Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2013 - Volume 19 - Issue 4 > Blood component transfusion in critically ill patients
Current Opinion in Critical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283632e56
INTRAVENOUS FLUIDS: Edited by John Myburgh

Blood component transfusion in critically ill patients

McIntyre, Lauralyn; Tinmouth, Alan T.; Fergusson, Dean A.

Collapse Box


Purpose of review: This review summarizes the current evidence base for commonly transfused blood components with a particular focus on the nonacutely bleeding patient.

Recent findings: There remains little definitive evidence to guide transfusion practices in the critically ill. The most rigorous evidence to guide red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practice is derived from the Transfusion in Critical Care Trial (TRICC Trial) that was published in 1999. Specific subgroups of patients may be at particular risk of the adverse effects of anemia, and require further study. There are no randomized controlled trials addressing clinically important outcomes evaluating frozen plasma, platelet thresholds, or impaired platelet activity in the critically ill.

Summary: As all blood components have some level of risk, the general approach to transfusion should be one of minimization. For the nonacutely bleeding critically ill patient, a RBC transfusion trigger of 70 g/l is clinically acceptable. For patients at potentially higher risk of adverse effects related to anemia such as those with septic shock, severe and/or acute ischemic heart disease, or brain injury, a higher threshold (80–90 g/l) may be considered. There is insufficient evidence to recommend specific thresholds for transfusion of frozen plasma or platelets in the critically ill.

© 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.