Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2014 - Volume 30 - Issue 9 > Single-day Pain Assessments as Clinical Outcomes: Not So Fas...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Clinical Journal of Pain:
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000030
Original Article

Single-day Pain Assessments as Clinical Outcomes: Not So Fast

Stone, Arthur A. PhD*,†; Schneider, Stefan PhD*; Broderick, Joan E. PhD*; Schwartz, Joseph E. PhD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Introduction: Pain diaries are important tools for clinical trials and optimal assay sensitivity of outcomes derived from these diaries is a worthwhile goal. Jensen and colleagues recently reported results suggesting that single-day diary-based outcomes could possibly be as psychometrically sound as outcomes based on taking the average of many diaries.

Materials and Methods: In this paper, we attempted to replicate those results with several diary data sets.

Results and Discussion: We come to a different conclusion than that advanced by Jensen and colleagues and conclude that their results were unusual in that very high test-retest reliability among days was found. With our 4 diary data sets we find that aggregating multiple diaries yields more reliable outcomes and improved sensitivity. We suggest that using single-day diaries will often lead to underpowered studies and that pretesting is advised before adopting single-day diaries. We also suggest that other researchers replicate these findings within their diary-based clinical trials.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.