Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2013 - Volume 13 - Issue 1 > Social networks and bronchial asthma
Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology:
doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32835af1c6
MECHANISMS OF ALLERGY AND ADULT ASTHMA: Edited by Stephen T. Holgate and J. Andrew Grant

Social networks and bronchial asthma

D’Amato, Gennaroa; Cecchi, Lorenzob; Liccardi, Gennaroa; D’Amato, Mariac; Stanghellini, Giovannid

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

aDivision of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Department of Respiratory Diseases, High Speciality Hospital A.Cardarelli Napoli, Naples

bAllergy and Clinical Immunology Section, Azienda Sanitaria di Prato, Prato

cFirst Division of Pneumology, High Speciality Hospital ‘V.Monaldi’ and University ‘Federico II Medical School, Naples

dDISPUTer, ‘G. d’Annunzio’ University, Chieti, Italy

Correspondence to Gennaro D’Amato MD, FAAAAI, Director, Division of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Department of Chest Diseases High Speciality A.Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy. Tel: +39 335 5915589; e-mail: gdamatomail@gmail.com

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose of review: To focus on both positive and negative aspects of the interaction between asthmatic patients and the social networks, and to highlight the need of a psychological approach in some individuals to integrate pharmacological treatment is the purpose of review.

Recent findings: There is evidence that in some asthmatic patients, the excessive use of social networks can induce depression and stress triggering bronchial obstruction, whereas in others their rational use can induce beneficial effects in terms of asthma management.

Summary: The increasing asthma prevalence in developed countries seen at the end of last century has raised concern for the considerable burden of this disease on society as well as individuals. Bronchial asthma is a disease in which psychological implications play a role in increasing or in reducing the severity of bronchial obstruction. Internet and, in particular, social media are increasingly a part of daily life of both young and adult people, thus allowing virtual relationships with peers sharing similar interests and goals. Although social network users often disclose more about themselves online than they do in person, there might be a risk for adolescents and for sensitive individuals, who can be negatively influenced by an incorrect use. However, although some studies show an increased risk of depression, other observations suggest beneficial effects of social networks by enhancing communication, social connection and self-esteem.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

An increasing part of the two billion people on the Internet are connected with a social network [http://www.internetworldstats.com (Accessed 10 August 2012)]. Facebook users were more than 800 million, still increasing by almost 30% since the beginning of 2011 (http://www.internetworldstats.com), and Twitter recently surpassed 500 million users [http://www.twitter.com (Accessed 10 August 2012)]. Sixty-five percent of online adults use social networking sites and the figure reaches 83% when users aged 18–29 years are considered [1].

The number of people connected to social networks on a daily basis and their social and psychological consequences pose new challenges for healthcare providers. On the one hand, social networks might provide an invaluable tool for the management of patients, particularly those affected by chronic diseases; on the other hand, they raised concerns about the possible effects on physical and/or psychological health. It is worth mentioning that use of social media is among the most common activities of today's children and adolescents. Thus, a large part of this generation's social and emotional development is occurring while on the Internet.

As use of social networks has been introduced only recently, few studies have been published on both the beneficial effects and potential risk for psychophysical health, and especially focused on adolescent and young adults, the population mostly being ‘exposed’ to this new type of virtual relationship. In some countries, various associations of healthcare professionals are starting to issue codes of conduct when dealing with new digital media [2–4], and discussion is still on going in medical journals [5–7].

As mentioned above, young adults are the biggest users of social media and even the population most affected by asthma. In fact, asthma is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases in childhood in many countries [8,9]. In 2004, the estimated cost of asthma symptoms among children in the European Union was 3000 million euros, not to mention absences from school and limitations in activities, indicating that asthma in children is a substantial disease burden for society [10].

Box 1
Box 1
Image Tools

The increase in asthma prevalence in developed countries seen at the end of last century has raised concern for the considerable burden of this disease on society as well as individuals.

In this context, use of social media in the management of asthmatic patients (especially in young adults) as well as its potential negative effects deserve more attention among doctors and health providers.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL EFFECTS OF SOCIAL NETWORKS

Social-networking sites provide new access to the self, new chances to define one's identity and to develop new kinds of relationships. Photos, personal details and comments provide multiple opportunities for selective self-presentation, shedding new light on previously understood psychological processes.

Adolescents report that they often disclose more about themselves on social networks than they do in person [11]. As an example, in the section ‘status update’ of their Facebook profiles, they describe current experience or emotion along with the date and time of disclosure.

Thus, social networks may have positive as well as negative and potentially pathological effects especially on mental health. Several studies suggest that use of social media in general might have a beneficial effect on children and adolescents by enhancing socialization and even technical skills [12]. Social networks offer multiple daily opportunities for connecting with friends and for sharing common interests. Recently, Facebook has been shown to be able to stimulate online socialization, thus supporting and enhancing ‘social self-esteem’, measured as perceptions of one's physical appearance, close relationships and romantic appeal, especially when users received positive feedback from Facebook friends [13]. Individuals with low self-esteem may improve their condition from the social opportunities provided by Facebook [14]. Especially, selective self-presentation, that is the possibility to decide which aspects of one's self (e.g. through pictures or personal information) to include in one's own profile, afforded by virtual world of social network sites, can have a positive influence on self-esteem [15].

Already over a decade ago, Internet use was thought to promote negative psychosocial well being, including depression and loneliness [16]. The increasing use of social networks might have amplified these effects in the last few years.

The kind of stressful events that can be found in social network users are not in general different in nature from those we find in face-to-face encounters. Being removed from friend lists (cyberostracism) or online aggression from others (cyberbullying) can be traumatic for adolescents. In an Irish study on teenagers using social networks, 10% male individuals and 12% female individuals experienced bullying online, whereas 27% reported inappropriate contact from others. In addition, 33% of them felt they accessed social networks too often, underlining the risk of overuse and addiction [17].

Also, as social network sites are designed to share information about the self with others, this information could increase the awareness of their own limitations, which would lower self-esteem. Movies and pictures posted in a personal profile are displayed only unemotionally, or sometimes they amplify the emotions linked to those images. So, the lack of a physical or visual contact hampers the perception of the reality, inducing false or unreal convictions and distorted emotions. Moreover, via social media, adolescents can come in contact with inappropriate content, don’t understand online privacy issues and/or can be influenced by third-party advertising groups. Internet addiction and concurrent sleep deprivation [18] other than physical inactivity, which is associated with an increased risk of obesity [19], have to be taken into consideration, too.

A new type of depression, called ‘Facebook depression,’ was recently identified in preteens and teens who spend a great part of their time on social media sites and experience intense relationships on the web [20,21]. So, they are at risk for social isolation and sometimes seek Internet sites for ‘help’ paradoxically, eventually finding promotion for substance abuse, unsafe sexual practices or aggressive or self-destructive behaviours [22▪]. A virtual life cannot replace the experience of being accepted by peers or the contact with them.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SOCIAL NETWORKS AS POTENTIAL SOURCE OF STRESS TRIGGERING ASTHMA

In 2010 we described the first case of asthma exacerbations possibly triggered by use of Facebook. In that case, a young boy experienced asthmatic symptoms when he was logged to the personal profile of his former girlfriend [23]. Although anecdotal, this case report raises new questions about social networks as a new source of psychological stress, representing a triggering factor for exacerbations in depressed asthmatic individuals. Therefore, social networks might be considered in the assessment of asthma exacerbations as a potential source of psychological stress.

Since the end of the 19th century, asthma is known to be a disease noteworthy for its vulnerability to stress and emotion-induced symptom intensification. In addition to the pathological cellular and molecular immune processes, evidence also suggests that psychological processes contribute to the regulation of airway inflammation and clinical expression of disease severity in asthma. Some immunoregolatory dysfunctions are even similar in allergic diseases and stressed population [24]. There is also good evidence that genes involved in the stress and inflammatory response may affect asthma expression [25].

An interaction between behavioural, neural, endocrine and immune processes, and of the correlation between psychological factors, the course of asthma and the outcomes of asthma treatment, has been recently proposed. Evidence is now available that psychological factors play an active role in the genesis of asthma [26▪].

It is generally acknowledged that psychological stress and mood and anxiety disorders are more common in asthmatic patients and appear to increase expression of asthma symptoms. [26▪,27]. However, the precise nature of the type of stress and of the neural pathways implicated in modulating asthma symptoms is unknown. The correlation between psychological disorders and asthma can be explained by the various hypotheses, which are not mutually exclusive: asthma itself increases the risk of developing anxiety and depression; mood and anxiety disorders lead to a higher risk of developing asthma; and asthma, anxiety, and depression are linked by a common underlying pathway.

The mechanisms underlying the interplay between psychological factors and asthma are still to be clarified. A credited model focuses on the close correlation between emotional stress, the immune system and the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis. Recently, neurophenotypes for asthma were identified by neural reactivity of brain circuits known to be involved in processing emotional information, especially in the anterior insula [28]. Individuals with asthma who have a late phase response showed increased anterior insular reactivity to asthma-relevant psychological stimuli, that is asthma-related words, exhibit greater inflammatory signals in the lung and increased severity of disease. These findings might reflect a subset of asthmatic patients, most vulnerable to the development of psychopathology, thus possibly offering a new target for potential therapeutic intervention.

A further question concerns the type of psychological stressors involved in the pathogenesis and/or the kindling of asthma. Because ‘stress’ is a very broad concept that includes a wide variety of events (e.g. loss, abandonment, personal assault, etc.), ways of being involved (personal experience, witnessing, etc.) and subjective emotional reactions (e.g. helplessness, fear, horror, etc.), speaking of stress in general is nonspecific and may have little clinical utility. Recent findings illustrate that psychosocial stress may influence asthma morbidity through posttraumatic stress disorder, prenatal and postnatal maternal/caregiver stress, family and community violence and deprivation [29]. Stress events in the life are associated with a major risk of developing asthma: divorce or separation, a major increase in marital problems, severe illness in a family member and severe conflicts with a supervisor. The hypothesis possibly explaining this observation is that stressful life events may alter the psychological, immunological and endocrine systems via mechanisms, which are still largely unknown [30].

In this view, a ‘virtual’ emotional, not unlike a ‘real-world’, stress might trigger an asthma exacerbation, especially in an individual with poorly controlled asthma because of a concurrent depression state, as in the case we previously described [23]. Thus, in clinical practice, asthmatic patients should be accurately evaluated from a psychological point of view, also taking into consideration virtual stresses, especially in young individuals. In-depth anamnesis of their habits, including social network frequentation, should be performed in analogy to what routinely happens for all sorts of behaviours and lifestyles, which may trigger asthma.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ASTHMA

Social networks are already showing possible beneficial effects, both for driving healthcare system reforms [31] and for improving patients’ networking (http://www.patientslikeme.com/). Some studies showed the effectiveness of social networks for disseminating public health messages, like food safety [32], sexual health education [33] and public health programmes in general [34]. The use of social media resources has been recently proposed to support more effective self-management among adolescents at high risk for systemic anaphylaxis [35].

Care for asthma patients has shifted from physician-managed care to guided self-management in the last years. However, written self-management plans and symptoms diaries are hampered by false and retrospective entries and by patients’ and doctors’ reluctance. For these reasons, several studies have recently shown that a web-based self-management of asthma is well tolerated, feasible, as effective as ‘classic’ management and costs are similar [36▪,37]. In addition, the combination of a web-based programme and a telephone nurse management showed a significant increase in asthma control (but not in adherence to treatment) in a paediatric population in a randomized controlled trial [38].

Moreover, text messaging and social sites were the preferred way to get information in a survey among 145 adult asthmatic patients [39]. Interestingly, female participants were more prone than male participants in the use of electronic media for asthma care.

Social networks might provide a beneficial effect on social relations of youth with asthma. As they can feel different and isolated from their peers and classmates, use of social networks and other media (e-mail, messaging) was shown to be effective in reducing isolation and loneliness and in improving self-confidence [40].

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

The dramatic increase in social network use, especially among adolescents and young adults, is driving healthcare researchers and professionals into a deeper knowledge on the effects of this new media on general population and on people affected by chronic diseases. At the moment, taken as a whole, negative effects of social networks, like those described for asthma, seem to be counterbalanced by the increasing evidence of a positive effect on self-esteem.

However, physicians, healthcare providers, scientific societies and medical associations should put this topic in their agenda and propose guidelines and rules on how to responsibly include new clinical strategies and technologies in the patients’ assessment, management and in the dissemination of health-related information.

Further studies are necessary to identify the occurrence of a ‘depressive-prone’ asthma phenotype to suggest an adequate psychological treatment as integration of allergen avoidance, drugs and immunotherapy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

None.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and that the study has been carried out without any financial support.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

▪ of special interest

▪▪ of outstanding interest

Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current World Literature section in this issue (p. 123).

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Madden M, Zickuhr K. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Networking-Sites.aspx. [Accessed 15 August 2012]

2. American Medical Association. AMA Policy: professionalism in the use of social media. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml. [Accessed 13 August 2012]

3. Social media and the medical profession: a guide to online professionalism for medical practitioners and medical students. A joint initiative of the Australian Medical Association Council of Doctors-in-Training, the New Zealand Medical Association Doctors-in-Training Council, the New Zealand Medical Students’ Association and the Australian Medical Students’ Association, 2010 British Medical Association. Using social media: practical and ethical guidance for doctors and medical students, British Medical Association, 1st ed; 2011. http://www.medschools.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/social_media_guidance_may2011.pdf. [Accessed 8 August 2012]

4. Doctors’ use of social media: a draft for consultation. http://www.gmc-uk.org/Draft_explanatory_guidance___Doctors_use_of_social_media.pdf_48499903.pdf. [Accessed 8 August 2012]

5. Social media: how doctors can contribute. Lancet 2012; 379:1562.

6. Devi S. Facebook friend request from a patient? Lancet 2011; 377:1141–1142.

7. Mansfield SJ, Morrison SG, Stephens HO, et al. Social media and the medical profession. Med J Aust 2011; 194:642–664.

8. Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, et al. ISAAC Phase Three Study Group Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet 2006; 368:733–743.

9. ISAAC Steering Committee. Worldwide variation in prevalence symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and atopic eczema: ISAAC. Lancet 1998; 351:1225–1232.

10. van den Akker-van Marle JM, Bruil J, Detmar SB. Evaluation of cost of disease: assessing the burden to society of asthma in children in the European Union. Allergy 2005; 60:140–149.

11. Moreno MA, Jelenchick LA, Egan KG, et al. Feeling bad on Facebook: depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depress Anxiety 2011; 28:447–455.

12. Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res 1996; 23:3–43.

13. Ito M, Horst H, Bittani M. Living and learning with new media: summary of findings from the digital youth project. John D, Catherine T, editors. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning; Chicago, IL, USA; 2008. http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf. [Accessed 16 July 2010]

14. Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 9:484–590.

15. Gonzales AL, Hancock JT. Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011; 14:79–83.

16. Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, et al. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well being? Am Psychol 1998; 53:1017–1031.

17. Machold C, Judge G, Mavrinac A, et al. Social networking patterns/hazards among teenagers. Ir Med J 2012; 105:151–152.

18. Christakis DA, Moreno MA. Trapped in the net: will internet addiction become a 21stcentury epidemic? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163:959–960.

19. Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SY. Childhood obesity. Lancet 2010; 375:1737–1748.

20. Sturm S. Social networking psych studies: research shows teen Facebook users prone to depression. TrendHunter. http://www.trendhunter.com/trends/depressionfrom-facebook. [Accessed 7 September 2010]

21. Selfhout MHW, Branje SJT, Delsing M, et al. Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: the role of perceived friendship quality. J Adolesc 2009; 32:819–833.

22▪. O’Keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K. Council on communications and media the impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 2011; 127:800–804.

A useful introduction to the risks induced by social network misuse in children and adolescents.

23. D’Amato G, Liccardi G, Cecchi L, et al. Facebook: a new trigger for asthma? Lancet 2010; 376:1740.

24. Dave ND, Xiang L, Rehm KE, Marshall GD Jr. Stress and allergic diseases. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2011; 31:55–68.

25. Priftis KN, Papadimitriou A, Nicolaidou P, Chrousos GP. Dysregulation of the stress response in asthmatic children. Allergy 2009; 64:18–31.

26▪. Di Marco F, Santus P, Centanni S. Anxiety and depression in asthma. Curr Opin Pulmon Med 2011; 17:39–44.

The key epidemiological and pathogenetic findings on the association between asthma and main psychological disorders. The starting point for the understanding of the effects of social networks.

27. Walters P, Schofield P, Howard L, et al. The relationship between asthma and depression in primary care patients: a historical cohort and nested case control study. PLoS One 2011; 6:e20750.

28. Rosenkranz MA, Busse WW, Sheridan JF, et al. Are there neurophenotypes for asthma? Functional brain imaging of the interaction between emotion and inflammation in asthma. PLoS ONE August 2012; 7:e40921.

29. Yonas MA, Lange NE, Celedón JC. Psychosocial stress and asthma morbidity. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 12:202–210.

30. Lietzén R, Virtanen P, Kivimäki M, et al. Stressful life events and the onset of asthma. Eur Respir J 2011; 37:1360–1365.

31. Shabbir SA, Che-Wei L, Scholl J, et al. Facebook use leads to health-care reform in Taiwan. Lancet 2011; 377:2083–2084.

32. Mayer AB, Harrison JA. Safe eats: an evaluation of the use of social media for food safety education. J Food Prot 2012; 75:1453–1463.

33. Selkie EM, Benson M, Moreno M. Adolescents’ views regarding uses of social networking websites and text messaging for adolescent sexual health education. Am J Health Educ 2011; 42:205–212.

34. Vyas AN, Landry M, Schnider M, et al. Public health interventions: reaching Latino adolescents via short message service and social media. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14:e99.

35. Gallagher M, Worth A, Cunningham-Burley S, Sheikh A. Strategies for living with the risk of anaphylaxis in adolescence: qualitative study of young people and their parents. Prim Care Respir J 2012. pii: pcrj-2012-04-0059-R1. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00072. [Epub ahead of print]

36▪. van der Meer V, van den Hout WB, Bakker MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of internet-based self-management compared with usual care in asthma. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e27108.

The first randomized controlled trial on the cost-effectiveness of internet-based self-management in asthma.

37. Araújo L, Jacinto T, Moreira A, et al. Clinical efficacy of web-based versus standard asthma self-management. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2012; 22:28–34.

38. Gustafson D, Wise M, Bhattacharya A, et al. The effects of combining web-based Ehealth with telephone nurse case management for pediatric asthma control: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14:e101.

39. Baptist AP, Thompson M, Grossman KS, et al. Social media, text messaging, and E-Mail-preferences of asthma patients between 12 and 40 years old. J Asthma 2011; 48:824–830.

40. Letourneau N, Stewart M, Masuda JR, et al. Impact of online support for youth with asthma and allergies: pilot study. J Pediatr Nurs 2012; 27:65–73.

Keywords:

bronchial hyperreactivity; Facebook-induced asthma; psychological triggers of asthma; social networks and psychophysical health; stress and asthma

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.