Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2013 - Volume 19 - Issue 6 > Intravenous fluids in sepsis: what to use and what to avoid
Current Opinion in Critical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000028
RENAL SYSTEM: Edited by Ravindra L. Mehta

Intravenous fluids in sepsis: what to use and what to avoid

Karakala, Nithina; Raghunathan, Karthikb; Shaw, Andrew D.b

Collapse Box


Purpose of review: Septic shock is one of the most common and life-threatening conditions afflicting critically ill patients. Intravenous volume resuscitation is considered an initial and very important step in management. The most suitable fluid for volume expansion during septic shock remains unclear. In this review, we focus on the benefits and adverse effects of the most commonly used intravenous fluids in critically ill septic patients.

Recent findings: The debate about the benefits of colloids over crystalloids has been ongoing for the last few decades. With recent literature showing apparent harm from the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HESs), and given the growing concerns of adverse renal and acid–base abnormalities associated with 0.9% saline compared with balanced crystalloid solutions, it may be time to change the nature of the ‘fluid debate’.

Summary: Crystalloids should still be considered as the first-choice drug for volume resuscitation in patients with septic shock. Colloids such as albumin can be considered in some clinical settings. HES should be avoided. Balanced crystalloids might have an important role to play in the management of septic shock.

© 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.