Skip Navigation LinksHome > December 2014 - Volume 30 - Issue 12 > Low Back Pain Patient Subgroups in Primary Care: Pain Charac...
Clinical Journal of Pain:
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000080
Original Articles

Low Back Pain Patient Subgroups in Primary Care: Pain Characteristics, Psychosocial Determinants, and Health Care Utilization

Hirsch, Oliver PhD*; Strauch, Konstantin PhD†,‡; Held, Heiko MD*; Redaelli, Marcus MD§,∥; Chenot, Jean-François MD, MPH, PhD¶,#; Leonhardt, Corinna PhD*,**; Keller, Stefan PhD††; Baum, Erika MD*; Pfingsten, Michael PhD‡‡; Hildebrandt, Jan MD, PhD‡‡; Basler, Heinz-Dieter PhD**; Kochen, Michael M. MD, MPH, PhD, FRCGP‡‡; Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert MD, MHSc*; Becker, Annette MD, MPH*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives:

In industrialized countries, low back pain (LBP) is one of the leading causes for prolonged sick leave, early retirement, and high health care costs. Providing the same treatments to all patients is neither effective nor feasible, and may impede patients’ recovery. Recent studies have outlined the need for subgroup-specific treatment allocation.

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional study that used baseline data from consecutively recruited patients participating in a guideline implementation trial regarding LBP in primary care. Classification variables were employment status, age, pain intensity, functional capacity (HFAQ), depression (CES-D), belief that activity causes pain (FABQ subscale), 2 scales of the SF-36 (general health, vitality), and days in pain per year. We performed k-means cluster analyses and split-half cross-validation. Subsequently, we investigated whether the resulting groups incurred different direct and indirect costs during a 6-month period before the index consultation.

Results:

A 4-cluster solution showed good statistical quality criteria, even after split-half cross-validation. “Elderly patients adapted to pain” (cluster 1) and “younger patients with acute pain” (cluster 4) accounted for 55% of all patients. Cluster validation showed the lowest direct and indirect costs in these groups. About 72% of total costs per patient referred to clusters 2 and 3 (“patients with chronic severe pain with comorbid depression” and “younger patients with subacute pain and emotional distress”).

Discussion:

Our study adds substantially to the knowledge of LBP-related case-mix in primary care. Information on differential health care needs may be inferred from our study, enabling decision makers to allocate resources more appropriately and to reduce costs.

Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.