Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2014 - Volume 30 - Issue 9 > Single-day Pain Assessments as Clinical Outcomes: Not So Fas...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Clinical Journal of Pain:
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000030
Original Article

Single-day Pain Assessments as Clinical Outcomes: Not So Fast

Stone, Arthur A. PhD*,†; Schneider, Stefan PhD*; Broderick, Joan E. PhD*; Schwartz, Joseph E. PhD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Introduction:

Pain diaries are important tools for clinical trials and optimal assay sensitivity of outcomes derived from these diaries is a worthwhile goal. Jensen and colleagues recently reported results suggesting that single-day diary-based outcomes could possibly be as psychometrically sound as outcomes based on taking the average of many diaries.

Materials and Methods:

In this paper, we attempted to replicate those results with several diary data sets.

Results and Discussion:

We come to a different conclusion than that advanced by Jensen and colleagues and conclude that their results were unusual in that very high test-retest reliability among days was found. With our 4 diary data sets we find that aggregating multiple diaries yields more reliable outcomes and improved sensitivity. We suggest that using single-day diaries will often lead to underpowered studies and that pretesting is advised before adopting single-day diaries. We also suggest that other researchers replicate these findings within their diary-based clinical trials.

Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.