Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2013 - Volume 29 - Issue 11 > Predicting Prognostic Factors in a Randomized Controlled Tri...
Clinical Journal of Pain:
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827eb511
Original Articles

Predicting Prognostic Factors in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Acupuncture Versus Topiramate Treatment in Patients With Chronic Migraine

Yang, Chun-Pai MD*,†,‡; Chang, Ming-Hong MD§,∥; Li, Tsai-Chung MD, PhD¶,#; Hsieh, Ching-Liang MD, PhD**; Hwang, Kai-Lin MSc††; Chang, Hen-Hong MD, PhD‡‡

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background:

This study aimed to identify predictive factors of outcome in patients with chronic migraine (CM) treated with acupuncture or topiramate in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods:

Sixty-six consecutive CM patients were treated with either acupuncture (n=33) or topiramate (n=33) in a 12-week period. Data on potential predictive factors were collected at baseline, and secondary data analysis was performed to identify factors associated with treatment response. Treatment prognosis was defined as the change in mean number of moderate/severe headache days per 4 weeks from the 4-week baseline periods.

Results:

The median change in mean number of moderate/severe headache days per 4 weeks for patients with higher baseline headache days (>20 d) was significantly greater than that for lower baseline headache days (≤20 d) (median±interquartile range: −12±2 vs. −10±1 d, P=0.01) in acupuncture group. There was a greater change in mean number of moderate/severe headache days per 4 weeks for high moderate/severe headache days (>20 d) than in low days (≤20 d) (−12±1 vs. −10±2 d, P=0.015) in acupuncture group. patients with throbbing symptoms had better prognosis with acupuncture than those without throbbing (−12±2 vs. −9.5±2.5 d, P=0.004). Higher score (>5 points) in the general expectations for improvement predicted better response in both treatment groups (>5 vs. ≤5 points: −12±2 vs. −9±2 d for acupuncture group; −10±3 vs. −7±4 d for topiramate group; P<0.001).

Conclusions:

Some variables can predict outcome in acupuncture or topiramate treatment of CM patients. Identifying predictors of prognosis of both treatments for CM may help improve outcomes in future work.

Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.