, but should be complemented with qualitative studies to obtain crucial insight into the demands and challenges confronting women and clinicians to identify factors influencing their decision-making or their preferences.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.